forked from OSchip/llvm-project
Revert r300746 (SCEV analysis for or instructions).
There have been multiple reports of this causing problems: a compile-time explosion on the LLVM testsuite, and a stack overflow for an opencl kernel. llvm-svn: 300928
This commit is contained in:
parent
358cd9ae3a
commit
d0e6ae5678
|
@ -5328,12 +5328,28 @@ const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::createSCEV(Value *V) {
|
|||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case Instruction::Or:
|
||||
// Use ValueTracking to check whether this is actually an add.
|
||||
if (haveNoCommonBitsSet(BO->LHS, BO->RHS, getDataLayout(), &AC,
|
||||
nullptr, &DT)) {
|
||||
// There aren't any common bits set, so the add can't wrap.
|
||||
auto Flags = SCEV::NoWrapFlags(SCEV::FlagNUW | SCEV::FlagNSW);
|
||||
return getAddExpr(getSCEV(BO->LHS), getSCEV(BO->RHS), Flags);
|
||||
// If the RHS of the Or is a constant, we may have something like:
|
||||
// X*4+1 which got turned into X*4|1. Handle this as an Add so loop
|
||||
// optimizations will transparently handle this case.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// In order for this transformation to be safe, the LHS must be of the
|
||||
// form X*(2^n) and the Or constant must be less than 2^n.
|
||||
if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(BO->RHS)) {
|
||||
const SCEV *LHS = getSCEV(BO->LHS);
|
||||
const APInt &CIVal = CI->getValue();
|
||||
if (GetMinTrailingZeros(LHS) >=
|
||||
(CIVal.getBitWidth() - CIVal.countLeadingZeros())) {
|
||||
// Build a plain add SCEV.
|
||||
const SCEV *S = getAddExpr(LHS, getSCEV(CI));
|
||||
// If the LHS of the add was an addrec and it has no-wrap flags,
|
||||
// transfer the no-wrap flags, since an or won't introduce a wrap.
|
||||
if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *NewAR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S)) {
|
||||
const SCEVAddRecExpr *OldAR = cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(LHS);
|
||||
const_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr *>(NewAR)->setNoWrapFlags(
|
||||
OldAR->getNoWrapFlags());
|
||||
}
|
||||
return S;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
|
|||
; RUN: opt < %s -analyze -scalar-evolution | FileCheck %s
|
||||
|
||||
declare void @z(i32)
|
||||
declare void @z2(i64)
|
||||
|
||||
define void @fun(i1 %bool, i32 %x) {
|
||||
entry:
|
||||
br label %body
|
||||
body:
|
||||
%i = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.next, %body ]
|
||||
%bottom_zero = mul i32 %i, 2
|
||||
%a = or i32 %bottom_zero, 1
|
||||
call void @z(i32 %a)
|
||||
%bool_ext = zext i1 %bool to i32
|
||||
%b = or i32 %bool_ext, %bottom_zero
|
||||
call void @z(i32 %b)
|
||||
%shifted = lshr i32 %x, 31
|
||||
%c = or i32 %shifted, %bottom_zero
|
||||
call void @z(i32 %c)
|
||||
%i_ext = zext i32 %i to i64
|
||||
%d = or i64 %i_ext, 4294967296
|
||||
call void @z2(i64 %d)
|
||||
%i.next = add i32 %i, 1
|
||||
%cond = icmp eq i32 %i.next, 10
|
||||
br i1 %cond, label %exit, label %body
|
||||
exit:
|
||||
ret void
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
; CHECK: %a = or i32 %bottom_zero, 1
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: --> {1,+,2}<%body>
|
||||
; CHECK: %b = or i32 %bool_ext, %bottom_zero
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: --> {(zext i1 %bool to i32),+,2}
|
||||
; CHECK: %c = or i32 %shifted, %bottom_zero
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: --> {(%x /u -2147483648),+,2}<%body>
|
||||
; CHECK: %d = or i64 %i_ext, 4294967296
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: --> {4294967296,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%body>
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue