forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[DependenceAnalysis] Make sure base objects are the same when comparing GEPs
The dependence analysis was returning incorrect information when using the GEPs to compute dependences. The analysis uses the GEP indices under certain conditions, but was doing it incorrectly when the base objects of the GEP are aliases, but pointing to different locations in the same array. This patch adds another check for the base objects. If the base pointer SCEVs are not equal, then the dependence analysis should fall back on the path that uses the whole SCEV for the dependence check. This fixes PR33567. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34702 llvm-svn: 307203
This commit is contained in:
parent
c0fe1f211a
commit
cb8c7b912d
|
@ -3342,7 +3342,8 @@ DependenceInfo::depends(Instruction *Src, Instruction *Dst,
|
|||
|
||||
UsefulGEP = isLoopInvariant(SrcPtrSCEV, LI->getLoopFor(Src->getParent())) &&
|
||||
isLoopInvariant(DstPtrSCEV, LI->getLoopFor(Dst->getParent())) &&
|
||||
(SrcGEP->getNumOperands() == DstGEP->getNumOperands());
|
||||
(SrcGEP->getNumOperands() == DstGEP->getNumOperands()) &&
|
||||
isKnownPredicate(CmpInst::ICMP_EQ, SrcPtrSCEV, DstPtrSCEV);
|
||||
}
|
||||
unsigned Pairs = UsefulGEP ? SrcGEP->idx_end() - SrcGEP->idx_begin() : 1;
|
||||
SmallVector<Subscript, 4> Pair(Pairs);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
|
|||
; RUN: opt < %s -analyze -basicaa -da | FileCheck %s
|
||||
|
||||
; Test that the dependence analysis generates the correct results when using
|
||||
; an aliased object that points to a different element in the same array.
|
||||
; PR33567 - https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33567
|
||||
|
||||
; void test1(int *A, int *B, int N) {
|
||||
; int *top = A;
|
||||
; int *bot = A + N/2;
|
||||
; for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
|
||||
; B[i] = top[i] + bot[i];
|
||||
; }
|
||||
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: test1
|
||||
; CHECK: da analyze - input [*|<]!
|
||||
|
||||
define void @test1(i32* nocapture %A, i32* nocapture %B, i32 %N) #0 {
|
||||
entry:
|
||||
%cmp9 = icmp sgt i32 %N, 0
|
||||
br i1 %cmp9, label %for.body.lr.ph, label %for.end
|
||||
|
||||
for.body.lr.ph:
|
||||
%div = sdiv i32 %N, 2
|
||||
%bot.gep = getelementptr i32, i32* %A, i32 %div
|
||||
br label %for.body
|
||||
|
||||
for.body:
|
||||
%i = phi i32 [ 0, %for.body.lr.ph ], [ %inc, %for.body ]
|
||||
%gep.0 = getelementptr i32, i32* %A, i32 %i
|
||||
%gep.1 = getelementptr i32, i32* %bot.gep, i32 %i
|
||||
%gep.B = getelementptr i32, i32* %B, i32 %i
|
||||
%0 = load i32, i32* %gep.0, align 4
|
||||
%1 = load i32, i32* %gep.1, align 4
|
||||
%add = add nsw i32 %1, %0
|
||||
store i32 %add, i32* %gep.B, align 4
|
||||
%inc = add nsw i32 %i, 1
|
||||
%exitcond = icmp eq i32 %inc, %N
|
||||
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.end, label %for.body
|
||||
|
||||
for.end:
|
||||
ret void
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
; void test2(int *A, unsigned n) {
|
||||
; int *B = A + 1;
|
||||
; for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
|
||||
; A[i] = B[i];
|
||||
; }
|
||||
; }
|
||||
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: test2
|
||||
; CHECK: da analyze - consistent anti [1]!
|
||||
|
||||
define void @test2(i32*, i32) #3 {
|
||||
%3 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %0, i64 1
|
||||
br label %4
|
||||
|
||||
; <label>:4:
|
||||
%.0 = phi i32 [ 0, %2 ], [ %14, %13 ]
|
||||
%5 = sub i32 %1, 1
|
||||
%6 = icmp ult i32 %.0, %5
|
||||
br i1 %6, label %7, label %15
|
||||
|
||||
; <label>:7:
|
||||
%8 = zext i32 %.0 to i64
|
||||
%9 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %3, i64 %8
|
||||
%10 = load i32, i32* %9, align 4
|
||||
%11 = zext i32 %.0 to i64
|
||||
%12 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %0, i64 %11
|
||||
store i32 %10, i32* %12, align 4
|
||||
br label %13
|
||||
|
||||
; <label>:13:
|
||||
%14 = add i32 %.0, 1
|
||||
br label %4
|
||||
|
||||
; <label>:15:
|
||||
ret void
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue