maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity

Forgot to mention rewriting CommandObject::DoExecute 

using the SB API's not the lldb_private API's.

llvm-svn: 304379
This commit is contained in:
Jim Ingham 2017-06-01 01:05:30 +00:00
parent 6b41141863
commit ab194a26da
1 changed files with 19 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

19
lldb/www/projects.html
View File

@ -243,6 +243,25 @@
</p>
</li>
<li>
Reimplement the command interpreter commands using the SB API
<p>
Currently, all the CommandObject::DoExecute methods are implemented
using the lldb_private API's. That generally means that there's code
that gets duplicated between the CommandObject and the SB API that does
roughly the same thing. We would reduce this code duplication, present a
single coherent face to the users of lldb, and keep
ourselves more honest about what we need in the SB API's if we implemented
the CommandObjects::DoExecute methods using the SB API's.
</p>
<p>
BTW, it is only the way it was much easier to develop lldb if it had a functioning
command-line early on. So we did that first, and developed the SB API's when lldb
was more mature. There's no good technical reason to have the commands use the
lldb_private API's.
</p>
</li>
<li>
Documentation and better examples