From 99fe42fbd9c31abd0a9238b4b253d89230d0978b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chandler Carruth Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:35:36 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Relax an invariant that block placement was trying to assert a bit further. This invariant just wasn't going to work in the face of unanalyzable branches; we need to be resillient to the phenomenon of chains poking into a loop and poking out of a loop. In fact, we already were, we just needed to not assert on it. This was found during a bootstrap with block placement turned on. llvm-svn: 145100 --- llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineBlockPlacement.cpp | 4 +--- llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/block-placement.ll | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineBlockPlacement.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineBlockPlacement.cpp index 0d15e8a726fc..45d5af293039 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineBlockPlacement.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineBlockPlacement.cpp @@ -504,7 +504,6 @@ void MachineBlockPlacement::buildChain( const BlockFilterSet *BlockFilter) { assert(BB); assert(BlockToChain[BB] == &Chain); - assert(*Chain.begin() == BB); MachineFunction &F = *BB->getParent(); MachineFunction::iterator PrevUnplacedBlockIt = F.begin(); @@ -614,8 +613,7 @@ void MachineBlockPlacement::buildLoopChains(MachineFunction &F, if (!LoopBlockSet.erase(*BCI)) { // We don't mark the loop as bad here because there are real situations // where this can occur. For example, with an unanalyzable fallthrough - // from a loop block to a non-loop block. - // FIXME: Such constructs shouldn't exist. Track them down and fix them. + // from a loop block to a non-loop block or vice versa. dbgs() << "Loop chain contains a block not contained by the loop!\n" << " Loop header: " << getBlockName(*L.block_begin()) << "\n" << " Chain header: " << getBlockName(*LoopChain.begin()) << "\n" diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/block-placement.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/block-placement.ll index c03b03ed02d8..782e15425137 100644 --- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/block-placement.ll +++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/block-placement.ll @@ -568,3 +568,28 @@ loop3: %next.phi = phi i32* [ %next.load, %loop2b ], [ %next.var, %loop2a ] br label %loop1 } + +define void @unanalyzable_branch_to_loop_header() { +; Ensure that we can handle unanalyzable branches into loop headers. We +; pre-form chains for unanalyzable branches, and will find the tail end of that +; at the start of the loop. This function uses floating point comparison +; fallthrough because that happens to always produce unanalyzable branches on +; x86. +; +; CHECK: unanalyzable_branch_to_loop_header +; CHECK: %entry +; CHECK: %loop +; CHECK: %exit + +entry: + %cmp = fcmp une double 0.000000e+00, undef + br i1 %cmp, label %loop, label %exit + +loop: + %cond = icmp eq i8 undef, 42 + br i1 %cond, label %exit, label %loop + +exit: + ret void +} +