[analyzer] Improve CloneChecker diagnostics

Highlight code clones referenced by the warning message with the help of
the extra notes feature recently introduced in r283092.

Change warning text to more clang-ish. Remove suggestions from the copy-paste
error checker diagnostics, because currently our suggestions are strictly 50%
wrong (we do not know which of the two code clones contains the error), and
for that reason we should not sound as if we're actually suggesting this.
Hopefully a better solution would bring them back.

Make sure the suspicious clone pair structure always mentions
the correct variable for the second clone.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24916

llvm-svn: 283094
This commit is contained in:
Artem Dergachev 2016-10-03 08:11:50 +00:00
parent 918602df8d
commit c87d2a613e
14 changed files with 289 additions and 90 deletions

View File

@ -128,6 +128,10 @@ public:
/// This method should only be called on a non-empty StmtSequence object.
SourceLocation getEndLoc() const;
/// Returns the source range of the whole sequence - from the beginning
/// of the first statement to the end of the last statement.
SourceRange getSourceRange() const;
bool operator==(const StmtSequence &Other) const {
return std::tie(S, StartIndex, EndIndex) ==
std::tie(Other.S, Other.StartIndex, Other.EndIndex);
@ -250,14 +254,14 @@ public:
/// The variable which referencing in this clone was against the pattern.
const VarDecl *Variable;
/// Where the variable was referenced.
SourceRange VarRange;
const Stmt *Mention;
/// The variable that should have been referenced to follow the pattern.
/// If Suggestion is a nullptr then it's not possible to fix the pattern
/// by referencing a different variable in this clone.
const VarDecl *Suggestion;
SuspiciousCloneInfo(const VarDecl *Variable, SourceRange Range,
SuspiciousCloneInfo(const VarDecl *Variable, const Stmt *Mention,
const VarDecl *Suggestion)
: Variable(Variable), VarRange(Range), Suggestion(Suggestion) {}
: Variable(Variable), Mention(Mention), Suggestion(Suggestion) {}
SuspiciousCloneInfo() {}
};
/// The first clone in the pair which always has a suggested variable.

View File

@ -82,6 +82,10 @@ SourceLocation StmtSequence::getStartLoc() const {
SourceLocation StmtSequence::getEndLoc() const { return back()->getLocEnd(); }
SourceRange StmtSequence::getSourceRange() const {
return SourceRange(getStartLoc(), getEndLoc());
}
namespace {
/// \brief Analyzes the pattern of the referenced variables in a statement.
@ -91,11 +95,11 @@ class VariablePattern {
struct VariableOccurence {
/// The index of the associated VarDecl in the Variables vector.
size_t KindID;
/// The source range in the code where the variable was referenced.
SourceRange Range;
/// The statement in the code where the variable was referenced.
const Stmt *Mention;
VariableOccurence(size_t KindID, SourceRange Range)
: KindID(KindID), Range(Range) {}
VariableOccurence(size_t KindID, const Stmt *Mention)
: KindID(KindID), Mention(Mention) {}
};
/// All occurences of referenced variables in the order of appearance.
@ -107,19 +111,19 @@ class VariablePattern {
/// \brief Adds a new variable referenced to this pattern.
/// \param VarDecl The declaration of the variable that is referenced.
/// \param Range The SourceRange where this variable is referenced.
void addVariableOccurence(const VarDecl *VarDecl, SourceRange Range) {
void addVariableOccurence(const VarDecl *VarDecl, const Stmt *Mention) {
// First check if we already reference this variable
for (size_t KindIndex = 0; KindIndex < Variables.size(); ++KindIndex) {
if (Variables[KindIndex] == VarDecl) {
// If yes, add a new occurence that points to the existing entry in
// the Variables vector.
Occurences.emplace_back(KindIndex, Range);
Occurences.emplace_back(KindIndex, Mention);
return;
}
}
// If this variable wasn't already referenced, add it to the list of
// referenced variables and add a occurence that points to this new entry.
Occurences.emplace_back(Variables.size(), Range);
Occurences.emplace_back(Variables.size(), Mention);
Variables.push_back(VarDecl);
}
@ -134,7 +138,7 @@ class VariablePattern {
// Check if S is a reference to a variable. If yes, add it to the pattern.
if (auto D = dyn_cast<DeclRefExpr>(S)) {
if (auto VD = dyn_cast<VarDecl>(D->getDecl()->getCanonicalDecl()))
addVariableOccurence(VD, D->getSourceRange());
addVariableOccurence(VD, D);
}
// Recursively check all children of the given statement.
@ -208,7 +212,7 @@ public:
// Store information about the first clone.
FirstMismatch->FirstCloneInfo =
CloneDetector::SuspiciousClonePair::SuspiciousCloneInfo(
Variables[ThisOccurence.KindID], ThisOccurence.Range,
Variables[ThisOccurence.KindID], ThisOccurence.Mention,
FirstSuggestion);
// Same as above but with the other clone. We do this for both clones as
@ -221,7 +225,7 @@ public:
// Store information about the second clone.
FirstMismatch->SecondCloneInfo =
CloneDetector::SuspiciousClonePair::SuspiciousCloneInfo(
Variables[ThisOccurence.KindID], OtherOccurence.Range,
Other.Variables[OtherOccurence.KindID], OtherOccurence.Mention,
SecondSuggestion);
// SuspiciousClonePair guarantees that the first clone always has a

View File

@ -16,8 +16,10 @@
#include "ClangSACheckers.h"
#include "clang/Analysis/CloneDetection.h"
#include "clang/Basic/Diagnostic.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter/BugType.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/Checker.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/CheckerManager.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/AnalysisManager.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CheckerContext.h"
using namespace clang;
@ -27,6 +29,7 @@ namespace {
class CloneChecker
: public Checker<check::ASTCodeBody, check::EndOfTranslationUnit> {
mutable CloneDetector Detector;
mutable std::unique_ptr<BugType> BT_Exact, BT_Suspicious;
public:
void checkASTCodeBody(const Decl *D, AnalysisManager &Mgr,
@ -36,12 +39,12 @@ public:
AnalysisManager &Mgr, BugReporter &BR) const;
/// \brief Reports all clones to the user.
void reportClones(SourceManager &SM, AnalysisManager &Mgr,
void reportClones(BugReporter &BR, AnalysisManager &Mgr,
int MinComplexity) const;
/// \brief Reports only suspicious clones to the user along with informaton
/// that explain why they are suspicious.
void reportSuspiciousClones(SourceManager &SM, AnalysisManager &Mgr,
void reportSuspiciousClones(BugReporter &BR, AnalysisManager &Mgr,
int MinComplexity) const;
};
} // end anonymous namespace
@ -70,79 +73,82 @@ void CloneChecker::checkEndOfTranslationUnit(const TranslationUnitDecl *TU,
"ReportNormalClones", true, this);
if (ReportSuspiciousClones)
reportSuspiciousClones(BR.getSourceManager(), Mgr, MinComplexity);
reportSuspiciousClones(BR, Mgr, MinComplexity);
if (ReportNormalClones)
reportClones(BR.getSourceManager(), Mgr, MinComplexity);
reportClones(BR, Mgr, MinComplexity);
}
void CloneChecker::reportClones(SourceManager &SM, AnalysisManager &Mgr,
static PathDiagnosticLocation makeLocation(const StmtSequence &S,
AnalysisManager &Mgr) {
ASTContext &ACtx = Mgr.getASTContext();
return PathDiagnosticLocation::createBegin(
S.front(), ACtx.getSourceManager(),
Mgr.getAnalysisDeclContext(ACtx.getTranslationUnitDecl()));
}
void CloneChecker::reportClones(BugReporter &BR, AnalysisManager &Mgr,
int MinComplexity) const {
std::vector<CloneDetector::CloneGroup> CloneGroups;
Detector.findClones(CloneGroups, MinComplexity);
DiagnosticsEngine &DiagEngine = Mgr.getDiagnostic();
unsigned WarnID = DiagEngine.getCustomDiagID(DiagnosticsEngine::Warning,
"Detected code clone.");
unsigned NoteID = DiagEngine.getCustomDiagID(DiagnosticsEngine::Note,
"Related code clone is here.");
if (!BT_Exact)
BT_Exact.reset(new BugType(this, "Exact code clone", "Code clone"));
for (CloneDetector::CloneGroup &Group : CloneGroups) {
// We group the clones by printing the first as a warning and all others
// as a note.
DiagEngine.Report(Group.Sequences.front().getStartLoc(), WarnID);
for (unsigned i = 1; i < Group.Sequences.size(); ++i) {
DiagEngine.Report(Group.Sequences[i].getStartLoc(), NoteID);
}
auto R = llvm::make_unique<BugReport>(
*BT_Exact, "Duplicate code detected",
makeLocation(Group.Sequences.front(), Mgr));
R->addRange(Group.Sequences.front().getSourceRange());
for (unsigned i = 1; i < Group.Sequences.size(); ++i)
R->addNote("Similar code here",
makeLocation(Group.Sequences[i], Mgr),
Group.Sequences[i].getSourceRange());
BR.emitReport(std::move(R));
}
}
void CloneChecker::reportSuspiciousClones(SourceManager &SM,
void CloneChecker::reportSuspiciousClones(BugReporter &BR,
AnalysisManager &Mgr,
int MinComplexity) const {
std::vector<CloneDetector::SuspiciousClonePair> Clones;
Detector.findSuspiciousClones(Clones, MinComplexity);
DiagnosticsEngine &DiagEngine = Mgr.getDiagnostic();
if (!BT_Suspicious)
BT_Suspicious.reset(
new BugType(this, "Suspicious code clone", "Code clone"));
auto SuspiciousCloneWarning = DiagEngine.getCustomDiagID(
DiagnosticsEngine::Warning, "suspicious code clone detected; did you "
"mean to use %0?");
auto RelatedCloneNote = DiagEngine.getCustomDiagID(
DiagnosticsEngine::Note, "suggestion is based on the usage of this "
"variable in a similar piece of code");
auto RelatedSuspiciousCloneNote = DiagEngine.getCustomDiagID(
DiagnosticsEngine::Note, "suggestion is based on the usage of this "
"variable in a similar piece of code; did you "
"mean to use %0?");
ASTContext &ACtx = BR.getContext();
SourceManager &SM = ACtx.getSourceManager();
AnalysisDeclContext *ADC =
Mgr.getAnalysisDeclContext(ACtx.getTranslationUnitDecl());
for (CloneDetector::SuspiciousClonePair &Pair : Clones) {
// The first clone always has a suggestion and we report it to the user
// along with the place where the suggestion should be used.
DiagEngine.Report(Pair.FirstCloneInfo.VarRange.getBegin(),
SuspiciousCloneWarning)
<< Pair.FirstCloneInfo.VarRange << Pair.FirstCloneInfo.Suggestion;
// FIXME: We are ignoring the suggestions currently, because they are
// only 50% accurate (even if the second suggestion is unavailable),
// which may confuse the user.
// Think how to perform more accurate suggestions?
// The second clone can have a suggestion and if there is one, we report
// that suggestion to the user.
if (Pair.SecondCloneInfo.Suggestion) {
DiagEngine.Report(Pair.SecondCloneInfo.VarRange.getBegin(),
RelatedSuspiciousCloneNote)
<< Pair.SecondCloneInfo.VarRange << Pair.SecondCloneInfo.Suggestion;
continue;
}
auto R = llvm::make_unique<BugReport>(
*BT_Suspicious,
"Potential copy-paste error; did you really mean to use '" +
Pair.FirstCloneInfo.Variable->getNameAsString() + "' here?",
PathDiagnosticLocation::createBegin(Pair.FirstCloneInfo.Mention, SM,
ADC));
R->addRange(Pair.FirstCloneInfo.Mention->getSourceRange());
// If there isn't a suggestion in the second clone, we only inform the
// user where we got the idea that his code could contain an error.
DiagEngine.Report(Pair.SecondCloneInfo.VarRange.getBegin(),
RelatedCloneNote)
<< Pair.SecondCloneInfo.VarRange;
R->addNote("Similar code using '" +
Pair.SecondCloneInfo.Variable->getNameAsString() + "' here",
PathDiagnosticLocation::createBegin(Pair.SecondCloneInfo.Mention,
SM, ADC),
Pair.SecondCloneInfo.Mention->getSourceRange());
BR.emitReport(std::move(R));
}
}

View File

@ -4,14 +4,14 @@
void log();
auto BlockA = ^(int a, int b){ // expected-warning{{Detected code clone.}}
auto BlockA = ^(int a, int b){ // expected-warning{{Duplicate code detected}}
log();
if (a > b)
return a;
return b;
};
auto BlockB = ^(int a, int b){ // expected-note{{Related code clone is here.}}
auto BlockB = ^(int a, int b){ // expected-note{{Similar code here}}
log();
if (a > b)
return a;

View File

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
// Tests if function try blocks are correctly handled.
void nonCompoundStmt1(int& x)
try { x += 1; } catch(...) { x -= 1; } // expected-warning{{Detected code clone.}}
try { x += 1; } catch(...) { x -= 1; } // expected-warning{{Duplicate code detected}}
void nonCompoundStmt2(int& x)
try { x += 1; } catch(...) { x -= 1; } // expected-note{{Related code clone is here.}}
try { x += 1; } catch(...) { x -= 1; } // expected-note{{Similar code here}}

View File

@ -4,14 +4,14 @@
void log();
int max(int a, int b) { // expected-warning{{Detected code clone.}}
int max(int a, int b) { // expected-warning{{Duplicate code detected}}
log();
if (a > b)
return a;
return b;
}
int maxClone(int x, int y) { // expected-note{{Related code clone is here.}}
int maxClone(int x, int y) { // expected-note{{Similar code here}}
log();
if (x > y)
return x;

View File

@ -11,11 +11,11 @@
// This confirms that with the current configuration the macro body would be
// considered large enough to pass the MinimumCloneComplexity constraint.
int manualMacro(int a, int b) { // expected-warning{{Detected code clone.}}
int manualMacro(int a, int b) { // expected-warning{{Duplicate code detected}}
return a > b ? -a * a : -b * b;
}
int manualMacroClone(int a, int b) { // expected-note{{Related code clone is here.}}
int manualMacroClone(int a, int b) { // expected-note{{Similar code here}}
return a > b ? -a * a : -b * b;
}
@ -41,10 +41,10 @@ int macroClone(int a, int b) {
#define NEG(A) -(A)
int nestedMacros() { // expected-warning{{Detected code clone.}}
int nestedMacros() { // expected-warning{{Duplicate code detected}}
return NEG(NEG(NEG(NEG(NEG(NEG(NEG(NEG(NEG(NEG(1))))))))));
}
int nestedMacrosClone() { // expected-note{{Related code clone is here.}}
int nestedMacrosClone() { // expected-note{{Similar code here}}
return NEG(NEG(NEG(NEG(NEG(NEG(NEG(NEG(NEG(NEG(1))))))))));
}

View File

@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
// to have the same complexity value. Macros have smaller complexity values
// and need to be in their own hash group.
int foo(int a) { // expected-warning{{Detected code clone.}}
int foo(int a) { // expected-warning{{Duplicate code detected}}
a = a + 1;
a = a + 1 / 1;
a = a + 1 + 1 + 1;
@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ int foo(int a) { // expected-warning{{Detected code clone.}}
return a;
}
int fooClone(int a) { // expected-note{{Related code clone is here.}}
int fooClone(int a) { // expected-note{{Similar code here}}
a = a + 1;
a = a + 1 / 1;
a = a + 1 + 1 + 1;
@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ int fooClone(int a) { // expected-note{{Related code clone is here.}}
#define ASSIGN(T, V) T = T + V
int macro(int a) { // expected-warning{{Detected code clone.}}
int macro(int a) { // expected-warning{{Duplicate code detected}}
ASSIGN(a, 1);
ASSIGN(a, 1 / 1);
ASSIGN(a, 1 + 1 + 1);
@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ int macro(int a) { // expected-warning{{Detected code clone.}}
return a;
}
int macroClone(int a) { // expected-note{{Related code clone is here.}}
int macroClone(int a) { // expected-note{{Similar code here}}
ASSIGN(a, 1);
ASSIGN(a, 1 / 1);
ASSIGN(a, 1 + 1 + 1);
@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ int macroClone(int a) { // expected-note{{Related code clone is here.}}
#define EMPTY
int fooFalsePositiveClone(int a) { // expected-note{{Related code clone is here.}}
int fooFalsePositiveClone(int a) { // expected-note{{Similar code here}}
a = EMPTY a + 1;
a = a + 1 / 1;
a = a + 1 + 1 + 1;

View File

@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
@end
@implementation A
- (int) setOk : (int) a : (int) b { // expected-warning{{Detected code clone.}}
- (int) setOk : (int) a : (int) b { // expected-warning{{Duplicate code detected}}
if (a > b)
return a;
return b;
@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
@end
@implementation B
- (int) setOk : (int) a : (int) b { // expected-note{{Related code clone is here.}}
- (int) setOk : (int) a : (int) b { // expected-note{{Similar code here}}
if (a > b)
return a;
return b;

View File

@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -analyze -analyzer-output=plist -analyzer-config notes-as-events=true -o %t.plist -std=c++11 -analyzer-checker=alpha.clone.CloneChecker -verify %s
// RUN: FileCheck --input-file=%t.plist %s
void log();
int max(int a, int b) { // expected-warning{{Duplicate code detected}}
log();
if (a > b)
return a;
return b;
}
int maxClone(int a, int b) { // no-note (converted into event)
log();
if (a > b)
return a;
return b;
}
// CHECK: <key>diagnostics</key>
// CHECK-NEXT: <array>
// CHECK-NEXT: <dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>path</key>
// CHECK-NEXT: <array>
// CHECK-NEXT: <dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>kind</key><string>event</string>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>location</key>
// CHECK-NEXT: <dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>line</key><integer>13</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>col</key><integer>28</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>file</key><integer>0</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: </dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>ranges</key>
// CHECK-NEXT: <array>
// CHECK-NEXT: <array>
// CHECK-NEXT: <dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>line</key><integer>13</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>col</key><integer>28</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>file</key><integer>0</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: </dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: <dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>line</key><integer>18</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>col</key><integer>1</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>file</key><integer>0</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: </dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: </array>
// CHECK-NEXT: </array>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>depth</key><integer>0</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>extended_message</key>
// CHECK-NEXT: <string>Similar code here</string>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>message</key>
// CHECK-NEXT: <string>Similar code here</string>
// CHECK-NEXT: </dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: <dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>kind</key><string>event</string>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>location</key>
// CHECK-NEXT: <dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>line</key><integer>6</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>col</key><integer>23</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>file</key><integer>0</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: </dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>ranges</key>
// CHECK-NEXT: <array>
// CHECK-NEXT: <array>
// CHECK-NEXT: <dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>line</key><integer>6</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>col</key><integer>23</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>file</key><integer>0</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: </dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: <dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>line</key><integer>11</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>col</key><integer>1</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>file</key><integer>0</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: </dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: </array>
// CHECK-NEXT: </array>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>depth</key><integer>0</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>extended_message</key>
// CHECK-NEXT: <string>Duplicate code detected</string>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>message</key>
// CHECK-NEXT: <string>Duplicate code detected</string>
// CHECK-NEXT: </dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: </array>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>description</key><string>Duplicate code detected</string>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>category</key><string>Code clone</string>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>type</key><string>Exact code clone</string>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>check_name</key><string>alpha.clone.CloneChecker</string>
// CHECK-NEXT: <!-- This hash is experimental and going to change! -->
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>issue_hash_content_of_line_in_context</key><string>3d15184f38c5fa57e479b744fe3f5035</string>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>location</key>
// CHECK-NEXT: <dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>line</key><integer>6</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>col</key><integer>23</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>file</key><integer>0</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: </dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: </dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: </array>

View File

@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -analyze -analyzer-output=plist -o %t.plist -std=c++11 -analyzer-checker=alpha.clone.CloneChecker -verify %s
// RUN: FileCheck --input-file=%t.plist %s
void log();
int max(int a, int b) { // expected-warning{{Duplicate code detected}}
log();
if (a > b)
return a;
return b;
}
int maxClone(int a, int b) { // expected-note{{Similar code here}}
log();
if (a > b)
return a;
return b;
}
// FIXME: This plist output doesn't include the extra note on line 13.
// It should be updated once the format for extra notes in plists is defined.
// CHECK: <key>diagnostics</key>
// CHECK-NEXT: <array>
// CHECK-NEXT: <dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>path</key>
// CHECK-NEXT: <array>
// CHECK-NEXT: <dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>kind</key><string>event</string>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>location</key>
// CHECK-NEXT: <dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>line</key><integer>6</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>col</key><integer>23</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>file</key><integer>0</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: </dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>ranges</key>
// CHECK-NEXT: <array>
// CHECK-NEXT: <array>
// CHECK-NEXT: <dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>line</key><integer>6</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>col</key><integer>23</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>file</key><integer>0</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: </dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: <dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>line</key><integer>11</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>col</key><integer>1</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>file</key><integer>0</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: </dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: </array>
// CHECK-NEXT: </array>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>depth</key><integer>0</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>extended_message</key>
// CHECK-NEXT: <string>Duplicate code detected</string>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>message</key>
// CHECK-NEXT: <string>Duplicate code detected</string>
// CHECK-NEXT: </dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: </array>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>description</key><string>Duplicate code detected</string>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>category</key><string>Code clone</string>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>type</key><string>Exact code clone</string>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>check_name</key><string>alpha.clone.CloneChecker</string>
// CHECK-NEXT: <!-- This hash is experimental and going to change! -->
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>issue_hash_content_of_line_in_context</key><string>3d15184f38c5fa57e479b744fe3f5035</string>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>location</key>
// CHECK-NEXT: <dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>line</key><integer>6</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>col</key><integer>23</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: <key>file</key><integer>0</integer>
// CHECK-NEXT: </dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: </dict>
// CHECK-NEXT: </array>

View File

@ -7,14 +7,14 @@ void log();
int max(int a, int b) {
log2(a);
log(); // expected-warning{{Detected code clone.}}
log(); // expected-warning{{Duplicate code detected}}
if (a > b)
return a;
return b;
}
int maxClone(int a, int b) {
log(); // expected-note{{Related code clone is here.}}
log(); // expected-note{{Similar code here}}
if (a > b)
return a;
return b;

View File

@ -8,14 +8,14 @@ int max(int a, int b) {
log();
if (a > b)
return a;
return b; // expected-note{{suggestion is based on the usage of this variable in a similar piece of code}}
return b; // expected-note{{Similar code using 'b' here}}
}
int maxClone(int x, int y, int z) {
log();
if (x > y)
return x;
return z; // expected-warning{{suspicious code clone detected; did you mean to use 'y'?}}
return z; // expected-warning{{Potential copy-paste error; did you really mean to use 'z' here?}}
}
// Tests finding a suspicious clone that references global variables.
@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ void busyIncrement() {
while (true) {
if (m1.try_lock()) {
++i;
m1.unlock(); // expected-note{{suggestion is based on the usage of this variable in a similar piece of code}}
m1.unlock(); // expected-note{{Similar code using 'm1' here}}
if (i > 1000) {
return;
}
@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ void faultyBusyIncrement() {
while (true) {
if (m1.try_lock()) {
++i;
m2.unlock(); // expected-warning{{suspicious code clone detected; did you mean to use 'm1'?}}
m2.unlock(); // expected-warning{{Potential copy-paste error; did you really mean to use 'm2' here?}}
if (i > 1000) {
return;
}
@ -58,14 +58,14 @@ void faultyBusyIncrement() {
int foo(int a, int b, int c) {
a += b + c;
b /= a + b;
c -= b * a; // expected-warning{{suspicious code clone detected; did you mean to use 'a'?}}
c -= b * a; // expected-warning{{Potential copy-paste error; did you really mean to use 'b' here?}}
return c;
}
int fooClone(int a, int b, int c) {
a += b + c;
b /= a + b;
c -= a * a; // expected-note{{suggestion is based on the usage of this variable in a similar piece of code; did you mean to use 'b'?}}
c -= a * a; // expected-note{{Similar code using 'a' here}}
return c;
}
@ -77,21 +77,21 @@ int fooClone(int a, int b, int c) {
long bar1(long a, long b, long c, long d) {
c = a - b;
c = c / d * a;
d = b * b - c; // expected-warning{{suspicious code clone detected; did you mean to use 'c'?}}
d = b * b - c; // expected-warning{{Potential copy-paste error; did you really mean to use 'b' here?}}
return d;
}
long bar2(long a, long b, long c, long d) {
c = a - b;
c = c / d * a;
d = c * b - c; // expected-note{{suggestion is based on the usage of this variable in a similar piece of code; did you mean to use 'b'?}} \
// expected-warning{{suspicious code clone detected; did you mean to use 'a'?}}
d = c * b - c; // expected-note{{Similar code using 'c' here}} \
// expected-warning{{Potential copy-paste error; did you really mean to use 'c' here?}}
return d;
}
long bar3(long a, long b, long c, long d) {
c = a - b;
c = c / d * a;
d = a * b - c; // expected-note{{suggestion is based on the usage of this variable in a similar piece of code; did you mean to use 'c'?}}
d = a * b - c; // expected-note{{Similar code using 'a' here}}
return d;
}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -analyze -analyzer-output=text -std=c++11 -analyzer-checker=alpha.clone.CloneChecker -verify %s
void log();
int max(int a, int b) { // expected-warning{{Duplicate code detected}} // expected-note{{Duplicate code detected}}
log();
if (a > b)
return a;
return b;
}
int maxClone(int a, int b) { // expected-note{{Similar code here}}
log();
if (a > b)
return a;
return b;
}