[analyzer] Fix an assertion failure if plugins added dependencies

Ideally, there is no reason behind not being able to depend on checkers that
come from a different plugin (or on builtin checkers) -- however, this is only
possible if all checkers are added to the registry before resolving checker
dependencies. Since I used a binary search in my addDependency method, this also
resulted in an assertion failure (due to CheckerRegistry::Checkers not being
sorted), since the function used by plugins to register their checkers
(clang_registerCheckers) calls addDependency.

This patch resolves this issue by only noting which dependencies have to
established when addDependency is called, and resolves them at a later stage
when no more checkers are added to the registry, by which point
CheckerRegistry::Checkers is already sorted.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59461

llvm-svn: 358750
This commit is contained in:
Kristof Umann 2019-04-19 11:01:35 +00:00
parent 99f641ccad
commit cd3f147439
3 changed files with 44 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@ -195,6 +195,12 @@ private:
CheckerInfoList Checkers;
llvm::StringMap<size_t> PackageSizes;
/// Contains all (Dependendent checker, Dependency) pairs. We need this, as
/// we'll resolve dependencies after all checkers were added first.
llvm::SmallVector<std::pair<StringRef, StringRef>, 0> Dependencies;
void resolveDependencies();
DiagnosticsEngine &Diags;
AnalyzerOptions &AnOpts;
const LangOptions &LangOpts;

View File

@ -177,6 +177,8 @@ CheckerRegistry::CheckerRegistry(
#undef CHECKER_DEPENDENCY
#undef GET_CHECKER_DEPENDENCIES
resolveDependencies();
// Parse '-analyzer-checker' and '-analyzer-disable-checker' options from the
// command line.
for (const std::pair<std::string, bool> &Opt : AnOpts.CheckersControlList) {
@ -278,18 +280,26 @@ void CheckerRegistry::addChecker(InitializationFunction Rfn,
}
}
void CheckerRegistry::resolveDependencies() {
for (const std::pair<StringRef, StringRef> &Entry : Dependencies) {
auto CheckerIt = binaryFind(Checkers, Entry.first);
assert(CheckerIt != Checkers.end() && CheckerIt->FullName == Entry.first &&
"Failed to find the checker while attempting to set up its "
"dependencies!");
auto DependencyIt = binaryFind(Checkers, Entry.second);
assert(DependencyIt != Checkers.end() &&
DependencyIt->FullName == Entry.second &&
"Failed to find the dependency of a checker!");
CheckerIt->Dependencies.emplace_back(&*DependencyIt);
}
Dependencies.clear();
}
void CheckerRegistry::addDependency(StringRef FullName, StringRef Dependency) {
auto CheckerIt = binaryFind(Checkers, FullName);
assert(CheckerIt != Checkers.end() && CheckerIt->FullName == FullName &&
"Failed to find the checker while attempting to set up its "
"dependencies!");
auto DependencyIt = binaryFind(Checkers, Dependency);
assert(DependencyIt != Checkers.end() &&
DependencyIt->FullName == Dependency &&
"Failed to find the dependency of a checker!");
CheckerIt->Dependencies.emplace_back(&*DependencyIt);
Dependencies.emplace_back(FullName, Dependency);
}
void CheckerRegistry::initializeManager(CheckerManager &CheckerMgr) const {

View File

@ -1,3 +1,20 @@
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 %s \
// RUN: -analyzer-checker=core \
// RUN: -analyzer-checker=nullability.NullReturnedFromNonnull
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 %s \
// RUN: -analyzer-checker=osx.cocoa.RetainCount \
// RUN: -analyzer-list-enabled-checkers \
// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-IMPLICITLY-ENABLED
// CHECK-IMPLICITLY-ENABLED: osx.cocoa.RetainCountBase
// CHECK-IMPLICITLY-ENABLED: osx.cocoa.RetainCount
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 %s \
// RUN: -analyzer-checker=osx.cocoa.RetainCount \
// RUN: -analyzer-disable-checker=osx.cocoa.RetainCountBase \
// RUN: -analyzer-list-enabled-checkers \
// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-IMPLICITLY-DISABLED
// CHECK-IMPLICITLY-DISABLED-NOT: osx.cocoa.RetainCountBase
// CHECK-IMPLICITLY-DISABLED-NOT: osx.cocoa.RetainCount