forked from OSchip/llvm-project
vst instructions are modeled as this:
v1024 = REG_SEQUENCE ... v1025 = EXTRACT_SUBREG v1024, 5 v1026 = EXTRACR_SUBREG v1024, 6 = VSTxx <addr>, v1025, v1026 The REG_SEQUENCE ensures the sources that feed into the VST instruction are getting the right register allocation so they form a large super- register. The extract_subreg will be coalesced away all would just work: v1024 = REG_SEQUENCE ... = VSTxx <addr>, v1024:5, v1024:6 The problem is if the coalescer isn't run, the extract_subreg instructions would stick around and there is no assurance v1025 and v1026 will get the right registers. As a short term workaround, teach the NEON pre-allocation pass to transfer the sub-register indices over. An alternative would be do it 2addr pass when reg_sequence's are eliminated. But that *seems* wrong and require updating liveness information. Another alternative is to do this in the scheduler when the instructions are created. But that would mean somehow the scheduler this has to be done for correctness reason. That's yucky as well. So for now, we are leaving this in the target specific pass. llvm-svn: 103540
This commit is contained in:
parent
d593448643
commit
a2ff4fc96a
|
@ -379,6 +379,7 @@ NEONPreAllocPass::FormsRegSequence(MachineInstr *MI,
|
|||
|
||||
unsigned LastSrcReg = 0;
|
||||
unsigned LastSubIdx = 0;
|
||||
SmallVector<unsigned, 4> SubIds;
|
||||
for (unsigned R = 0; R < NumRegs; ++R) {
|
||||
const MachineOperand &MO = MI->getOperand(FirstOpnd + R);
|
||||
assert(MO.isReg() && MO.getSubReg() == 0 && "unexpected operand");
|
||||
|
@ -405,8 +406,33 @@ NEONPreAllocPass::FormsRegSequence(MachineInstr *MI,
|
|||
if (SubIdx != ARM::DSUBREG_0 && SubIdx != ARM::QSUBREG_0)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
SubIds.push_back(SubIdx);
|
||||
LastSubIdx = SubIdx;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME: Update the uses of EXTRACT_SUBREG from REG_SEQUENCE is
|
||||
// currently required for correctness. e.g.
|
||||
// %reg1041;<def> = REG_SEQUENCE %reg1040<kill>, 5, %reg1035<kill>, 6
|
||||
// %reg1042<def> = EXTRACT_SUBREG %reg1041, 6
|
||||
// %reg1043<def> = EXTRACT_SUBREG %reg1041, 5
|
||||
// VST1q16 %reg1025<kill>, 0, %reg1043<kill>, %reg1042<kill>,
|
||||
// reg1025 and reg1043 should be replaced with reg1041:6 and reg1041:5
|
||||
// respectively.
|
||||
// We need to change how we model uses of REG_SEQUENCE.
|
||||
for (unsigned R = 0; R < NumRegs; ++R) {
|
||||
MachineOperand &MO = MI->getOperand(FirstOpnd + R);
|
||||
unsigned OldReg = MO.getReg();
|
||||
MachineInstr *DefMI = MRI->getVRegDef(OldReg);
|
||||
assert(DefMI->isExtractSubreg());
|
||||
MO.setReg(LastSrcReg);
|
||||
MO.setSubReg(SubIds[R]);
|
||||
if (R != 0)
|
||||
MO.setIsKill(false);
|
||||
// Delete the EXTRACT_SUBREG if its result is now dead.
|
||||
if (MRI->use_empty(OldReg))
|
||||
DefMI->eraseFromParent();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue