maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity

Use EXPECT_FALSE instead of EXPECT_EQ(false, ... 

Commit https://reviews.llvm.org/rL324489 added

    EXPECT_EQ(false, N->isUnsigned());

which older GCC versions dislike for some reason. Anyway, it looks like the
proper GTest way is to use EXPECT_FALSE, etc.


Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43233

llvm-svn: 325121
This commit is contained in:
Momchil Velikov 2018-02-14 13:11:56 +00:00
parent 01df519f7e
commit af6312a479
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
llvm/unittests/IR/MetadataTest.cpp
View File

@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ TEST_F(DIEnumeratorTest, get) {
auto *N = DIEnumerator::get(Context, 7, false, "name");
EXPECT_EQ(dwarf::DW_TAG_enumerator, N->getTag());
EXPECT_EQ(7, N->getValue());
EXPECT_EQ(false, N->isUnsigned());
EXPECT_FALSE(N->isUnsigned());
EXPECT_EQ("name", N->getName());
EXPECT_EQ(N, DIEnumerator::get(Context, 7, false, "name"));