forked from OSchip/llvm-project
MS ABI: Up the required alignment after inserting padding between vbases
We would correctly insert sufficiently aligned padding between vbases when our leading base was empty, however we would neglect to increase the required alignment of the most derived class. This fixes PR20315. llvm-svn: 213123
This commit is contained in:
parent
1272764b18
commit
bf3d430163
|
@ -2613,8 +2613,10 @@ void MicrosoftRecordLayoutBuilder::layoutVirtualBases(const CXXRecordDecl *RD) {
|
|||
// bytes (in both 32 and 64 bits modes) and always involves rounding up to
|
||||
// the required alignment, we don't know why.
|
||||
if ((PreviousBaseLayout && PreviousBaseLayout->hasZeroSizedSubObject() &&
|
||||
BaseLayout.leadsWithZeroSizedBase()) || HasVtordisp)
|
||||
BaseLayout.leadsWithZeroSizedBase()) || HasVtordisp) {
|
||||
Size = Size.RoundUpToAlignment(VtorDispAlignment) + VtorDispSize;
|
||||
RequiredAlignment = VtorDispAlignment;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Insert the virtual base.
|
||||
ElementInfo Info = getAdjustedElementInfo(BaseLayout);
|
||||
CharUnits BaseOffset = Size.RoundUpToAlignment(Info.Alignment);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -544,6 +544,60 @@ struct RE {
|
|||
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=1029, align=1
|
||||
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=1029, nvalign=1]
|
||||
|
||||
struct NA {};
|
||||
struct NB {};
|
||||
#pragma pack(push, 1)
|
||||
struct NC : virtual NA, virtual NB {};
|
||||
#pragma pack(pop)
|
||||
struct ND : NC {};
|
||||
|
||||
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct NA (empty)
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=1, align=1
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=0, nvalign=1]
|
||||
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct NB (empty)
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=1, align=1
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=0, nvalign=1]
|
||||
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct NC
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | (NC vbtable pointer)
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: 4 | struct NA (virtual base) (empty)
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: 8 | struct NB (virtual base) (empty)
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=8, align=1
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=4, nvalign=1]
|
||||
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct ND
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct NC (base)
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | (NC vbtable pointer)
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: 4 | struct NA (virtual base) (empty)
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: 8 | struct NB (virtual base) (empty)
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=8, align=4
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=4, nvalign=4]
|
||||
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
|
||||
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct NA (empty)
|
||||
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=1, align=1
|
||||
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=0, nvalign=1]
|
||||
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
|
||||
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct NB (empty)
|
||||
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=1, align=1
|
||||
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=0, nvalign=1]
|
||||
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
|
||||
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct NC
|
||||
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | (NC vbtable pointer)
|
||||
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 8 | struct NA (virtual base) (empty)
|
||||
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 12 | struct NB (virtual base) (empty)
|
||||
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=12, align=1
|
||||
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=8, nvalign=1]
|
||||
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
|
||||
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct ND
|
||||
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct NC (base)
|
||||
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | (NC vbtable pointer)
|
||||
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 8 | struct NA (virtual base) (empty)
|
||||
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 12 | struct NB (virtual base) (empty)
|
||||
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=12, align=4
|
||||
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=8, nvalign=4]
|
||||
|
||||
int a[
|
||||
sizeof(X)+
|
||||
sizeof(Y)+
|
||||
|
@ -568,4 +622,5 @@ sizeof(RB2)+
|
|||
sizeof(RB3)+
|
||||
sizeof(RC)+
|
||||
sizeof(RE)+
|
||||
sizeof(ND)+
|
||||
0];
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue