[DAGCombiner] Add combine for (not (strict_fsetcc)) to create a strict_fsetcc with the opposite condition.

Unlike the existing code that I modified here, I only handle the
case where the strict_fsetcc has a single use. Not sure exactly
how to handle multiples uses.

Testing this on X86 is hard because we already have a other
combines that get rid of lowered version of the integer setcc that
this xor will eventually become. So this combine really just
saves a bunch of extra nodes being created. Not sure about other
targets.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71816

llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp

@@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ namespace {
     SDValue rebuildSetCC(SDValue N);
 
     bool isSetCCEquivalent(SDValue N, SDValue &LHS, SDValue &RHS,
-                           SDValue &CC) const;
+                           SDValue &CC, bool MatchStrict = false) const;
     bool isOneUseSetCC(SDValue N) const;
     bool isCheaperToUseNegatedFPOps(SDValue X, SDValue Y);
 
@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ static void zeroExtendToMatch(APInt &LHS, APInt &RHS, unsigned Offset = 0) {
 // the appropriate nodes based on the type of node we are checking. This
 // simplifies life a bit for the callers.
 bool DAGCombiner::isSetCCEquivalent(SDValue N, SDValue &LHS, SDValue &RHS,
-                                    SDValue &CC) const {
+                                    SDValue &CC, bool MatchStrict) const {
   if (N.getOpcode() == ISD::SETCC) {
     LHS = N.getOperand(0);
     RHS = N.getOperand(1);
@@ -822,6 +822,15 @@ bool DAGCombiner::isSetCCEquivalent(SDValue N, SDValue &LHS, SDValue &RHS,
     return true;
   }
 
+  if (MatchStrict &&
+      (N.getOpcode() == ISD::STRICT_FSETCC ||
+       N.getOpcode() == ISD::STRICT_FSETCCS)) {
+    LHS = N.getOperand(1);
+    RHS = N.getOperand(2);
+    CC  = N.getOperand(3);
+    return true;
+  }
+
   if (N.getOpcode() != ISD::SELECT_CC ||
       !TLI.isConstTrueVal(N.getOperand(2).getNode()) ||
       !TLI.isConstFalseVal(N.getOperand(3).getNode()))
@@ -7058,7 +7067,8 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitXOR(SDNode *N) {
   // fold !(x cc y) -> (x !cc y)
   unsigned N0Opcode = N0.getOpcode();
   SDValue LHS, RHS, CC;
-  if (TLI.isConstTrueVal(N1.getNode()) && isSetCCEquivalent(N0, LHS, RHS, CC)) {
+  if (TLI.isConstTrueVal(N1.getNode()) &&
+      isSetCCEquivalent(N0, LHS, RHS, CC, /*MatchStrict*/true)) {
     ISD::CondCode NotCC = ISD::getSetCCInverse(cast<CondCodeSDNode>(CC)->get(),
                                                LHS.getValueType());
     if (!LegalOperations ||
@@ -7071,6 +7081,21 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitXOR(SDNode *N) {
       case ISD::SELECT_CC:
         return DAG.getSelectCC(SDLoc(N0), LHS, RHS, N0.getOperand(2),
                                N0.getOperand(3), NotCC);
+      case ISD::STRICT_FSETCC:
+      case ISD::STRICT_FSETCCS: {
+        if (N0.hasOneUse()) {
+          // FIXME Can we handle multiple uses? Could we token factor the chain
+          // results from the new/old setcc?
+          SDValue SetCC = DAG.getSetCC(SDLoc(N0), VT, LHS, RHS, NotCC,
+                                       N0.getOperand(0),
+                                       N0Opcode == ISD::STRICT_FSETCCS);
+          CombineTo(N, SetCC);
+          DAG.ReplaceAllUsesOfValueWith(N0.getValue(1), SetCC.getValue(1));
+          recursivelyDeleteUnusedNodes(N0.getNode());
+          return SDValue(N, 0); // Return N so it doesn't get rechecked!
+        }
+        break;
+      }
       }
     }
   }
@@ -13541,8 +13566,12 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitBRCOND(SDNode *N) {
   }
 
   if (N1.hasOneUse()) {
+    // rebuildSetCC calls visitXor which may change the Chain when there is a
+    // STRICT_FSETCC/STRICT_FSETCCS involved. Use a handle to track changes.
+    HandleSDNode ChainHandle(Chain);
     if (SDValue NewN1 = rebuildSetCC(N1))
-      return DAG.getNode(ISD::BRCOND, SDLoc(N), MVT::Other, Chain, NewN1, N2);
+      return DAG.getNode(ISD::BRCOND, SDLoc(N), MVT::Other,
+                         ChainHandle.getValue(), NewN1, N2);
   }
 
   return SDValue();

llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/fp-strict-scalar-cmp.ll

@@ -4136,6 +4136,84 @@ define i32 @test_f64_uno_s(i32 %a, i32 %b, double %f1, double %f2) #0 {
   ret i32 %res
 }
 
+define void @foo(float %0, float %1) #0 {
+; SSE-32-LABEL: foo:
+; SSE-32:       # %bb.0:
+; SSE-32-NEXT:    movss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero
+; SSE-32-NEXT:    ucomiss {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %xmm0
+; SSE-32-NEXT:    jbe .LBB56_1
+; SSE-32-NEXT:  # %bb.2:
+; SSE-32-NEXT:    jmp bar # TAILCALL
+; SSE-32-NEXT:  .LBB56_1:
+; SSE-32-NEXT:    retl
+;
+; SSE-64-LABEL: foo:
+; SSE-64:       # %bb.0:
+; SSE-64-NEXT:    ucomiss %xmm1, %xmm0
+; SSE-64-NEXT:    jbe .LBB56_1
+; SSE-64-NEXT:  # %bb.2:
+; SSE-64-NEXT:    jmp bar # TAILCALL
+; SSE-64-NEXT:  .LBB56_1:
+; SSE-64-NEXT:    retq
+;
+; AVX-32-LABEL: foo:
+; AVX-32:       # %bb.0:
+; AVX-32-NEXT:    vmovss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero
+; AVX-32-NEXT:    vucomiss {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %xmm0
+; AVX-32-NEXT:    jbe .LBB56_1
+; AVX-32-NEXT:  # %bb.2:
+; AVX-32-NEXT:    jmp bar # TAILCALL
+; AVX-32-NEXT:  .LBB56_1:
+; AVX-32-NEXT:    retl
+;
+; AVX-64-LABEL: foo:
+; AVX-64:       # %bb.0:
+; AVX-64-NEXT:    vucomiss %xmm1, %xmm0
+; AVX-64-NEXT:    jbe .LBB56_1
+; AVX-64-NEXT:  # %bb.2:
+; AVX-64-NEXT:    jmp bar # TAILCALL
+; AVX-64-NEXT:  .LBB56_1:
+; AVX-64-NEXT:    retq
+;
+; X87-LABEL: foo:
+; X87:       # %bb.0:
+; X87-NEXT:    flds {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; X87-NEXT:    flds {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; X87-NEXT:    fucompp
+; X87-NEXT:    wait
+; X87-NEXT:    fnstsw %ax
+; X87-NEXT:    # kill: def $ah killed $ah killed $ax
+; X87-NEXT:    sahf
+; X87-NEXT:    jbe .LBB56_1
+; X87-NEXT:  # %bb.2:
+; X87-NEXT:    jmp bar # TAILCALL
+; X87-NEXT:  .LBB56_1:
+; X87-NEXT:    retl
+;
+; X87-CMOV-LABEL: foo:
+; X87-CMOV:       # %bb.0:
+; X87-CMOV-NEXT:    flds {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; X87-CMOV-NEXT:    flds {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
+; X87-CMOV-NEXT:    fucompi %st(1), %st
+; X87-CMOV-NEXT:    fstp %st(0)
+; X87-CMOV-NEXT:    wait
+; X87-CMOV-NEXT:    jbe .LBB56_1
+; X87-CMOV-NEXT:  # %bb.2:
+; X87-CMOV-NEXT:    jmp bar # TAILCALL
+; X87-CMOV-NEXT:  .LBB56_1:
+; X87-CMOV-NEXT:    retl
+  %3 = call i1 @llvm.experimental.constrained.fcmp.f32( float %0, float %1, metadata !"ogt", metadata !"fpexcept.strict") #0
+  br i1 %3, label %4, label %5
+
+4:                                                ; preds = %2
+  tail call void @bar()
+  br label %5
+
+5:                                                ; preds = %4, %2
+  ret void
+}
+declare void @bar()
+
 attributes #0 = { strictfp }
 
 declare i1 @llvm.experimental.constrained.fcmp.f32(float, float, metadata, metadata)