Rename the existing tBX/tBXr9 instructions to tBX_CALL/tBXr9_CALL to better

reflect their actual meaning and match the ARM instructions.

llvm-svn: 132039
This commit is contained in:
Cameron Zwarich 2011-05-25 04:45:14 +00:00
parent eb3c36e69c
commit deaf994ff0
2 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -1875,7 +1875,7 @@ void ARMAsmPrinter::EmitInstruction(const MachineInstr *MI) {
case ARM::TAILJMPr:
case ARM::tTAILJMPr: {
unsigned newOpc = (Opc == ARM::TAILJMPr || Opc == ARM::TAILJMPrND)
? ARM::BX : ARM::tBX;
? ARM::BX : ARM::tBX_CALL;
MCInst TmpInst;
TmpInst.setOpcode(newOpc);
TmpInst.addOperand(MCOperand::CreateReg(MI->getOperand(0).getReg()));

View File

@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ let isCall = 1,
// ARMv4T
// FIXME: Should be a pseudo.
let isCodeGenOnly = 1 in
def tBX : TIx2<{?,?,?,?,?}, {?,?}, ?,
def tBX_CALL : TIx2<{?,?,?,?,?}, {?,?}, ?,
(outs), (ins tGPR:$func, variable_ops), IIC_Br,
"mov\tlr, pc\n\tbx\t$func",
[(ARMcall_nolink tGPR:$func)]>,
@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ let isCall = 1,
// ARMv4T
let isCodeGenOnly = 1 in
// FIXME: Should be a pseudo.
def tBXr9 : TIx2<{?,?,?,?,?}, {?,?}, ?,
def tBXr9_CALL : TIx2<{?,?,?,?,?}, {?,?}, ?,
(outs), (ins tGPR:$func, variable_ops), IIC_Br,
"mov\tlr, pc\n\tbx\t$func",
[(ARMcall_nolink tGPR:$func)]>,