Test that lldb calls the right 'printf' even when a 'printf' method exists.

This test is currently failing.  We have a bug for it, as noted.

llvm-svn: 273211

lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lang/cpp/printf/TestPrintf.py

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+from lldbsuite.test import lldbinline
+from lldbsuite.test import decorators
+
+lldbinline.MakeInlineTest(__file__, globals(), [decorators.expectedFailureAll(bugnumber="rdar://problem/24599697")] )

lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lang/cpp/printf/main.cpp

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+//===-- main.cpp ------------------------------------------------*- C++ -*-===//
+//
+//                     The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
+//
+// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
+// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+class PrintfContainer {
+public:
+    int printf() {
+        return 0;
+    }
+};
+
+int main() {
+    PrintfContainer().printf(); //% self.expect("expression -- printf(\"Hello\\n\")", substrs = ['6'])
+    return 0;
+}
+