Revert "[InstCombine] Simplify boolean Phis with const inputs using CFG"

This reverts commit 00472067c3.

Need to fix failing clang tests.
This commit is contained in:
Max Kazantsev 2020-07-16 12:58:39 +07:00
parent fc55308628
commit b893822e32
8 changed files with 46 additions and 106 deletions

View File

@ -1129,75 +1129,6 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::SliceUpIllegalIntegerPHI(PHINode &FirstPhi) {
return replaceInstUsesWith(FirstPhi, Undef);
}
static Value *SimplifyUsingControlFlow(InstCombiner &Self, PHINode &PN,
const DominatorTree &DT) {
// Simplify the following patterns:
// if (cond)
// / \
// ... ...
// \ /
// phi [true] [false]
if (!PN.getType()->isIntegerTy(1))
return nullptr;
if (PN.getNumOperands() != 2)
return nullptr;
// Make sure all inputs are constants.
if (!all_of(PN.operands(), [](Value *V) { return isa<ConstantInt>(V); }))
return nullptr;
BasicBlock *BB = PN.getParent();
// Do not bother with unreachable instructions.
if (!DT.isReachableFromEntry(BB))
return nullptr;
// Same inputs.
if (PN.getOperand(0) == PN.getOperand(1))
return PN.getOperand(0);
BasicBlock *TruePred = nullptr, *FalsePred = nullptr;
for (auto *Pred : predecessors(BB)) {
auto *Input = cast<ConstantInt>(PN.getIncomingValueForBlock(Pred));
if (Input->isAllOnesValue())
TruePred = Pred;
else
FalsePred = Pred;
}
assert(TruePred && FalsePred && "Must be!");
// Check which edge of the dominator dominates the true input. If it is the
// false edge, we should invert the condition.
auto *IDom = DT.getNode(BB)->getIDom()->getBlock();
auto *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(IDom->getTerminator());
if (!BI || BI->isUnconditional())
return nullptr;
// Check that edges outgoing from the idom's terminators dominate respective
// inputs of the Phi.
BasicBlockEdge TrueOutEdge(IDom, BI->getSuccessor(0));
BasicBlockEdge FalseOutEdge(IDom, BI->getSuccessor(1));
BasicBlockEdge TrueIncEdge(TruePred, BB);
BasicBlockEdge FalseIncEdge(FalsePred, BB);
auto *Cond = BI->getCondition();
if (DT.dominates(TrueOutEdge, TrueIncEdge) &&
DT.dominates(FalseOutEdge, FalseIncEdge))
// This Phi is actually equivalent to branching condition of IDom.
return Cond;
else if (DT.dominates(TrueOutEdge, FalseIncEdge) &&
DT.dominates(FalseOutEdge, TrueIncEdge)) {
// This Phi is actually opposite to branching condition of IDom. We invert
// the condition that will potentially open up some opportunities for
// sinking.
Self.Builder.SetInsertPoint(BB->getFirstNonPHI());
return Self.Builder.CreateNot(Cond);
}
return nullptr;
}
// PHINode simplification
//
Instruction *InstCombiner::visitPHINode(PHINode &PN) {
@ -1345,9 +1276,5 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitPHINode(PHINode &PN) {
if (Instruction *Res = SliceUpIllegalIntegerPHI(PN))
return Res;
// Ultimately, try to replace this Phi with a dominating condition.
if (auto *V = SimplifyUsingControlFlow(*this, PN, DT))
return replaceInstUsesWith(PN, V);
return nullptr;
}

View File

@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ declare void @dummy1(%struct.bitmap*, %struct.bitmap*, %struct.bitmap*, %struct.
;CHECK-LABEL: NextCond.split:
;CHECK: call void @dummy3()
;CheCK-LABEL: CallSiteBB:
;CHECK: [[NEG:%.*]] = xor i1 %tobool1, true
;CHECK: call void @foo(i1 [[NEG]])
;CHECK: %phi.call = phi i1 [ true, %NextCond.split ], [ false, %Top.split ]
;CHECK: call void @foo(i1 %phi.call)
define void @caller2(i1 %c, %struct.bitmap* %a_elt, %struct.bitmap* %b_elt, %struct.bitmap* %c_elt) {
entry:
br label %Top

View File

@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ patatino:
ret i32 %x
}
; TODO: Simplify this to "ret cond".
define i1 @test01(i1 %cond) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test01(
; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
@ -41,13 +42,15 @@ define i1 @test01(i1 %cond) {
; CHECK: if.false.1:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[MERGE_1]]
; CHECK: merge.1:
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[COND]], label [[IF_TRUE_2:%.*]], label [[IF_FALSE_2:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[MERGE_COND_1:%.*]] = phi i1 [ true, [[IF_TRUE_1]] ], [ false, [[IF_FALSE_1]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[MERGE_COND_1]], label [[IF_TRUE_2:%.*]], label [[IF_FALSE_2:%.*]]
; CHECK: if.true.2:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[MERGE_2:%.*]]
; CHECK: if.false.2:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[MERGE_2]]
; CHECK: merge.2:
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[COND]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[MERGE_COND_2:%.*]] = phi i1 [ true, [[IF_TRUE_2]] ], [ false, [[IF_FALSE_2]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[MERGE_COND_2]]
;
entry:
br i1 %cond, label %if.true.1, label %if.false.1
@ -73,6 +76,7 @@ merge.2:
ret i1 %merge.cond.2
}
; TODO: Simplify this to "ret %cond".
define i1 @test02(i1 %cond) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test02(
; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
@ -82,13 +86,15 @@ define i1 @test02(i1 %cond) {
; CHECK: if.false.1:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[MERGE_1]]
; CHECK: merge.1:
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[COND]], label [[IF_FALSE_2:%.*]], label [[IF_TRUE_2:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[MERGE_COND_1:%.*]] = phi i1 [ false, [[IF_TRUE_1]] ], [ true, [[IF_FALSE_1]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[MERGE_COND_1]], label [[IF_TRUE_2:%.*]], label [[IF_FALSE_2:%.*]]
; CHECK: if.true.2:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[MERGE_2:%.*]]
; CHECK: if.false.2:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[MERGE_2]]
; CHECK: merge.2:
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[COND]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[MERGE_COND_2:%.*]] = phi i1 [ false, [[IF_TRUE_2]] ], [ true, [[IF_FALSE_2]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[MERGE_COND_2]]
;
entry:
br i1 %cond, label %if.true.1, label %if.false.1

View File

@ -11,10 +11,10 @@ define i1 @test_eq(i1 %cond) {
; CHECK: if.false:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[MERGE]]
; CHECK: merge:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[COMPARE:%.*]] = phi i1 [ true, [[IF_FALSE]] ], [ false, [[IF_TRUE]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[EXIT:%.*]]
; CHECK: exit:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP0:%.*]] = xor i1 [[COND]], true
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[TMP0]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[COMPARE]]
;
entry:
br i1 %cond, label %if.true, label %if.false
@ -43,9 +43,10 @@ define i1 @test_slt(i1 %cond) {
; CHECK: if.false:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[MERGE]]
; CHECK: merge:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[COMPARE:%.*]] = phi i1 [ false, [[IF_FALSE]] ], [ true, [[IF_TRUE]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[EXIT:%.*]]
; CHECK: exit:
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[COND]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[COMPARE]]
;
entry:
br i1 %cond, label %if.true, label %if.false
@ -105,9 +106,10 @@ define i1 @test_ne(i1 %cond) {
; CHECK: if.false:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[MERGE]]
; CHECK: merge:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[COMPARE:%.*]] = phi i1 [ false, [[IF_FALSE]] ], [ true, [[IF_TRUE]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[EXIT:%.*]]
; CHECK: exit:
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[COND]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[COMPARE]]
;
entry:
br i1 %cond, label %if.true, label %if.false

View File

@ -416,11 +416,10 @@ bb1: ; preds = %entry
bb2: ; preds = %bb1, %entry
%cond = phi i1 [ true, %bb1 ], [ false, %entry ] ; <i1> [#uses=1]
; CHECK-NOT: phi i1
; CHECK: %res = phi i32 [ %0, %bb1 ], [ 0, %entry ]
; CHECK: ret i32 %res
; CHECK-NOT: %val = phi i32 [ %0, %bb1 ], [ 0, %entry ]
%val = phi i32 [ %0, %bb1 ], [ 0, %entry ] ; <i32> [#uses=1]
%res = select i1 %cond, i32 %val, i32 0 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
; CHECK: ret i32 %cond
ret i32 %res
}

View File

@ -448,8 +448,8 @@ define i32 @test25(i1 %c) {
; CHECK: jump:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[RET]]
; CHECK: ret:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[B:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 10, [[JUMP]] ], [ 20, [[ENTRY:%.*]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[B]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[A:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 10, [[JUMP]] ], [ 20, [[ENTRY:%.*]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[A]]
;
entry:
br i1 %c, label %jump, label %ret
@ -468,8 +468,8 @@ define i32 @test26(i1 %cond) {
; CHECK: jump:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[RET]]
; CHECK: ret:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[B:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 10, [[JUMP]] ], [ 20, [[ENTRY:%.*]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[B]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[A:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 20, [[ENTRY:%.*]] ], [ 10, [[JUMP]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[A]]
;
entry:
br i1 %cond, label %jump, label %ret
@ -489,8 +489,8 @@ define i32 @test27(i1 %c, i32 %A, i32 %B) {
; CHECK: jump:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[RET]]
; CHECK: ret:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[S:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[A:%.*]], [[JUMP]] ], [ [[B:%.*]], [[ENTRY:%.*]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[S]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[P:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[A:%.*]], [[JUMP]] ], [ [[B:%.*]], [[ENTRY:%.*]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[P]]
;
entry:
br i1 %c, label %jump, label %ret
@ -509,8 +509,8 @@ define i32 @test28(i1 %cond, i32 %A, i32 %B) {
; CHECK: jump:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[RET]]
; CHECK: ret:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[S:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[A:%.*]], [[JUMP]] ], [ [[B:%.*]], [[ENTRY:%.*]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[S]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[P:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[A:%.*]], [[JUMP]] ], [ [[B:%.*]], [[ENTRY:%.*]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[P]]
;
entry:
br i1 %cond, label %jump, label %ret
@ -530,10 +530,10 @@ define i32 @test29(i1 %cond, i32 %A, i32 %B) {
; CHECK: jump:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[RET]]
; CHECK: ret:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[S:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[A:%.*]], [[JUMP]] ], [ [[B:%.*]], [[ENTRY:%.*]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[P:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[A:%.*]], [[JUMP]] ], [ [[B:%.*]], [[ENTRY:%.*]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[NEXT:%.*]]
; CHECK: next:
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[S]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[P]]
;
entry:
br i1 %cond, label %jump, label %ret

View File

@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
; RUN: opt -S < %s -instcombine | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -S < %s -passes=instcombine | FileCheck %s
; TODO: Simplify to "ret cond".
define i1 @test_direct_implication(i1 %cond) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_direct_implication(
; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
@ -11,7 +12,8 @@ define i1 @test_direct_implication(i1 %cond) {
; CHECK: if.false:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[MERGE]]
; CHECK: merge:
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[COND]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[RET:%.*]] = phi i1 [ true, [[IF_TRUE]] ], [ false, [[IF_FALSE]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[RET]]
;
entry:
br i1 %cond, label %if.true, label %if.false
@ -27,6 +29,7 @@ merge:
ret i1 %ret
}
; TODO: Simplify to "ret !cond".
define i1 @test_inverted_implication(i1 %cond) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_inverted_implication(
; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
@ -36,8 +39,8 @@ define i1 @test_inverted_implication(i1 %cond) {
; CHECK: if.false:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[MERGE]]
; CHECK: merge:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP0:%.*]] = xor i1 [[COND]], true
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[TMP0]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[RET:%.*]] = phi i1 [ false, [[IF_TRUE]] ], [ true, [[IF_FALSE]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[RET]]
;
entry:
br i1 %cond, label %if.true, label %if.false
@ -53,6 +56,7 @@ merge:
ret i1 %ret
}
; TODO: Simplify to "ret cond".
define i1 @test_direct_implication_complex_cfg(i1 %cond, i32 %cnt1) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_direct_implication_complex_cfg(
; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
@ -69,7 +73,8 @@ define i1 @test_direct_implication_complex_cfg(i1 %cond, i32 %cnt1) {
; CHECK: if.false:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[MERGE]]
; CHECK: merge:
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[COND]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[RET:%.*]] = phi i1 [ true, [[IF_TRUE_END]] ], [ false, [[IF_FALSE]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[RET]]
;
entry:
br i1 %cond, label %if.true, label %if.false
@ -94,6 +99,7 @@ merge:
ret i1 %ret
}
; TODO: Simplify to "ret !cond".
define i1 @test_inverted_implication_complex_cfg(i1 %cond, i32 %cnt1) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_inverted_implication_complex_cfg(
; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
@ -110,8 +116,8 @@ define i1 @test_inverted_implication_complex_cfg(i1 %cond, i32 %cnt1) {
; CHECK: if.false:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[MERGE]]
; CHECK: merge:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP0:%.*]] = xor i1 [[COND]], true
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[TMP0]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[RET:%.*]] = phi i1 [ false, [[IF_TRUE_END]] ], [ true, [[IF_FALSE]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[RET]]
;
entry:
br i1 %cond, label %if.true, label %if.false

View File

@ -18,16 +18,16 @@ define i1 @PR33605(i32 %a, i32 %b, i32* %c) {
; ALL-NEXT: call void @foo()
; ALL-NEXT: br label [[IF_END]]
; ALL: if.end:
; ALL-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = xor i1 [[CMP]], true
; ALL-NEXT: [[TMP2:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[C]], align 4
; ALL-NEXT: [[CMP_1:%.*]] = icmp eq i32 [[OR]], [[TMP2]]
; ALL-NEXT: [[CHANGED_1_OFF0:%.*]] = phi i1 [ true, [[IF_THEN]] ], [ false, [[ENTRY:%.*]] ]
; ALL-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[C]], align 4
; ALL-NEXT: [[CMP_1:%.*]] = icmp eq i32 [[OR]], [[TMP1]]
; ALL-NEXT: br i1 [[CMP_1]], label [[IF_END_1:%.*]], label [[IF_THEN_1:%.*]]
; ALL: if.then.1:
; ALL-NEXT: store i32 [[OR]], i32* [[C]], align 4
; ALL-NEXT: call void @foo()
; ALL-NEXT: br label [[IF_END_1]]
; ALL: if.end.1:
; ALL-NEXT: [[CHANGED_1_OFF0_1:%.*]] = phi i1 [ true, [[IF_THEN_1]] ], [ [[TMP1]], [[IF_END]] ]
; ALL-NEXT: [[CHANGED_1_OFF0_1:%.*]] = phi i1 [ true, [[IF_THEN_1]] ], [ [[CHANGED_1_OFF0]], [[IF_END]] ]
; ALL-NEXT: ret i1 [[CHANGED_1_OFF0_1]]
;
entry: