forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[Clang] define __cpp_named_character_escapes
Define the feature test macro for named character escapes. I assume this was not done because it was implemented before formally accepted, right? cxx_status says the paper is implemented. Reviewed By: cor3ntin Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134898
This commit is contained in:
parent
9706bb3165
commit
bd1bb8cd42
|
@ -697,10 +697,11 @@ static void InitializeCPlusPlusFeatureTestMacros(const LangOptions &LangOpts,
|
|||
Builder.defineMacro("__cpp_multidimensional_subscript", "202110L");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// We provide this as an extension in earlier language modes, so we
|
||||
// also define the macro.
|
||||
// We provide those C++2b features as extensions in earlier language modes, so
|
||||
// we also define their feature test macros.
|
||||
if (LangOpts.CPlusPlus11)
|
||||
Builder.defineMacro("__cpp_static_call_operator", "202207L");
|
||||
Builder.defineMacro("__cpp_named_character_escapes", "202207L");
|
||||
|
||||
if (LangOpts.Char8)
|
||||
Builder.defineMacro("__cpp_char8_t", "201811L");
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
|
|||
#error "wrong value for __cpp_static_call_operator"
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if check(named_character_escapes, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
|
||||
#if check(named_character_escapes, 202207, 202207, 202207, 202207, 202207, 202207)
|
||||
#error "wrong value for __cpp_named_character_escapes"
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue