[LoopInterchange] Incrementally update the dominator tree.

We can use incremental dominator tree updates to avoid re-calculating
the dominator tree after interchanging 2 loops.

Reviewers: dmgreen, kuhar

Reviewed By: kuhar

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43176

llvm-svn: 325122

llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopInterchange.cpp

@@ -453,6 +453,8 @@ struct LoopInterchange : public FunctionPass {
     AU.addRequiredID(LoopSimplifyID);
     AU.addRequiredID(LCSSAID);
     AU.addRequired<OptimizationRemarkEmitterWrapperPass>();
+
+    AU.addPreserved<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
   }
 
   bool runOnFunction(Function &F) override {
@@ -462,8 +464,7 @@ struct LoopInterchange : public FunctionPass {
     SE = &getAnalysis<ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass>().getSE();
     LI = &getAnalysis<LoopInfoWrapperPass>().getLoopInfo();
     DI = &getAnalysis<DependenceAnalysisWrapperPass>().getDI();
-    auto *DTWP = getAnalysisIfAvailable<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
-    DT = DTWP ? &DTWP->getDomTree() : nullptr;
+    DT = &getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree();
     ORE = &getAnalysis<OptimizationRemarkEmitterWrapperPass>().getORE();
     PreserveLCSSA = mustPreserveAnalysisID(LCSSAID);
 
@@ -573,7 +574,6 @@ struct LoopInterchange : public FunctionPass {
 
       // Update the DependencyMatrix
       interChangeDependencies(DependencyMatrix, i, i - 1);
-      DT->recalculate(F);
 #ifdef DUMP_DEP_MATRICIES
       DEBUG(dbgs() << "Dependence after interchange\n");
       printDepMatrix(DependencyMatrix);
@@ -1265,8 +1265,31 @@ void LoopInterchangeTransform::updateIncomingBlock(BasicBlock *CurrBlock,
   }
 }
 
+/// \brief Update BI to jump to NewBB instead of OldBB. Records updates to
+/// the dominator tree in DTUpdates, if DT should be preserved.
+static void updateSuccessor(BranchInst *BI, BasicBlock *OldBB,
+                            BasicBlock *NewBB,
+                            std::vector<DominatorTree::UpdateType> &DTUpdates) {
+  assert(llvm::count_if(BI->successors(),
+                        [OldBB](BasicBlock *BB) { return BB == OldBB; }) < 2 &&
+         "BI must jump to OldBB at most once.");
+  for (unsigned i = 0, e = BI->getNumSuccessors(); i < e; ++i) {
+    if (BI->getSuccessor(i) == OldBB) {
+      BI->setSuccessor(i, NewBB);
+
+      DTUpdates.push_back(
+          {DominatorTree::UpdateKind::Insert, BI->getParent(), NewBB});
+      DTUpdates.push_back(
+          {DominatorTree::UpdateKind::Delete, BI->getParent(), OldBB});
+      break;
+    }
+  }
+}
+
 bool LoopInterchangeTransform::adjustLoopBranches() {
   DEBUG(dbgs() << "adjustLoopBranches called\n");
+  std::vector<DominatorTree::UpdateType> DTUpdates;
+
   // Adjust the loop preheader
   BasicBlock *InnerLoopHeader = InnerLoop->getHeader();
   BasicBlock *OuterLoopHeader = OuterLoop->getHeader();
@@ -1306,27 +1329,18 @@ bool LoopInterchangeTransform::adjustLoopBranches() {
     return false;
 
   // Adjust Loop Preheader and headers
-
-  unsigned NumSucc = OuterLoopPredecessorBI->getNumSuccessors();
-  for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumSucc; ++i) {
-    if (OuterLoopPredecessorBI->getSuccessor(i) == OuterLoopPreHeader)
-      OuterLoopPredecessorBI->setSuccessor(i, InnerLoopPreHeader);
-  }
-
-  NumSucc = OuterLoopHeaderBI->getNumSuccessors();
-  for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumSucc; ++i) {
-    if (OuterLoopHeaderBI->getSuccessor(i) == OuterLoopLatch)
-      OuterLoopHeaderBI->setSuccessor(i, LoopExit);
-    else if (OuterLoopHeaderBI->getSuccessor(i) == InnerLoopPreHeader)
-      OuterLoopHeaderBI->setSuccessor(i, InnerLoopHeaderSuccessor);
-  }
+  updateSuccessor(OuterLoopPredecessorBI, OuterLoopPreHeader,
+                  InnerLoopPreHeader, DTUpdates);
+  updateSuccessor(OuterLoopHeaderBI, OuterLoopLatch, LoopExit, DTUpdates);
+  updateSuccessor(OuterLoopHeaderBI, InnerLoopPreHeader,
+                  InnerLoopHeaderSuccessor, DTUpdates);
 
   // Adjust reduction PHI's now that the incoming block has changed.
   updateIncomingBlock(InnerLoopHeaderSuccessor, InnerLoopHeader,
                       OuterLoopHeader);
 
-  BranchInst::Create(OuterLoopPreHeader, InnerLoopHeaderBI);
-  InnerLoopHeaderBI->eraseFromParent();
+  updateSuccessor(InnerLoopHeaderBI, InnerLoopHeaderSuccessor,
+                  OuterLoopPreHeader, DTUpdates);
 
   // -------------Adjust loop latches-----------
   if (InnerLoopLatchBI->getSuccessor(0) == InnerLoopHeader)
@@ -1334,11 +1348,8 @@ bool LoopInterchangeTransform::adjustLoopBranches() {
   else
     InnerLoopLatchSuccessor = InnerLoopLatchBI->getSuccessor(0);
 
-  NumSucc = InnerLoopLatchPredecessorBI->getNumSuccessors();
-  for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumSucc; ++i) {
-    if (InnerLoopLatchPredecessorBI->getSuccessor(i) == InnerLoopLatch)
-      InnerLoopLatchPredecessorBI->setSuccessor(i, InnerLoopLatchSuccessor);
-  }
+  updateSuccessor(InnerLoopLatchPredecessorBI, InnerLoopLatch,
+                  InnerLoopLatchSuccessor, DTUpdates);
 
   // Adjust PHI nodes in InnerLoopLatchSuccessor. Update all uses of PHI with
   // the value and remove this PHI node from inner loop.
@@ -1358,19 +1369,14 @@ bool LoopInterchangeTransform::adjustLoopBranches() {
   else
     OuterLoopLatchSuccessor = OuterLoopLatchBI->getSuccessor(0);
 
-  if (InnerLoopLatchBI->getSuccessor(1) == InnerLoopLatchSuccessor)
-    InnerLoopLatchBI->setSuccessor(1, OuterLoopLatchSuccessor);
-  else
-    InnerLoopLatchBI->setSuccessor(0, OuterLoopLatchSuccessor);
+  updateSuccessor(InnerLoopLatchBI, InnerLoopLatchSuccessor,
+                  OuterLoopLatchSuccessor, DTUpdates);
+  updateSuccessor(OuterLoopLatchBI, OuterLoopLatchSuccessor, InnerLoopLatch,
+                  DTUpdates);
 
   updateIncomingBlock(OuterLoopLatchSuccessor, OuterLoopLatch, InnerLoopLatch);
 
-  if (OuterLoopLatchBI->getSuccessor(0) == OuterLoopLatchSuccessor) {
-    OuterLoopLatchBI->setSuccessor(0, InnerLoopLatch);
-  } else {
-    OuterLoopLatchBI->setSuccessor(1, InnerLoopLatch);
-  }
-
+  DT->applyUpdates(DTUpdates);
   return true;
 }
 

llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/call-instructions.ll

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -verify-dom-info -S | FileCheck %s
 ;; We test the complete .ll for adjustment in outer loop header/latch and inner loop header/latch.
 
 target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"

llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/currentLimitation.ll

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -verify-dom-info -S | FileCheck %s
 ;; These are test that fail to interchange due to current limitation. This will go off once we extend the loop interchange pass.
 
 target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"

llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/interchange-flow-dep-outer.ll

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -verify-dom-info -S | FileCheck %s
 ;; We test the complete .ll for adjustment in outer loop header/latch and inner loop header/latch.
 
 target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"

llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/interchange-insts-between-indvar.ll

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -verify-dom-info -S | FileCheck %s
 
 @A10 = local_unnamed_addr global [3 x [3 x i32]] zeroinitializer, align 16
 

llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/interchange-output-dependencies.ll

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -verify-dom-info -S | FileCheck %s
 ;; We test the complete .ll for adjustment in outer loop header/latch and inner loop header/latch.
 
 target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"

llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/interchange-simple-count-down.ll

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -verify-dom-info -S | FileCheck %s
 ;; We test the complete .ll for adjustment in outer loop header/latch and inner loop header/latch.
 
 target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"

llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/interchange-simple-count-up.ll

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -verify-dom-info -S | FileCheck %s
 ;; We test the complete .ll for adjustment in outer loop header/latch and inner loop header/latch.
 
 target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"

llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/not-interchanged-dependencies-1.ll

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -verify-dom-info -S | FileCheck %s
 ;; We test the complete .ll for adjustment in outer loop header/latch and inner loop header/latch.
 
 target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"

llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/phi-ordering.ll

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-; RUN: opt < %s -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt < %s -loop-interchange -verify-dom-info -S | FileCheck %s
 ;; Checks the order of the inner phi nodes does not cause havoc.
 ;; The inner loop has a reduction into c. The IV is not the first phi.
 

llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/profitability.ll

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -verify-dom-info -S | FileCheck %s
 ;; We test profitability model in these test cases.
 
 target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"

llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/reductions.ll

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -verify-dom-info -S | FileCheck %s
 
 @A = common global [500 x [500 x i32]] zeroinitializer
 @X = common global i32 0