From d879ce0715d535ee8ba1d4e04f28033a72216017 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan Gohman Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:19:17 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix typos Duncan noticed. llvm-svn: 96594 --- llvm/docs/AdvancedGetElementPtr.html | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/llvm/docs/AdvancedGetElementPtr.html b/llvm/docs/AdvancedGetElementPtr.html index fcd7cf4d0078..1e48bb33dbf5 100644 --- a/llvm/docs/AdvancedGetElementPtr.html +++ b/llvm/docs/AdvancedGetElementPtr.html @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@

And, GEP is more concise in common cases.

-

However, for of the underlying integer computation implied, there +

However, for the underlying integer computation implied, there is no difference.

@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ assume that the static array type bounds are respected.

The second sense of being out of bounds is computing an address that's - beyond of the actual underlying allocated object.

+ beyond the actual underlying allocated object.

With the inbounds keyword, the result value of the GEP is undefined if the address is outside the actual underlying allocated