[X86] Fix some cppcheck "Local variable name shadows outer variable" warnings. NFCI.

llvm-svn: 359976
This commit is contained in:
Simon Pilgrim 2019-05-05 12:00:14 +00:00
parent 5b05f20a3a
commit cbcd9b1b92
1 changed files with 42 additions and 44 deletions

View File

@ -3431,11 +3431,11 @@ SDValue X86TargetLowering::LowerFormalArguments(
}
// Copy all forwards from physical to virtual registers.
for (ForwardedRegister &F : Forwards) {
for (ForwardedRegister &FR : Forwards) {
// FIXME: Can we use a less constrained schedule?
SDValue RegVal = DAG.getCopyFromReg(Chain, dl, F.VReg, F.VT);
F.VReg = MF.getRegInfo().createVirtualRegister(getRegClassFor(F.VT));
Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, F.VReg, RegVal);
SDValue RegVal = DAG.getCopyFromReg(Chain, dl, FR.VReg, FR.VT);
FR.VReg = MF.getRegInfo().createVirtualRegister(getRegClassFor(FR.VT));
Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, FR.VReg, RegVal);
}
}
@ -17874,23 +17874,23 @@ SDValue X86TargetLowering::BuildFILD(SDValue Op, EVT SrcVT, SDValue Chain,
else
Tys = DAG.getVTList(Op.getValueType(), MVT::Other);
unsigned ByteSize = SrcVT.getSizeInBits()/8;
unsigned ByteSize = SrcVT.getSizeInBits() / 8;
FrameIndexSDNode *FI = dyn_cast<FrameIndexSDNode>(StackSlot);
MachineMemOperand *MMO;
MachineMemOperand *LoadMMO;
if (FI) {
int SSFI = FI->getIndex();
MMO = DAG.getMachineFunction().getMachineMemOperand(
LoadMMO = DAG.getMachineFunction().getMachineMemOperand(
MachinePointerInfo::getFixedStack(DAG.getMachineFunction(), SSFI),
MachineMemOperand::MOLoad, ByteSize, ByteSize);
} else {
MMO = cast<LoadSDNode>(StackSlot)->getMemOperand();
LoadMMO = cast<LoadSDNode>(StackSlot)->getMemOperand();
StackSlot = StackSlot.getOperand(1);
}
SDValue Ops[] = { Chain, StackSlot };
SDValue Result = DAG.getMemIntrinsicNode(useSSE ? X86ISD::FILD_FLAG :
X86ISD::FILD, DL,
Tys, Ops, SrcVT, MMO);
SDValue FILDOps[] = {Chain, StackSlot};
SDValue Result =
DAG.getMemIntrinsicNode(useSSE ? X86ISD::FILD_FLAG : X86ISD::FILD, DL,
Tys, FILDOps, SrcVT, LoadMMO);
if (useSSE) {
Chain = Result.getValue(1);
@ -17900,18 +17900,18 @@ SDValue X86TargetLowering::BuildFILD(SDValue Op, EVT SrcVT, SDValue Chain,
// shouldn't be necessary except that RFP cannot be live across
// multiple blocks. When stackifier is fixed, they can be uncoupled.
MachineFunction &MF = DAG.getMachineFunction();
unsigned SSFISize = Op.getValueSizeInBits()/8;
unsigned SSFISize = Op.getValueSizeInBits() / 8;
int SSFI = MF.getFrameInfo().CreateStackObject(SSFISize, SSFISize, false);
auto PtrVT = getPointerTy(MF.getDataLayout());
SDValue StackSlot = DAG.getFrameIndex(SSFI, PtrVT);
Tys = DAG.getVTList(MVT::Other);
SDValue Ops[] = { Chain, Result, StackSlot, InFlag };
MachineMemOperand *MMO = DAG.getMachineFunction().getMachineMemOperand(
SDValue FSTOps[] = {Chain, Result, StackSlot, InFlag};
MachineMemOperand *StoreMMO = DAG.getMachineFunction().getMachineMemOperand(
MachinePointerInfo::getFixedStack(DAG.getMachineFunction(), SSFI),
MachineMemOperand::MOStore, SSFISize, SSFISize);
Chain = DAG.getMemIntrinsicNode(X86ISD::FST, DL, Tys,
Ops, Op.getValueType(), MMO);
Chain = DAG.getMemIntrinsicNode(X86ISD::FST, DL, Tys, FSTOps,
Op.getValueType(), StoreMMO);
Result = DAG.getLoad(
Op.getValueType(), DL, Chain, StackSlot,
MachinePointerInfo::getFixedStack(DAG.getMachineFunction(), SSFI));
@ -30098,10 +30098,9 @@ X86TargetLowering::EmitSjLjDispatchBlock(MachineInstr &MI,
MachineBasicBlock *BB) const {
DebugLoc DL = MI.getDebugLoc();
MachineFunction *MF = BB->getParent();
MachineFrameInfo &MFI = MF->getFrameInfo();
MachineRegisterInfo *MRI = &MF->getRegInfo();
const X86InstrInfo *TII = Subtarget.getInstrInfo();
int FI = MFI.getFunctionContextIndex();
int FI = MF->getFrameInfo().getFunctionContextIndex();
// Get a mapping of the call site numbers to all of the landing pads they're
// associated with.
@ -36546,8 +36545,8 @@ static SDValue combineMulToPMADDWD(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
// Use SplitOpsAndApply to handle AVX splitting.
auto PMADDWDBuilder = [](SelectionDAG &DAG, const SDLoc &DL,
ArrayRef<SDValue> Ops) {
MVT VT = MVT::getVectorVT(MVT::i32, Ops[0].getValueSizeInBits() / 32);
return DAG.getNode(X86ISD::VPMADDWD, DL, VT, Ops);
MVT OpVT = MVT::getVectorVT(MVT::i32, Ops[0].getValueSizeInBits() / 32);
return DAG.getNode(X86ISD::VPMADDWD, DL, OpVT, Ops);
};
return SplitOpsAndApply(DAG, Subtarget, SDLoc(N), VT,
{ DAG.getBitcast(WVT, N0), DAG.getBitcast(WVT, N1) },
@ -37980,8 +37979,7 @@ static SDValue combineOrCmpEqZeroToCtlzSrl(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
// Swap rhs with lhs to match or(setcc(eq, cmp, 0), or).
if (RHS->getOpcode() == ISD::OR)
std::swap(LHS, RHS);
EVT VT = OR->getValueType(0);
SDValue NewRHS = lowerX86CmpEqZeroToCtlzSrl(RHS, VT, DAG);
NewRHS = lowerX86CmpEqZeroToCtlzSrl(RHS, VT, DAG);
if (!NewRHS)
return SDValue();
Ret = DAG.getNode(ISD::OR, SDLoc(OR), VT, Ret, NewRHS);
@ -39490,7 +39488,7 @@ static SDValue combineTruncatedArithmetic(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
const SDLoc &DL) {
assert(N->getOpcode() == ISD::TRUNCATE && "Wrong opcode");
SDValue Src = N->getOperand(0);
unsigned Opcode = Src.getOpcode();
unsigned SrcOpcode = Src.getOpcode();
const TargetLowering &TLI = DAG.getTargetLoweringInfo();
EVT VT = N->getValueType(0);
@ -39518,7 +39516,7 @@ static SDValue combineTruncatedArithmetic(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
auto TruncateArithmetic = [&](SDValue N0, SDValue N1) {
SDValue Trunc0 = DAG.getNode(ISD::TRUNCATE, DL, VT, N0);
SDValue Trunc1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::TRUNCATE, DL, VT, N1);
return DAG.getNode(Opcode, DL, VT, Trunc0, Trunc1);
return DAG.getNode(SrcOpcode, DL, VT, Trunc0, Trunc1);
};
// Don't combine if the operation has other uses.
@ -39533,13 +39531,13 @@ static SDValue combineTruncatedArithmetic(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
// In most cases its only worth pre-truncating if we're only facing the cost
// of one truncation.
// i.e. if one of the inputs will constant fold or the input is repeated.
switch (Opcode) {
switch (SrcOpcode) {
case ISD::AND:
case ISD::XOR:
case ISD::OR: {
SDValue Op0 = Src.getOperand(0);
SDValue Op1 = Src.getOperand(1);
if (TLI.isOperationLegalOrPromote(Opcode, VT) &&
if (TLI.isOperationLegalOrPromote(SrcOpcode, VT) &&
(Op0 == Op1 || IsFreeTruncation(Op0) || IsFreeTruncation(Op1)))
return TruncateArithmetic(Op0, Op1);
break;
@ -39548,14 +39546,15 @@ static SDValue combineTruncatedArithmetic(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
case ISD::MUL:
// X86 is rubbish at scalar and vector i64 multiplies (until AVX512DQ) - its
// better to truncate if we have the chance.
if (SrcVT.getScalarType() == MVT::i64 && TLI.isOperationLegal(Opcode, VT) &&
!TLI.isOperationLegal(Opcode, SrcVT))
if (SrcVT.getScalarType() == MVT::i64 &&
TLI.isOperationLegal(SrcOpcode, VT) &&
!TLI.isOperationLegal(SrcOpcode, SrcVT))
return TruncateArithmetic(Src.getOperand(0), Src.getOperand(1));
LLVM_FALLTHROUGH;
case ISD::ADD: {
SDValue Op0 = Src.getOperand(0);
SDValue Op1 = Src.getOperand(1);
if (TLI.isOperationLegal(Opcode, VT) &&
if (TLI.isOperationLegal(SrcOpcode, VT) &&
(Op0 == Op1 || IsFreeTruncation(Op0) || IsFreeTruncation(Op1)))
return TruncateArithmetic(Op0, Op1);
break;
@ -39565,7 +39564,7 @@ static SDValue combineTruncatedArithmetic(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
// truncatable to avoid interfering with combineSubToSubus.
SDValue Op0 = Src.getOperand(0);
SDValue Op1 = Src.getOperand(1);
if (TLI.isOperationLegal(Opcode, VT) &&
if (TLI.isOperationLegal(SrcOpcode, VT) &&
(Op0 == Op1 || (IsFreeTruncation(Op0) && IsFreeTruncation(Op1))))
return TruncateArithmetic(Op0, Op1);
break;
@ -40775,13 +40774,13 @@ static SDValue combineToExtendVectorInReg(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
SDLoc DL(N);
auto ExtendVecSize = [&DAG](const SDLoc &DL, SDValue N, unsigned Size) {
EVT InVT = N.getValueType();
EVT OutVT = EVT::getVectorVT(*DAG.getContext(), InVT.getScalarType(),
Size / InVT.getScalarSizeInBits());
SmallVector<SDValue, 8> Opnds(Size / InVT.getSizeInBits(),
DAG.getUNDEF(InVT));
EVT SrcVT = N.getValueType();
EVT DstVT = EVT::getVectorVT(*DAG.getContext(), SrcVT.getScalarType(),
Size / SrcVT.getScalarSizeInBits());
SmallVector<SDValue, 8> Opnds(Size / SrcVT.getSizeInBits(),
DAG.getUNDEF(SrcVT));
Opnds[0] = N;
return DAG.getNode(ISD::CONCAT_VECTORS, DL, OutVT, Opnds);
return DAG.getNode(ISD::CONCAT_VECTORS, DL, DstVT, Opnds);
};
// If target-size is less than 128-bits, extend to a type that would extend
@ -41638,7 +41637,6 @@ static SDValue combineCMP(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
if ((Op.getOpcode() == ISD::SRL || Op.getOpcode() == ISD::SHL) &&
Op.hasOneUse() && isa<ConstantSDNode>(Op.getOperand(1)) &&
onlyZeroFlagUsed(SDValue(N, 0))) {
EVT VT = Op.getValueType();
unsigned BitWidth = VT.getSizeInBits();
const APInt &ShAmt = Op.getConstantOperandAPInt(1);
if (ShAmt.ult(BitWidth)) { // Avoid undefined shifts.
@ -41989,8 +41987,8 @@ static SDValue combineLoopMAddPattern(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
// Madd vector size is half of the original vector size
auto PMADDWDBuilder = [](SelectionDAG &DAG, const SDLoc &DL,
ArrayRef<SDValue> Ops) {
MVT VT = MVT::getVectorVT(MVT::i32, Ops[0].getValueSizeInBits() / 32);
return DAG.getNode(X86ISD::VPMADDWD, DL, VT, Ops);
MVT OpVT = MVT::getVectorVT(MVT::i32, Ops[0].getValueSizeInBits() / 32);
return DAG.getNode(X86ISD::VPMADDWD, DL, OpVT, Ops);
};
auto BuildPMADDWD = [&](SDValue Mul) {
@ -42338,12 +42336,12 @@ static SDValue matchPMADDWD_2(SelectionDAG &DAG, SDValue N0, SDValue N1,
ArrayRef<SDValue> Ops) {
// Shrink by adding truncate nodes and let DAGCombine fold with the
// sources.
EVT InVT = Ops[0].getValueType();
assert(InVT.getScalarType() == MVT::i16 &&
EVT OpVT = Ops[0].getValueType();
assert(OpVT.getScalarType() == MVT::i16 &&
"Unexpected scalar element type");
assert(InVT == Ops[1].getValueType() && "Operands' types mismatch");
assert(OpVT == Ops[1].getValueType() && "Operands' types mismatch");
EVT ResVT = EVT::getVectorVT(*DAG.getContext(), MVT::i32,
InVT.getVectorNumElements() / 2);
OpVT.getVectorNumElements() / 2);
return DAG.getNode(X86ISD::VPMADDWD, DL, ResVT, Ops[0], Ops[1]);
};
return SplitOpsAndApply(DAG, Subtarget, DL, VT, { In0, In1 },