forked from OSchip/llvm-project
Split dominance calculation and post dominance calculation stuff
Dominance calculation goes to VMCore library to be used by Verifier. llvm-svn: 3210
This commit is contained in:
parent
45dca23e2f
commit
d43023a85d
|
@ -1,93 +1,24 @@
|
|||
//===- DominatorSet.cpp - Dominator Set Calculation --------------*- C++ -*--=//
|
||||
//===- PostDominators.cpp - Post-Dominator Calculation --------------------===//
|
||||
//
|
||||
// This file provides a simple class to calculate the dominator set of a
|
||||
// function.
|
||||
// This file implements the post-dominator construction algorithms.
|
||||
//
|
||||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||||
|
||||
#include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/UnifyFunctionExitNodes.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Support/CFG.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Assembly/Writer.h"
|
||||
#include "Support/DepthFirstIterator.h"
|
||||
#include "Support/STLExtras.h"
|
||||
#include "Support/SetOperations.h"
|
||||
#include <algorithm>
|
||||
using std::set;
|
||||
|
||||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||||
// DominatorSet Implementation
|
||||
// PostDominatorSet Implementation
|
||||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||||
|
||||
static RegisterAnalysis<DominatorSet>
|
||||
A("domset", "Dominator Set Construction", true);
|
||||
static RegisterAnalysis<PostDominatorSet>
|
||||
B("postdomset", "Post-Dominator Set Construction", true);
|
||||
|
||||
AnalysisID DominatorSet::ID = A;
|
||||
AnalysisID PostDominatorSet::ID = B;
|
||||
|
||||
// dominates - Return true if A dominates B. This performs the special checks
|
||||
// neccesary if A and B are in the same basic block.
|
||||
//
|
||||
bool DominatorSetBase::dominates(Instruction *A, Instruction *B) const {
|
||||
BasicBlock *BBA = A->getParent(), *BBB = B->getParent();
|
||||
if (BBA != BBB) return dominates(BBA, BBB);
|
||||
|
||||
// Loop through the basic block until we find A or B.
|
||||
BasicBlock::iterator I = BBA->begin();
|
||||
for (; &*I != A && &*I != B; ++I) /*empty*/;
|
||||
|
||||
// A dominates B if it is found first in the basic block...
|
||||
return &*I == A;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// runOnFunction - This method calculates the forward dominator sets for the
|
||||
// specified function.
|
||||
//
|
||||
bool DominatorSet::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
|
||||
Doms.clear(); // Reset from the last time we were run...
|
||||
Root = &F.getEntryNode();
|
||||
assert(pred_begin(Root) == pred_end(Root) &&
|
||||
"Root node has predecessors in function!");
|
||||
|
||||
bool Changed;
|
||||
do {
|
||||
Changed = false;
|
||||
|
||||
DomSetType WorkingSet;
|
||||
df_iterator<Function*> It = df_begin(&F), End = df_end(&F);
|
||||
for ( ; It != End; ++It) {
|
||||
BasicBlock *BB = *It;
|
||||
pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(BB), PEnd = pred_end(BB);
|
||||
if (PI != PEnd) { // Is there SOME predecessor?
|
||||
// Loop until we get to a predecessor that has had it's dom set filled
|
||||
// in at least once. We are guaranteed to have this because we are
|
||||
// traversing the graph in DFO and have handled start nodes specially.
|
||||
//
|
||||
while (Doms[*PI].size() == 0) ++PI;
|
||||
WorkingSet = Doms[*PI];
|
||||
|
||||
for (++PI; PI != PEnd; ++PI) { // Intersect all of the predecessor sets
|
||||
DomSetType &PredSet = Doms[*PI];
|
||||
if (PredSet.size())
|
||||
set_intersect(WorkingSet, PredSet);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
WorkingSet.insert(BB); // A block always dominates itself
|
||||
DomSetType &BBSet = Doms[BB];
|
||||
if (BBSet != WorkingSet) {
|
||||
BBSet.swap(WorkingSet); // Constant time operation!
|
||||
Changed = true; // The sets changed.
|
||||
}
|
||||
WorkingSet.clear(); // Clear out the set for next iteration
|
||||
}
|
||||
} while (Changed);
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// Postdominator set construction. This converts the specified function to only
|
||||
// have a single exit node (return stmt), then calculates the post dominance
|
||||
// sets for the function.
|
||||
|
@ -151,146 +82,22 @@ void PostDominatorSet::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
|
|||
AU.addRequired(UnifyFunctionExitNodes::ID);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &o, const set<BasicBlock*> &BBs) {
|
||||
for (set<BasicBlock*>::const_iterator I = BBs.begin(), E = BBs.end();
|
||||
I != E; ++I) {
|
||||
o << " ";
|
||||
WriteAsOperand(o, *I, false);
|
||||
o << "\n";
|
||||
}
|
||||
return o;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void DominatorSetBase::print(std::ostream &o) const {
|
||||
for (const_iterator I = begin(), E = end(); I != E; ++I)
|
||||
o << "=============================--------------------------------\n"
|
||||
<< "\nDominator Set For Basic Block\n" << I->first
|
||||
<< "-------------------------------\n" << I->second << "\n";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||||
// ImmediateDominators Implementation
|
||||
// ImmediatePostDominators Implementation
|
||||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||||
|
||||
static RegisterAnalysis<ImmediateDominators>
|
||||
C("idom", "Immediate Dominators Construction", true);
|
||||
static RegisterAnalysis<ImmediatePostDominators>
|
||||
D("postidom", "Immediate Post-Dominators Construction", true);
|
||||
|
||||
AnalysisID ImmediateDominators::ID = C;
|
||||
AnalysisID ImmediatePostDominators::ID = D;
|
||||
|
||||
// calcIDoms - Calculate the immediate dominator mapping, given a set of
|
||||
// dominators for every basic block.
|
||||
void ImmediateDominatorsBase::calcIDoms(const DominatorSetBase &DS) {
|
||||
// Loop over all of the nodes that have dominators... figuring out the IDOM
|
||||
// for each node...
|
||||
//
|
||||
for (DominatorSet::const_iterator DI = DS.begin(), DEnd = DS.end();
|
||||
DI != DEnd; ++DI) {
|
||||
BasicBlock *BB = DI->first;
|
||||
const DominatorSet::DomSetType &Dominators = DI->second;
|
||||
unsigned DomSetSize = Dominators.size();
|
||||
if (DomSetSize == 1) continue; // Root node... IDom = null
|
||||
|
||||
// Loop over all dominators of this node. This corresponds to looping over
|
||||
// nodes in the dominator chain, looking for a node whose dominator set is
|
||||
// equal to the current nodes, except that the current node does not exist
|
||||
// in it. This means that it is one level higher in the dom chain than the
|
||||
// current node, and it is our idom!
|
||||
//
|
||||
DominatorSet::DomSetType::const_iterator I = Dominators.begin();
|
||||
DominatorSet::DomSetType::const_iterator End = Dominators.end();
|
||||
for (; I != End; ++I) { // Iterate over dominators...
|
||||
// All of our dominators should form a chain, where the number of elements
|
||||
// in the dominator set indicates what level the node is at in the chain.
|
||||
// We want the node immediately above us, so it will have an identical
|
||||
// dominator set, except that BB will not dominate it... therefore it's
|
||||
// dominator set size will be one less than BB's...
|
||||
//
|
||||
if (DS.getDominators(*I).size() == DomSetSize - 1) {
|
||||
IDoms[BB] = *I;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void ImmediateDominatorsBase::print(std::ostream &o) const {
|
||||
for (const_iterator I = begin(), E = end(); I != E; ++I)
|
||||
o << "=============================--------------------------------\n"
|
||||
<< "\nImmediate Dominator For Basic Block\n" << *I->first
|
||||
<< "is: \n" << *I->second << "\n";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||||
// DominatorTree Implementation
|
||||
// PostDominatorTree Implementation
|
||||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||||
|
||||
static RegisterAnalysis<DominatorTree>
|
||||
E("domtree", "Dominator Tree Construction", true);
|
||||
static RegisterAnalysis<PostDominatorTree>
|
||||
F("postdomtree", "Post-Dominator Tree Construction", true);
|
||||
|
||||
AnalysisID DominatorTree::ID = E;
|
||||
AnalysisID PostDominatorTree::ID = F;
|
||||
|
||||
// DominatorTreeBase::reset - Free all of the tree node memory.
|
||||
//
|
||||
void DominatorTreeBase::reset() {
|
||||
for (NodeMapType::iterator I = Nodes.begin(), E = Nodes.end(); I != E; ++I)
|
||||
delete I->second;
|
||||
Nodes.clear();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void DominatorTree::calculate(const DominatorSet &DS) {
|
||||
Nodes[Root] = new Node(Root, 0); // Add a node for the root...
|
||||
|
||||
// Iterate over all nodes in depth first order...
|
||||
for (df_iterator<BasicBlock*> I = df_begin(Root), E = df_end(Root);
|
||||
I != E; ++I) {
|
||||
BasicBlock *BB = *I;
|
||||
const DominatorSet::DomSetType &Dominators = DS.getDominators(BB);
|
||||
unsigned DomSetSize = Dominators.size();
|
||||
if (DomSetSize == 1) continue; // Root node... IDom = null
|
||||
|
||||
// Loop over all dominators of this node. This corresponds to looping over
|
||||
// nodes in the dominator chain, looking for a node whose dominator set is
|
||||
// equal to the current nodes, except that the current node does not exist
|
||||
// in it. This means that it is one level higher in the dom chain than the
|
||||
// current node, and it is our idom! We know that we have already added
|
||||
// a DominatorTree node for our idom, because the idom must be a
|
||||
// predecessor in the depth first order that we are iterating through the
|
||||
// function.
|
||||
//
|
||||
DominatorSet::DomSetType::const_iterator I = Dominators.begin();
|
||||
DominatorSet::DomSetType::const_iterator End = Dominators.end();
|
||||
for (; I != End; ++I) { // Iterate over dominators...
|
||||
// All of our dominators should form a chain, where the number of
|
||||
// elements in the dominator set indicates what level the node is at in
|
||||
// the chain. We want the node immediately above us, so it will have
|
||||
// an identical dominator set, except that BB will not dominate it...
|
||||
// therefore it's dominator set size will be one less than BB's...
|
||||
//
|
||||
if (DS.getDominators(*I).size() == DomSetSize - 1) {
|
||||
// We know that the immediate dominator should already have a node,
|
||||
// because we are traversing the CFG in depth first order!
|
||||
//
|
||||
Node *IDomNode = Nodes[*I];
|
||||
assert(IDomNode && "No node for IDOM?");
|
||||
|
||||
// Add a new tree node for this BasicBlock, and link it as a child of
|
||||
// IDomNode
|
||||
Nodes[BB] = IDomNode->addChild(new Node(BB, IDomNode));
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void PostDominatorTree::calculate(const PostDominatorSet &DS) {
|
||||
Nodes[Root] = new Node(Root, 0); // Add a node for the root...
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -339,73 +146,14 @@ void PostDominatorTree::calculate(const PostDominatorSet &DS) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &o,
|
||||
const DominatorTreeBase::Node *Node) {
|
||||
return o << Node->getNode()
|
||||
<< "\n------------------------------------------\n";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void PrintDomTree(const DominatorTreeBase::Node *N, std::ostream &o,
|
||||
unsigned Lev) {
|
||||
o << "Level #" << Lev << ": " << N;
|
||||
for (DominatorTreeBase::Node::const_iterator I = N->begin(), E = N->end();
|
||||
I != E; ++I) {
|
||||
PrintDomTree(*I, o, Lev+1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void DominatorTreeBase::print(std::ostream &o) const {
|
||||
o << "=============================--------------------------------\n"
|
||||
<< "Inorder Dominator Tree:\n";
|
||||
PrintDomTree(Nodes.find(getRoot())->second, o, 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||||
// DominanceFrontier Implementation
|
||||
// PostDominanceFrontier Implementation
|
||||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||||
|
||||
static RegisterAnalysis<DominanceFrontier>
|
||||
G("domfrontier", "Dominance Frontier Construction", true);
|
||||
static RegisterAnalysis<PostDominanceFrontier>
|
||||
H("postdomfrontier", "Post-Dominance Frontier Construction", true);
|
||||
|
||||
AnalysisID DominanceFrontier::ID = G;
|
||||
AnalysisID PostDominanceFrontier::ID = H;
|
||||
|
||||
const DominanceFrontier::DomSetType &
|
||||
DominanceFrontier::calculate(const DominatorTree &DT,
|
||||
const DominatorTree::Node *Node) {
|
||||
// Loop over CFG successors to calculate DFlocal[Node]
|
||||
BasicBlock *BB = Node->getNode();
|
||||
DomSetType &S = Frontiers[BB]; // The new set to fill in...
|
||||
|
||||
for (succ_iterator SI = succ_begin(BB), SE = succ_end(BB);
|
||||
SI != SE; ++SI) {
|
||||
// Does Node immediately dominate this successor?
|
||||
if (DT[*SI]->getIDom() != Node)
|
||||
S.insert(*SI);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// At this point, S is DFlocal. Now we union in DFup's of our children...
|
||||
// Loop through and visit the nodes that Node immediately dominates (Node's
|
||||
// children in the IDomTree)
|
||||
//
|
||||
for (DominatorTree::Node::const_iterator NI = Node->begin(), NE = Node->end();
|
||||
NI != NE; ++NI) {
|
||||
DominatorTree::Node *IDominee = *NI;
|
||||
const DomSetType &ChildDF = calculate(DT, IDominee);
|
||||
|
||||
DomSetType::const_iterator CDFI = ChildDF.begin(), CDFE = ChildDF.end();
|
||||
for (; CDFI != CDFE; ++CDFI) {
|
||||
if (!Node->dominates(DT[*CDFI]))
|
||||
S.insert(*CDFI);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return S;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const DominanceFrontier::DomSetType &
|
||||
PostDominanceFrontier::calculate(const PostDominatorTree &DT,
|
||||
const DominatorTree::Node *Node) {
|
||||
|
@ -439,12 +187,3 @@ PostDominanceFrontier::calculate(const PostDominatorTree &DT,
|
|||
|
||||
return S;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void DominanceFrontierBase::print(std::ostream &o) const {
|
||||
for (const_iterator I = begin(), E = end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
||||
o << "=============================--------------------------------\n"
|
||||
<< "\nDominance Frontier For Basic Block\n";
|
||||
WriteAsOperand(o, I->first, false);
|
||||
o << " is: \n" << I->second << "\n";
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,18 +1,17 @@
|
|||
//===- DominatorSet.cpp - Dominator Set Calculation --------------*- C++ -*--=//
|
||||
//===- Dominators.cpp - Dominator Calculation -----------------------------===//
|
||||
//
|
||||
// This file provides a simple class to calculate the dominator set of a
|
||||
// function.
|
||||
// This file implements simple dominator construction algorithms for finding
|
||||
// forward dominators. Postdominators are available in libanalysis, but are not
|
||||
// included in libvmcore, because it's not needed. Forward dominators are
|
||||
// needed to support the Verifier pass.
|
||||
//
|
||||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||||
|
||||
#include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/UnifyFunctionExitNodes.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Support/CFG.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Assembly/Writer.h"
|
||||
#include "Support/DepthFirstIterator.h"
|
||||
#include "Support/STLExtras.h"
|
||||
#include "Support/SetOperations.h"
|
||||
#include <algorithm>
|
||||
using std::set;
|
||||
|
||||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||||
|
@ -21,11 +20,7 @@ using std::set;
|
|||
|
||||
static RegisterAnalysis<DominatorSet>
|
||||
A("domset", "Dominator Set Construction", true);
|
||||
static RegisterAnalysis<PostDominatorSet>
|
||||
B("postdomset", "Post-Dominator Set Construction", true);
|
||||
|
||||
AnalysisID DominatorSet::ID = A;
|
||||
AnalysisID PostDominatorSet::ID = B;
|
||||
|
||||
// dominates - Return true if A dominates B. This performs the special checks
|
||||
// neccesary if A and B are in the same basic block.
|
||||
|
@ -88,69 +83,6 @@ bool DominatorSet::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// Postdominator set construction. This converts the specified function to only
|
||||
// have a single exit node (return stmt), then calculates the post dominance
|
||||
// sets for the function.
|
||||
//
|
||||
bool PostDominatorSet::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
|
||||
Doms.clear(); // Reset from the last time we were run...
|
||||
// Since we require that the unify all exit nodes pass has been run, we know
|
||||
// that there can be at most one return instruction in the function left.
|
||||
// Get it.
|
||||
//
|
||||
Root = getAnalysis<UnifyFunctionExitNodes>().getExitNode();
|
||||
|
||||
if (Root == 0) { // No exit node for the function? Postdomsets are all empty
|
||||
for (Function::iterator FI = F.begin(), FE = F.end(); FI != FE; ++FI)
|
||||
Doms[FI] = DomSetType();
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool Changed;
|
||||
do {
|
||||
Changed = false;
|
||||
|
||||
set<const BasicBlock*> Visited;
|
||||
DomSetType WorkingSet;
|
||||
idf_iterator<BasicBlock*> It = idf_begin(Root), End = idf_end(Root);
|
||||
for ( ; It != End; ++It) {
|
||||
BasicBlock *BB = *It;
|
||||
succ_iterator PI = succ_begin(BB), PEnd = succ_end(BB);
|
||||
if (PI != PEnd) { // Is there SOME predecessor?
|
||||
// Loop until we get to a successor that has had it's dom set filled
|
||||
// in at least once. We are guaranteed to have this because we are
|
||||
// traversing the graph in DFO and have handled start nodes specially.
|
||||
//
|
||||
while (Doms[*PI].size() == 0) ++PI;
|
||||
WorkingSet = Doms[*PI];
|
||||
|
||||
for (++PI; PI != PEnd; ++PI) { // Intersect all of the successor sets
|
||||
DomSetType &PredSet = Doms[*PI];
|
||||
if (PredSet.size())
|
||||
set_intersect(WorkingSet, PredSet);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
WorkingSet.insert(BB); // A block always dominates itself
|
||||
DomSetType &BBSet = Doms[BB];
|
||||
if (BBSet != WorkingSet) {
|
||||
BBSet.swap(WorkingSet); // Constant time operation!
|
||||
Changed = true; // The sets changed.
|
||||
}
|
||||
WorkingSet.clear(); // Clear out the set for next iteration
|
||||
}
|
||||
} while (Changed);
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// getAnalysisUsage - This obviously provides a post-dominator set, but it also
|
||||
// requires the UnifyFunctionExitNodes pass.
|
||||
//
|
||||
void PostDominatorSet::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
|
||||
AU.setPreservesAll();
|
||||
AU.addRequired(UnifyFunctionExitNodes::ID);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &o, const set<BasicBlock*> &BBs) {
|
||||
for (set<BasicBlock*>::const_iterator I = BBs.begin(), E = BBs.end();
|
||||
I != E; ++I) {
|
||||
|
@ -174,11 +106,7 @@ void DominatorSetBase::print(std::ostream &o) const {
|
|||
|
||||
static RegisterAnalysis<ImmediateDominators>
|
||||
C("idom", "Immediate Dominators Construction", true);
|
||||
static RegisterAnalysis<ImmediatePostDominators>
|
||||
D("postidom", "Immediate Post-Dominators Construction", true);
|
||||
|
||||
AnalysisID ImmediateDominators::ID = C;
|
||||
AnalysisID ImmediatePostDominators::ID = D;
|
||||
|
||||
// calcIDoms - Calculate the immediate dominator mapping, given a set of
|
||||
// dominators for every basic block.
|
||||
|
@ -230,11 +158,7 @@ void ImmediateDominatorsBase::print(std::ostream &o) const {
|
|||
|
||||
static RegisterAnalysis<DominatorTree>
|
||||
E("domtree", "Dominator Tree Construction", true);
|
||||
static RegisterAnalysis<PostDominatorTree>
|
||||
F("postdomtree", "Post-Dominator Tree Construction", true);
|
||||
|
||||
AnalysisID DominatorTree::ID = E;
|
||||
AnalysisID PostDominatorTree::ID = F;
|
||||
|
||||
// DominatorTreeBase::reset - Free all of the tree node memory.
|
||||
//
|
||||
|
@ -291,54 +215,6 @@ void DominatorTree::calculate(const DominatorSet &DS) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void PostDominatorTree::calculate(const PostDominatorSet &DS) {
|
||||
Nodes[Root] = new Node(Root, 0); // Add a node for the root...
|
||||
|
||||
if (Root) {
|
||||
// Iterate over all nodes in depth first order...
|
||||
for (idf_iterator<BasicBlock*> I = idf_begin(Root), E = idf_end(Root);
|
||||
I != E; ++I) {
|
||||
BasicBlock *BB = *I;
|
||||
const DominatorSet::DomSetType &Dominators = DS.getDominators(BB);
|
||||
unsigned DomSetSize = Dominators.size();
|
||||
if (DomSetSize == 1) continue; // Root node... IDom = null
|
||||
|
||||
// Loop over all dominators of this node. This corresponds to looping
|
||||
// over nodes in the dominator chain, looking for a node whose dominator
|
||||
// set is equal to the current nodes, except that the current node does
|
||||
// not exist in it. This means that it is one level higher in the dom
|
||||
// chain than the current node, and it is our idom! We know that we have
|
||||
// already added a DominatorTree node for our idom, because the idom must
|
||||
// be a predecessor in the depth first order that we are iterating through
|
||||
// the function.
|
||||
//
|
||||
DominatorSet::DomSetType::const_iterator I = Dominators.begin();
|
||||
DominatorSet::DomSetType::const_iterator End = Dominators.end();
|
||||
for (; I != End; ++I) { // Iterate over dominators...
|
||||
// All of our dominators should form a chain, where the number
|
||||
// of elements in the dominator set indicates what level the
|
||||
// node is at in the chain. We want the node immediately
|
||||
// above us, so it will have an identical dominator set,
|
||||
// except that BB will not dominate it... therefore it's
|
||||
// dominator set size will be one less than BB's...
|
||||
//
|
||||
if (DS.getDominators(*I).size() == DomSetSize - 1) {
|
||||
// We know that the immediate dominator should already have a node,
|
||||
// because we are traversing the CFG in depth first order!
|
||||
//
|
||||
Node *IDomNode = Nodes[*I];
|
||||
assert(IDomNode && "No node for IDOM?");
|
||||
|
||||
// Add a new tree node for this BasicBlock, and link it as a child of
|
||||
// IDomNode
|
||||
Nodes[BB] = IDomNode->addChild(new Node(BB, IDomNode));
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &o,
|
||||
const DominatorTreeBase::Node *Node) {
|
||||
return o << Node->getNode()
|
||||
|
@ -367,11 +243,7 @@ void DominatorTreeBase::print(std::ostream &o) const {
|
|||
|
||||
static RegisterAnalysis<DominanceFrontier>
|
||||
G("domfrontier", "Dominance Frontier Construction", true);
|
||||
static RegisterAnalysis<PostDominanceFrontier>
|
||||
H("postdomfrontier", "Post-Dominance Frontier Construction", true);
|
||||
|
||||
AnalysisID DominanceFrontier::ID = G;
|
||||
AnalysisID PostDominanceFrontier::ID = H;
|
||||
|
||||
const DominanceFrontier::DomSetType &
|
||||
DominanceFrontier::calculate(const DominatorTree &DT,
|
||||
|
@ -406,40 +278,6 @@ DominanceFrontier::calculate(const DominatorTree &DT,
|
|||
return S;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const DominanceFrontier::DomSetType &
|
||||
PostDominanceFrontier::calculate(const PostDominatorTree &DT,
|
||||
const DominatorTree::Node *Node) {
|
||||
// Loop over CFG successors to calculate DFlocal[Node]
|
||||
BasicBlock *BB = Node->getNode();
|
||||
DomSetType &S = Frontiers[BB]; // The new set to fill in...
|
||||
if (!Root) return S;
|
||||
|
||||
for (pred_iterator SI = pred_begin(BB), SE = pred_end(BB);
|
||||
SI != SE; ++SI) {
|
||||
// Does Node immediately dominate this predeccessor?
|
||||
if (DT[*SI]->getIDom() != Node)
|
||||
S.insert(*SI);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// At this point, S is DFlocal. Now we union in DFup's of our children...
|
||||
// Loop through and visit the nodes that Node immediately dominates (Node's
|
||||
// children in the IDomTree)
|
||||
//
|
||||
for (PostDominatorTree::Node::const_iterator
|
||||
NI = Node->begin(), NE = Node->end(); NI != NE; ++NI) {
|
||||
DominatorTree::Node *IDominee = *NI;
|
||||
const DomSetType &ChildDF = calculate(DT, IDominee);
|
||||
|
||||
DomSetType::const_iterator CDFI = ChildDF.begin(), CDFE = ChildDF.end();
|
||||
for (; CDFI != CDFE; ++CDFI) {
|
||||
if (!Node->dominates(DT[*CDFI]))
|
||||
S.insert(*CDFI);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return S;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void DominanceFrontierBase::print(std::ostream &o) const {
|
||||
for (const_iterator I = begin(), E = end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
||||
o << "=============================--------------------------------\n"
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue