When checking a set of template parameter lists against a

nested-name-specifier, re-evaluate the nested-name-specifier as if we
were entering that context (which we did!), so that we'll resolve a
template-id to a particular class template partial
specialization. Fixes PR9913.

llvm-svn: 131383
This commit is contained in:
Douglas Gregor 2011-05-15 17:27:27 +00:00
parent af18d07ed6
commit 9d07dfa439
3 changed files with 18 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ bool Sema::BuildCXXNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S,
// class-name or namespace-name. [...]
//
// Qualified name lookup into a class will not find a namespace-name,
// so we do not need to diagnoste that case specifically. However,
// so we do not need to diagnose that case specifically. However,
// this qualified name lookup may find nothing. In that case, perform
// unqualified name lookup in the given scope (if available) or
// reconstruct the result from when name lookup was performed at template

View File

@ -1513,8 +1513,13 @@ Sema::MatchTemplateParametersToScopeSpecifier(SourceLocation DeclStartLoc,
// by the nested-name-specifier and walking out until we run out of types.
llvm::SmallVector<QualType, 4> NestedTypes;
QualType T;
if (SS.getScopeRep())
T = QualType(SS.getScopeRep()->getAsType(), 0);
if (SS.getScopeRep()) {
if (CXXRecordDecl *Record
= dyn_cast_or_null<CXXRecordDecl>(computeDeclContext(SS, true)))
T = Context.getTypeDeclType(Record);
else
T = QualType(SS.getScopeRep()->getAsType(), 0);
}
// If we found an explicit specialization that prevents us from needing
// 'template<>' headers, this will be set to the location of that

View File

@ -166,3 +166,13 @@ namespace PR9877 {
template<> const int X<1>::Y::Z; // expected-error{{extraneous 'template<>' in declaration of variable 'Z'}}
}
namespace PR9913 {
template<class,class=int>struct S;
template<class X>struct S<X> {
template<class T> class F;
};
template<class A>
template<class B>
class S<A>::F{};
}