forked from OSchip/llvm-project
Second part of pr16069
The problem this time seems to be a thinko. We were assuming that in the CFG A | \ | B | / C speculating the basic block B would cause only the phi value for the B->C edge to be speculated. That is not true, the phi's are semantically in the edges, so if the A->B->C path is taken, any code needed for A->C is not executed and we have to consider it too when deciding to speculate B. llvm-svn: 183226
This commit is contained in:
parent
863746eb1a
commit
a5e536ab0e
|
@ -1537,18 +1537,23 @@ static bool SpeculativelyExecuteBB(BranchInst *BI, BasicBlock *ThenBB) {
|
|||
Value *OrigV = PN->getIncomingValueForBlock(BB);
|
||||
Value *ThenV = PN->getIncomingValueForBlock(ThenBB);
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME: Try to remove some of the duplication with HoistThenElseCodeToIf.
|
||||
// Skip PHIs which are trivial.
|
||||
if (ThenV == OrigV)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
HaveRewritablePHIs = true;
|
||||
ConstantExpr *CE = dyn_cast<ConstantExpr>(ThenV);
|
||||
if (!CE)
|
||||
ConstantExpr *OrigCE = dyn_cast<ConstantExpr>(OrigV);
|
||||
ConstantExpr *ThenCE = dyn_cast<ConstantExpr>(ThenV);
|
||||
if (!OrigCE && !ThenCE)
|
||||
continue; // Known safe and cheap.
|
||||
|
||||
if (!isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute(CE))
|
||||
if ((ThenCE && !isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute(ThenCE)) ||
|
||||
(OrigCE && !isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute(OrigCE)))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
if (ComputeSpeculationCost(CE) > PHINodeFoldingThreshold)
|
||||
unsigned OrigCost = OrigCE ? ComputeSpeculationCost(OrigCE) : 0;
|
||||
unsigned ThenCost = ThenCE ? ComputeSpeculationCost(ThenCE) : 0;
|
||||
if (OrigCost + ThenCost > 2 * PHINodeFoldingThreshold)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// Account for the cost of an unfolded ConstantExpr which could end up
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
|
|||
; RUN: opt < %s -simplifycfg -S | FileCheck %s
|
||||
|
||||
; CHECK-NOT: select
|
||||
@b = extern_weak global i32
|
||||
|
||||
define i32 @foo(i1 %y) {
|
||||
; CHECK: define i32 @foo(i1 %y) {
|
||||
br i1 %y, label %bb1, label %bb2
|
||||
bb1:
|
||||
br label %bb3
|
||||
|
@ -10,5 +11,18 @@ bb2:
|
|||
br label %bb3
|
||||
bb3:
|
||||
%cond.i = phi i32 [ 0, %bb1 ], [ srem (i32 1, i32 zext (i1 icmp eq (i32* @b, i32* null) to i32)), %bb2 ]
|
||||
; CHECK: phi i32 {{.*}} srem (i32 1, i32 zext (i1 icmp eq (i32* @b, i32* null) to i32)), %bb2
|
||||
ret i32 %cond.i
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
define i32 @foo2(i1 %x) {
|
||||
; CHECK: define i32 @foo2(i1 %x) {
|
||||
bb0:
|
||||
br i1 %x, label %bb1, label %bb2
|
||||
bb1:
|
||||
br label %bb2
|
||||
bb2:
|
||||
%cond = phi i32 [ 0, %bb1 ], [ srem (i32 1, i32 zext (i1 icmp eq (i32* @b, i32* null) to i32)), %bb0 ]
|
||||
; CHECK: %cond = phi i32 [ 0, %bb1 ], [ srem (i32 1, i32 zext (i1 icmp eq (i32* @b, i32* null) to i32)), %bb0 ]
|
||||
ret i32 %cond
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue