[AST][RecoveryExpr] Build dependent callexpr in C for error-recovery.

See whole context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85025

Reviewed By: sammccall

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84304

clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp

@@ -6375,6 +6375,21 @@ ExprResult Sema::BuildCallExpr(Scope *Scope, Expr *Fn, SourceLocation LParenLoc,
     checkDirectCallValidity(*this, Fn, FD, ArgExprs);
   }
 
+  if (Context.isDependenceAllowed() &&
+      (Fn->isTypeDependent() || Expr::hasAnyTypeDependentArguments(ArgExprs))) {
+    assert(!getLangOpts().CPlusPlus);
+    assert(Fn->containsErrors() ||
+           llvm::any_of(ArgExprs,
+                        [](clang::Expr *E) { return E->containsErrors(); }) &&
+               "should only occur in error-recovery path.");
+    QualType ReturnType =
+        llvm::isa_and_nonnull<FunctionDecl>(NDecl)
+            ? dyn_cast<FunctionDecl>(NDecl)->getCallResultType()
+            : Context.DependentTy;
+    return CallExpr::Create(Context, Fn, ArgExprs, ReturnType,
+                            Expr::getValueKindForType(ReturnType), RParenLoc,
+                            CurFPFeatureOverrides());
+  }
   return BuildResolvedCallExpr(Fn, NDecl, LParenLoc, ArgExprs, RParenLoc,
                                ExecConfig, IsExecConfig);
 }
@@ -6515,7 +6530,7 @@ ExprResult Sema::BuildResolvedCallExpr(Expr *Fn, NamedDecl *NDecl,
                          CurFPFeatureOverrides(), NumParams, UsesADL);
   }
 
-  if (!getLangOpts().CPlusPlus) {
+  if (!Context.isDependenceAllowed()) {
     // Forget about the nulled arguments since typo correction
     // do not handle them well.
     TheCall->shrinkNumArgs(Args.size());
@@ -19052,7 +19067,7 @@ static ExprResult diagnoseUnknownAnyExpr(Sema &S, Expr *E) {
 /// Check for operands with placeholder types and complain if found.
 /// Returns ExprError() if there was an error and no recovery was possible.
 ExprResult Sema::CheckPlaceholderExpr(Expr *E) {
-  if (!getLangOpts().CPlusPlus) {
+  if (!Context.isDependenceAllowed()) {
     // C cannot handle TypoExpr nodes on either side of a binop because it
     // doesn't handle dependent types properly, so make sure any TypoExprs have
     // been dealt with before checking the operands.

clang/test/AST/ast-dump-recovery.c

@@ -87,3 +87,18 @@ void test2() {
   // CHECK-NEXT:   `-DeclRefExpr {{.*}} 'some_func'
   (float)some_func();
 }
+
+void test3() {
+  // CHECK:     CallExpr {{.*}} '<dependent type>' contains-errors
+  // CHECK-NEXT: |-ParenExpr {{.*}} contains-errors lvalue
+  // CHECK-NEXT: | `-RecoveryExpr {{.*}} contains-errors
+  // CHECK-NEXT: |   `-DeclRefExpr {{.*}} '__builtin_classify_type'
+  // CHECK-NEXT: `-IntegerLiteral {{.*}} 'int' 1
+  (*__builtin_classify_type)(1);
+
+  extern void ext();
+  // CHECK:     CallExpr {{.*}} 'void' contains-errors
+  // CHECK-NEXT: |-DeclRefExpr {{.*}} 'ext'
+  // CHECK-NEXT: `-RecoveryExpr {{.*}} '<dependent type>'
+  ext(undef_var);
+}

clang/test/Sema/error-dependence.c

@@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ void test1(int s) {
   // verify diagnostic "operand of type '<dependent type>' where arithmetic or
   // pointer type is required" is not emitted.
   (float)call(); // expected-error {{too few arguments to function call}}
+  // verify disgnostic "called object type '<dependent type>' is not a function
+  // or function pointer" is not emitted.
+  (*__builtin_classify_type)(1); // expected-error {{builtin functions must be directly called}}
 }
 
 void test2(int* ptr, float f) {