From 9f2bca02d7e7b7eaa9227007639f489fd416357a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Anderson <resistor@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 18:32:46 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Experiments show that we can safely increase our unrolling
 threshold without unduly impacting code size, particularly since unrolling is
 not enabled at -Os.

llvm-svn: 110233
---
 llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnrollPass.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnrollPass.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnrollPass.cpp
index 3d446f0f3793..37ab3b0b5bca 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnrollPass.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnrollPass.cpp
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
 using namespace llvm;
 
 static cl::opt<unsigned>
-UnrollThreshold("unroll-threshold", cl::init(100), cl::Hidden,
+UnrollThreshold("unroll-threshold", cl::init(200), cl::Hidden,
   cl::desc("The cut-off point for automatic loop unrolling"));
 
 static cl::opt<unsigned>