[analyzer] Make isSubRegionOf reflexive

All usages of isSubRegionOf separately check for reflexive case, and in
any case, set theory tells us that each set is a subset of itself.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42140

llvm-svn: 322752
This commit is contained in:
George Karpenkov 2018-01-17 20:27:26 +00:00
parent 1963d71cb8
commit cf9ff89663
6 changed files with 8 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ public:
const MemRegion *getBaseRegion() const;
/// Check if the region is a subregion of the given region.
/// Each region is a subregion of itself.
virtual bool isSubRegionOf(const MemRegion *R) const;
const MemRegion *StripCasts(bool StripBaseCasts = true) const;

View File

@ -101,8 +101,6 @@ static ProgramStateRef removeFromState(ProgramStateRef State,
const MemRegion *Region) {
if (!Region)
return State;
// Note: The isSubRegionOf function is not reflexive.
State = State->remove<TrackedRegionMap>(Region);
for (auto &E : State->get<TrackedRegionMap>()) {
if (E.first->isSubRegionOf(Region))
State = State->remove<TrackedRegionMap>(E.first);

View File

@ -1838,7 +1838,7 @@ UndefOrNullArgVisitor::VisitNode(const ExplodedNode *N,
const MemRegion *ArgReg = Call->getArgSVal(Idx).getAsRegion();
// Are we tracking the argument or its subregion?
if ( !ArgReg || (ArgReg != R && !R->isSubRegionOf(ArgReg->StripCasts())))
if ( !ArgReg || !R->isSubRegionOf(ArgReg->StripCasts()))
continue;
// Check the function parameter type.

View File

@ -103,15 +103,15 @@ MemRegionManager::~MemRegionManager() {
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
bool SubRegion::isSubRegionOf(const MemRegion* R) const {
const MemRegion* r = getSuperRegion();
while (r != nullptr) {
const MemRegion* r = this;
do {
if (r == R)
return true;
if (const SubRegion* sr = dyn_cast<SubRegion>(r))
r = sr->getSuperRegion();
else
break;
}
} while (r != nullptr);
return false;
}

View File

@ -781,8 +781,7 @@ bool ProgramState::isTainted(SymbolRef Sym, TaintTagType Kind) const {
// complete. For example, this would not currently identify
// overlapping fields in a union as tainted. To identify this we can
// check for overlapping/nested byte offsets.
if (Kind == I.second &&
(R == I.first || R->isSubRegionOf(I.first)))
if (Kind == I.second && R->isSubRegionOf(I.first))
return true;
}
}

View File

@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ collectSubRegionBindings(SmallVectorImpl<BindingPair> &Bindings,
} else if (NextKey.hasSymbolicOffset()) {
const MemRegion *Base = NextKey.getConcreteOffsetRegion();
if (Top->isSubRegionOf(Base)) {
if (Top->isSubRegionOf(Base) && Top != Base) {
// Case 3: The next key is symbolic and we just changed something within
// its concrete region. We don't know if the binding is still valid, so
// we'll be conservative and include it.
@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ collectSubRegionBindings(SmallVectorImpl<BindingPair> &Bindings,
} else if (const SubRegion *BaseSR = dyn_cast<SubRegion>(Base)) {
// Case 4: The next key is symbolic, but we changed a known
// super-region. In this case the binding is certainly included.
if (Top == Base || BaseSR->isSubRegionOf(Top))
if (BaseSR->isSubRegionOf(Top))
if (isCompatibleWithFields(NextKey, FieldsInSymbolicSubregions))
Bindings.push_back(*I);
}