Fix for PR5185. C99 [*] VLA notation should be disallowed in function definitions.

llvm-svn: 94972
This commit is contained in:
Sam Weinig 2010-02-01 05:02:49 +00:00
parent 760af170ff
commit deb55d5123
3 changed files with 22 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ def warn_unused_variable : Warning<"unused variable %0">,
InGroup<UnusedVariable>, DefaultIgnore;
def warn_decl_in_param_list : Warning<
"declaration of %0 will not be visible outside of this function">;
def err_array_star_in_function_definition : Error<
"variable length array must be bound in function definition">;
def warn_implicit_function_decl : Warning<
"implicit declaration of function %0">,

View File

@ -2616,6 +2616,20 @@ bool Sema::CheckParmsForFunctionDef(FunctionDecl *FD) {
!Param->isImplicit() &&
!getLangOptions().CPlusPlus)
Diag(Param->getLocation(), diag::err_parameter_name_omitted);
// C99 6.7.5.3p12:
// If the function declarator is not part of a definition of that
// function, parameters may have incomplete type and may use the [*]
// notation in their sequences of declarator specifiers to specify
// variable length array types.
QualType PType = Param->getOriginalType();
if (const ArrayType *AT = Context.getAsArrayType(PType)) {
if (AT->getSizeModifier() == ArrayType::Star) {
// FIXME: This diagnosic should point the the '[*]' if source-location
// information is added for it.
Diag(Param->getLocation(), diag::err_array_star_in_function_definition);
}
}
}
return HasInvalidParm;

View File

@ -54,3 +54,9 @@ int (*pr2044c(void))[pr2044b]; // expected-error {{variably modified type}}
const int f5_ci = 1;
void f5() { char a[][f5_ci] = {""}; } // expected-error {{variable-sized object may not be initialized}}
// PR5185
void pr5185(int a[*]);
void pr5185(int a[*]) // expected-error {{variable length array must be bound in function definition}}
{
}