maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity

Fix null reference creation in SelectionDAG constructor. 

Store TargetSelectionDAGInfo as a pointer instead of a reference:
getSelectionDAGInfo() may not be implemented for certain backends
(e.g. it's not currently implemented for R600).

This bug is reported by UBSan.

llvm-svn: 216129
This commit is contained in:
Alexey Samsonov 2014-08-20 21:40:15 +00:00
parent b8478abd2e
commit e229ec5bfc
2 changed files with 9 additions and 12 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/SelectionDAG.h
View File

@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ void checkForCycles(const SelectionDAG *DAG, bool force = false);
///
class SelectionDAG {
const TargetMachine &TM;
const TargetSelectionDAGInfo &TSI;
const TargetSelectionDAGInfo *TSI;
const TargetLowering *TLI;
MachineFunction *MF;
LLVMContext *Context;
@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ public:
const TargetMachine &getTarget() const { return TM; }
const TargetSubtargetInfo &getSubtarget() const { return MF->getSubtarget(); }
const TargetLowering &getTargetLoweringInfo() const { return *TLI; }
const TargetSelectionDAGInfo &getSelectionDAGInfo() const { return TSI; }
const TargetSelectionDAGInfo &getSelectionDAGInfo() const { return *TSI; }
LLVMContext *getContext() const {return Context; }
/// viewGraph - Pop up a GraphViz/gv window with the DAG rendered using 'dot'.

17
llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp
View File

@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ unsigned SelectionDAG::getEVTAlignment(EVT VT) const {
// EntryNode could meaningfully have debug info if we can find it...
SelectionDAG::SelectionDAG(const TargetMachine &tm, CodeGenOpt::Level OL)
: TM(tm), TSI(*tm.getSubtargetImpl()->getSelectionDAGInfo()), TLI(nullptr),
: TM(tm), TSI(tm.getSubtargetImpl()->getSelectionDAGInfo()), TLI(nullptr),
OptLevel(OL),
EntryNode(ISD::EntryToken, 0, DebugLoc(), getVTList(MVT::Other)),
Root(getEntryNode()), NewNodesMustHaveLegalTypes(false),
@ -4228,9 +4228,8 @@ SDValue SelectionDAG::getMemcpy(SDValue Chain, SDLoc dl, SDValue Dst,
// Then check to see if we should lower the memcpy with target-specific
// code. If the target chooses to do this, this is the next best.
SDValue Result =
TSI.EmitTargetCodeForMemcpy(*this, dl, Chain, Dst, Src, Size, Align,
isVol, AlwaysInline,
DstPtrInfo, SrcPtrInfo);
TSI->EmitTargetCodeForMemcpy(*this, dl, Chain, Dst, Src, Size, Align,
isVol, AlwaysInline, DstPtrInfo, SrcPtrInfo);
if (Result.getNode())
return Result;
@ -4296,9 +4295,8 @@ SDValue SelectionDAG::getMemmove(SDValue Chain, SDLoc dl, SDValue Dst,
// Then check to see if we should lower the memmove with target-specific
// code. If the target chooses to do this, this is the next best.
SDValue Result =
TSI.EmitTargetCodeForMemmove(*this, dl, Chain, Dst, Src, Size, Align, isVol,
DstPtrInfo, SrcPtrInfo);
SDValue Result = TSI->EmitTargetCodeForMemmove(
*this, dl, Chain, Dst, Src, Size, Align, isVol, DstPtrInfo, SrcPtrInfo);
if (Result.getNode())
return Result;
@ -4351,9 +4349,8 @@ SDValue SelectionDAG::getMemset(SDValue Chain, SDLoc dl, SDValue Dst,
// Then check to see if we should lower the memset with target-specific
// code. If the target chooses to do this, this is the next best.
SDValue Result =
TSI.EmitTargetCodeForMemset(*this, dl, Chain, Dst, Src, Size, Align, isVol,
DstPtrInfo);
SDValue Result = TSI->EmitTargetCodeForMemset(*this, dl, Chain, Dst, Src,
Size, Align, isVol, DstPtrInfo);
if (Result.getNode())
return Result;