forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[SCEV] Infer known bits from known sign bits
This was suggested by lebedev.ri over on D96534. You'll note lack of tests. During review, we weren't actually able to find a case which exercises it, but both I and lebedev.ri feel it's a reasonable change, straight forward, and near free. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97064
This commit is contained in:
parent
63200a058e
commit
a25b537bf4
|
@ -5848,24 +5848,31 @@ ScalarEvolution::getRangeRef(const SCEV *S,
|
|||
KnownBits Known = computeKnownBits(U->getValue(), DL, 0, &AC, nullptr, &DT);
|
||||
if (Known.getBitWidth() != BitWidth)
|
||||
Known = Known.zextOrTrunc(BitWidth);
|
||||
// If Known does not result in full-set, intersect with it.
|
||||
if (Known.getMinValue() != Known.getMaxValue() + 1)
|
||||
ConservativeResult = ConservativeResult.intersectWith(
|
||||
ConstantRange(Known.getMinValue(), Known.getMaxValue() + 1),
|
||||
RangeType);
|
||||
|
||||
// ValueTracking may be able to compute a tighter result for the number of
|
||||
// sign bits than for the value of those sign bits.
|
||||
unsigned NS = ComputeNumSignBits(U->getValue(), DL, 0, &AC, nullptr, &DT);
|
||||
// If the pointer size is larger than the index size type, this can cause
|
||||
// NS to be larger than BitWidth. So compensate for this.
|
||||
if (U->getType()->isPointerTy()) {
|
||||
// If the pointer size is larger than the index size type, this can cause
|
||||
// NS to be larger than BitWidth. So compensate for this.
|
||||
unsigned ptrSize = DL.getPointerTypeSizeInBits(U->getType());
|
||||
int ptrIdxDiff = ptrSize - BitWidth;
|
||||
if (ptrIdxDiff > 0 && ptrSize > BitWidth && NS > (unsigned)ptrIdxDiff)
|
||||
NS -= ptrIdxDiff;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (NS > 1) {
|
||||
// If we know any of the sign bits, we know all of the sign bits.
|
||||
if (!Known.Zero.getHiBits(NS).isNullValue())
|
||||
Known.Zero.setHighBits(NS);
|
||||
if (!Known.One.getHiBits(NS).isNullValue())
|
||||
Known.One.setHighBits(NS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (Known.getMinValue() != Known.getMaxValue() + 1)
|
||||
ConservativeResult = ConservativeResult.intersectWith(
|
||||
ConstantRange(Known.getMinValue(), Known.getMaxValue() + 1),
|
||||
RangeType);
|
||||
if (NS > 1)
|
||||
ConservativeResult = ConservativeResult.intersectWith(
|
||||
ConstantRange(APInt::getSignedMinValue(BitWidth).ashr(NS - 1),
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue