[SLP] Don't pass a global CL option as an argument. NFC.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24199

llvm-svn: 280527
This commit is contained in:
Chad Rosier 2016-09-02 19:09:50 +00:00
parent 00864886f4
commit c50dfe38ac
2 changed files with 10 additions and 12 deletions

View File

@ -96,11 +96,10 @@ private:
/// a vectorization chain.
bool vectorizeChainsInBlock(BasicBlock *BB, slpvectorizer::BoUpSLP &R);
bool vectorizeStoreChain(ArrayRef<Value *> Chain, int CostThreshold,
slpvectorizer::BoUpSLP &R, unsigned VecRegSize);
bool vectorizeStoreChain(ArrayRef<Value *> Chain, slpvectorizer::BoUpSLP &R,
unsigned VecRegSize);
bool vectorizeStores(ArrayRef<StoreInst *> Stores, int costThreshold,
slpvectorizer::BoUpSLP &R);
bool vectorizeStores(ArrayRef<StoreInst *> Stores, slpvectorizer::BoUpSLP &R);
/// The store instructions in a basic block organized by base pointer.
StoreListMap Stores;

View File

@ -3685,8 +3685,7 @@ static bool hasValueBeenRAUWed(ArrayRef<Value *> VL, ArrayRef<WeakVH> VH,
return !std::equal(VL.begin(), VL.end(), VH.begin());
}
bool SLPVectorizerPass::vectorizeStoreChain(ArrayRef<Value *> Chain,
int CostThreshold, BoUpSLP &R,
bool SLPVectorizerPass::vectorizeStoreChain(ArrayRef<Value *> Chain, BoUpSLP &R,
unsigned VecRegSize) {
unsigned ChainLen = Chain.size();
DEBUG(dbgs() << "SLP: Analyzing a store chain of length " << ChainLen
@ -3723,7 +3722,7 @@ bool SLPVectorizerPass::vectorizeStoreChain(ArrayRef<Value *> Chain,
int Cost = R.getTreeCost();
DEBUG(dbgs() << "SLP: Found cost=" << Cost << " for VF=" << VF << "\n");
if (Cost < CostThreshold) {
if (Cost < -SLPCostThreshold) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "SLP: Decided to vectorize cost=" << Cost << "\n");
R.vectorizeTree();
@ -3737,7 +3736,7 @@ bool SLPVectorizerPass::vectorizeStoreChain(ArrayRef<Value *> Chain,
}
bool SLPVectorizerPass::vectorizeStores(ArrayRef<StoreInst *> Stores,
int costThreshold, BoUpSLP &R) {
BoUpSLP &R) {
SetVector<StoreInst *> Heads, Tails;
SmallDenseMap<StoreInst *, StoreInst *> ConsecutiveChain;
@ -3792,8 +3791,9 @@ bool SLPVectorizerPass::vectorizeStores(ArrayRef<StoreInst *> Stores,
// FIXME: Is division-by-2 the correct step? Should we assert that the
// register size is a power-of-2?
for (unsigned Size = R.getMaxVecRegSize(); Size >= R.getMinVecRegSize(); Size /= 2) {
if (vectorizeStoreChain(Operands, costThreshold, R, Size)) {
for (unsigned Size = R.getMaxVecRegSize(); Size >= R.getMinVecRegSize();
Size /= 2) {
if (vectorizeStoreChain(Operands, R, Size)) {
// Mark the vectorized stores so that we don't vectorize them again.
VectorizedStores.insert(Operands.begin(), Operands.end());
Changed = true;
@ -4751,8 +4751,7 @@ bool SLPVectorizerPass::vectorizeStoreChains(BoUpSLP &R) {
// may cause a significant compile-time increase.
for (unsigned CI = 0, CE = it->second.size(); CI < CE; CI+=16) {
unsigned Len = std::min<unsigned>(CE - CI, 16);
Changed |= vectorizeStores(makeArrayRef(&it->second[CI], Len),
-SLPCostThreshold, R);
Changed |= vectorizeStores(makeArrayRef(&it->second[CI], Len), R);
}
}
return Changed;