forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[InstCombine] canonicalize zext-and-of-bool compare to narrow and
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/3jYbEH We should choose one of these forms, and the option that uses the narrow type allows the motivating example from issue #56294 to reduce. In the best case (no 'not' needed and 'trunc' remains), this does remove an instruction. Note that there is what looks like a regression because there is an existing canonicalization that turns trunc into and+icmp. That is a long-standing transform, and I'm not sure what effect reversing it would have.
This commit is contained in:
parent
26821f75ed
commit
b5a9361c90
|
@ -1904,6 +1904,19 @@ Instruction *InstCombinerImpl::foldICmpAndConstant(ICmpInst &Cmp,
|
|||
return new ICmpInst(NewPred, X, SubOne(cast<Constant>(Cmp.getOperand(1))));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ((zext i1 X) & Y) == 0 --> !((trunc Y) & X)
|
||||
// ((zext i1 X) & Y) != 0 --> ((trunc Y) & X)
|
||||
if (match(And, m_OneUse(m_c_And(m_OneUse(m_ZExt(m_Value(X))), m_Value(Y)))) &&
|
||||
C.isZero() && X->getType()->isIntOrIntVectorTy(1)) {
|
||||
Value *TruncY = Builder.CreateTrunc(Y, X->getType());
|
||||
if (Pred == CmpInst::ICMP_EQ) {
|
||||
Value *And = Builder.CreateAnd(TruncY, X);
|
||||
return BinaryOperator::CreateNot(And);
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert(Pred == CmpInst::ICMP_NE && "Unexpected predicate");
|
||||
return BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(TruncY, X);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return nullptr;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -4345,11 +4345,7 @@ define i32 @or_sext_sext_use1(i8 %x, i4 %y) {
|
|||
define i1 @PR56294(i8 %x) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@PR56294
|
||||
; CHECK-SAME: (i8 [[X:%.*]]) {
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[T2:%.*]] = icmp eq i8 [[X]], 2
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = zext i1 [[T2]] to i8
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP2:%.*]] = and i8 [[TMP1]], [[X]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[T7:%.*]] = icmp ne i8 [[TMP2]], 0
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[T7]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 false
|
||||
;
|
||||
%t2 = icmp eq i8 %x, 2
|
||||
%t3 = and i8 %x, 1
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -4113,9 +4113,10 @@ define i1 @signbit_true_logic_uses_commute(i64 %x) {
|
|||
|
||||
define i1 @zext_bool_and_eq0(i1 %x, i8 %y) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @zext_bool_and_eq0(
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[ZX:%.*]] = zext i1 [[X:%.*]] to i8
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[A:%.*]] = and i8 [[ZX]], [[Y:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[R:%.*]] = icmp eq i8 [[A]], 0
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = and i8 [[Y:%.*]], 1
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP2:%.*]] = icmp ne i8 [[TMP1]], 0
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP3:%.*]] = and i1 [[TMP2]], [[X:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[R:%.*]] = xor i1 [[TMP3]], true
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[R]]
|
||||
;
|
||||
%zx = zext i1 %x to i8
|
||||
|
@ -4126,9 +4127,9 @@ define i1 @zext_bool_and_eq0(i1 %x, i8 %y) {
|
|||
|
||||
define <2 x i1> @zext_bool_and_eq0_commute(<2 x i1> %x, <2 x i8> %p) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @zext_bool_and_eq0_commute(
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[ZX:%.*]] = zext <2 x i1> [[X:%.*]] to <2 x i8>
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[A:%.*]] = and <2 x i8> [[ZX]], [[P:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[R:%.*]] = icmp eq <2 x i8> [[A]], zeroinitializer
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = trunc <2 x i8> [[P:%.*]] to <2 x i1>
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP2:%.*]] = and <2 x i1> [[TMP1]], [[X:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[R:%.*]] = xor <2 x i1> [[TMP2]], <i1 true, i1 true>
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret <2 x i1> [[R]]
|
||||
;
|
||||
%y = mul <2 x i8> %p, %p ; thwart complexity-based canonicalization
|
||||
|
@ -4140,9 +4141,9 @@ define <2 x i1> @zext_bool_and_eq0_commute(<2 x i1> %x, <2 x i8> %p) {
|
|||
|
||||
define i1 @zext_bool_and_ne0(i1 %x, i8 %y) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @zext_bool_and_ne0(
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[ZX:%.*]] = zext i1 [[X:%.*]] to i8
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[A:%.*]] = and i8 [[ZX]], [[Y:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[R:%.*]] = icmp ne i8 [[A]], 0
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = and i8 [[Y:%.*]], 1
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP2:%.*]] = icmp ne i8 [[TMP1]], 0
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[R:%.*]] = and i1 [[TMP2]], [[X:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[R]]
|
||||
;
|
||||
%zx = zext i1 %x to i8
|
||||
|
@ -4151,6 +4152,8 @@ define i1 @zext_bool_and_ne0(i1 %x, i8 %y) {
|
|||
ret i1 %r
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
; TODO: This should transform similarly to eq/ne 0.
|
||||
|
||||
define i1 @zext_bool_and_ne1(i1 %x, i8 %y) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @zext_bool_and_ne1(
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[ZX:%.*]] = zext i1 [[X:%.*]] to i8
|
||||
|
@ -4164,6 +4167,8 @@ define i1 @zext_bool_and_ne1(i1 %x, i8 %y) {
|
|||
ret i1 %r
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
; negative test - wrong logic op
|
||||
|
||||
define i1 @zext_bool_or_eq0(i1 %x, i8 %y) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @zext_bool_or_eq0(
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[ZX:%.*]] = zext i1 [[X:%.*]] to i8
|
||||
|
@ -4177,6 +4182,8 @@ define i1 @zext_bool_or_eq0(i1 %x, i8 %y) {
|
|||
ret i1 %r
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
; negative test - extra use
|
||||
|
||||
define i1 @zext_bool_and_eq0_use(i1 %x, i64 %y) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @zext_bool_and_eq0_use(
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[ZX:%.*]] = zext i1 [[X:%.*]] to i64
|
||||
|
@ -4192,6 +4199,8 @@ define i1 @zext_bool_and_eq0_use(i1 %x, i64 %y) {
|
|||
ret i1 %r
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
; negative test - extra use
|
||||
|
||||
define i1 @zext_bool_and_ne0_use(i1 %x, i64 %y) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @zext_bool_and_ne0_use(
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[ZX:%.*]] = zext i1 [[X:%.*]] to i64
|
||||
|
@ -4207,6 +4216,8 @@ define i1 @zext_bool_and_ne0_use(i1 %x, i64 %y) {
|
|||
ret i1 %r
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
; negative test - must zext from i1
|
||||
|
||||
define i1 @zext_notbool_and_ne0(i2 %x, i8 %y) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @zext_notbool_and_ne0(
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[ZX:%.*]] = zext i2 [[X:%.*]] to i8
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue