[TSan][libdispatch] Add interceptors for dispatch_async_and_wait()

Add interceptors for `dispatch_async_and_wait[_f]()` which was added in
macOS 10.14.  This pair of functions is similar to `dispatch_sync()`,
but does not force a context switch of the queue onto the caller thread
when the queue is active (and hence is more efficient).  For TSan, we
can apply the same semantics as for `dispatch_sync()`.

From the header docs:
> Differences with dispatch_sync()
>
> When the runtime has brought up a thread to invoke the asynchronous
> workitems already submitted to the specified queue, that servicing
> thread will also be used to execute synchronous work submitted to the
> queue with dispatch_async_and_wait().
>
> However, if the runtime has not brought up a thread to service the
> specified queue (because it has no workitems enqueued, or only
> synchronous workitems), then dispatch_async_and_wait() will invoke the
> workitem on the calling thread, similar to the behaviour of functions
> in the dispatch_sync family.

Additional context:
> The guidance is to use `dispatch_async_and_wait()` instead of
> `dispatch_sync()` when it is necessary to mix async and sync calls on
> the same queue. `dispatch_async_and_wait()` does not guarantee
> execution on the caller thread which allows to reduce context switches
> when the target queue is active.
> https://gist.github.com/tclementdev/6af616354912b0347cdf6db159c37057

rdar://35757961

Reviewed By: kubamracek

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85854

compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_libdispatch.cpp

@@ -219,6 +219,9 @@ static void invoke_and_release_block(void *param) {
 DISPATCH_INTERCEPT(dispatch, false)
 DISPATCH_INTERCEPT(dispatch_barrier, true)
 
+DISPATCH_INTERCEPT_SYNC_F(dispatch_async_and_wait_f, false)
+DISPATCH_INTERCEPT_SYNC_B(dispatch_async_and_wait, false)
+
 DECLARE_REAL(void, dispatch_after_f, dispatch_time_t when,
              dispatch_queue_t queue, void *context, dispatch_function_t work)
 
@@ -746,6 +749,8 @@ void InitializeLibdispatchInterceptors() {
   INTERCEPT_FUNCTION(dispatch_barrier_async_f);
   INTERCEPT_FUNCTION(dispatch_barrier_sync);
   INTERCEPT_FUNCTION(dispatch_barrier_sync_f);
+  INTERCEPT_FUNCTION(dispatch_async_and_wait);
+  INTERCEPT_FUNCTION(dispatch_async_and_wait_f);
   INTERCEPT_FUNCTION(dispatch_after);
   INTERCEPT_FUNCTION(dispatch_after_f);
   INTERCEPT_FUNCTION(dispatch_once);

compiler-rt/test/tsan/libdispatch/async_and_wait.c

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+// RUN: %clang_tsan %s -o %t
+// RUN: %run %t 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not='ThreadSanitizer'
+
+#include "dispatch/dispatch.h"
+
+#include <stdio.h>
+
+long global;
+
+int main() {
+  dispatch_queue_t q = dispatch_queue_create("my.queue", DISPATCH_QUEUE_SERIAL);
+  dispatch_semaphore_t s = dispatch_semaphore_create(0);
+
+  // Force queue to context switch onto separate thread.
+  dispatch_async(q, ^{
+    dispatch_semaphore_wait(s, DISPATCH_TIME_FOREVER);
+  });
+  dispatch_semaphore_signal(s);
+
+  global++;
+  dispatch_async_and_wait(q, ^{
+    // The queue continues to execute on separate thread.  This would cause a
+    // race if we had used `dispatch_async()` without the `_and_wait` part.
+    global++;
+  });
+  global++;
+
+  fprintf(stderr, "Done.\n");
+}
+
+// CHECK: Done.