forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[InstCombine] Don't push operation across loop phi
When pushing an operation across a phi node, we should avoid doing so across a loop backedge. This is generally non-profitable, because it does not reduce the number of times the operation is executed, and could lead to an infinite combine loop. The code was already guarding against this, but using an insufficiently strong condition, which did not cover the case where the operation was originally outside the loop (in which case the transform moves the operation from outside the loop into the loop, which is particularly undesirable). Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127499
This commit is contained in:
parent
2a3288776c
commit
92a9b1c918
|
@ -1177,10 +1177,11 @@ Instruction *InstCombinerImpl::foldOpIntoPhi(Instruction &I, PHINode *PN) {
|
|||
if (cast<Instruction>(InVal)->getParent() == NonConstBB)
|
||||
return nullptr;
|
||||
|
||||
// If the incoming non-constant value is in I's block, we will remove one
|
||||
// instruction, but insert another equivalent one, leading to infinite
|
||||
// instcombine.
|
||||
if (isPotentiallyReachable(I.getParent(), NonConstBB, nullptr, &DT, LI))
|
||||
// If the incoming non-constant value is reachable from the phis block,
|
||||
// we'll push the operation across a loop backedge. This could result in
|
||||
// an infinite combine loop, and is generally non-profitable (especially
|
||||
// if the operation was originally outside the loop).
|
||||
if (isPotentiallyReachable(PN->getParent(), NonConstBB, nullptr, &DT, LI))
|
||||
return nullptr;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -320,15 +320,15 @@ define i8 @trunc_in_loop_exit_block() {
|
|||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[LOOP:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: loop:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 0, [[ENTRY:%.*]] ], [ [[IV_NEXT:%.*]], [[LOOP_LATCH:%.*]] ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[PHI:%.*]] = phi i8 [ 1, [[ENTRY]] ], [ [[PHI_CAST:%.*]], [[LOOP_LATCH]] ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[PHI:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 1, [[ENTRY]] ], [ [[IV_NEXT]], [[LOOP_LATCH]] ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp ult i32 [[IV]], 100
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[CMP]], label [[LOOP_LATCH]], label [[EXIT:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: loop.latch:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV_NEXT]] = add i32 [[IV]], 1
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[PHI_CAST]] = trunc i32 [[IV_NEXT]] to i8
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[LOOP]]
|
||||
; CHECK: exit:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i8 [[PHI]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TRUNC:%.*]] = trunc i32 [[PHI]] to i8
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i8 [[TRUNC]]
|
||||
;
|
||||
entry:
|
||||
br label %loop
|
||||
|
@ -353,16 +353,16 @@ define i32 @zext_in_loop_and_exit_block(i8 %step, i32 %end) {
|
|||
; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[LOOP:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: loop:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 0, [[ENTRY:%.*]] ], [ [[PHI_CAST:%.*]], [[LOOP_LATCH:%.*]] ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP_NOT:%.*]] = icmp eq i32 [[IV]], [[END:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV:%.*]] = phi i8 [ 0, [[ENTRY:%.*]] ], [ [[IV_NEXT:%.*]], [[LOOP_LATCH:%.*]] ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV_EXT:%.*]] = zext i8 [[IV]] to i32
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP_NOT:%.*]] = icmp eq i32 [[IV_EXT]], [[END:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[CMP_NOT]], label [[EXIT:%.*]], label [[LOOP_LATCH]]
|
||||
; CHECK: loop.latch:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV_TR:%.*]] = trunc i32 [[IV]] to i8
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV_NEXT_NARROW:%.*]] = add i8 [[IV_TR]], [[STEP:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[PHI_CAST]] = zext i8 [[IV_NEXT_NARROW]] to i32
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV_NEXT]] = add i8 [[IV]], [[STEP:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[LOOP]]
|
||||
; CHECK: exit:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[IV]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[EXT:%.*]] = zext i8 [[IV]] to i32
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[EXT]]
|
||||
;
|
||||
entry:
|
||||
br label %loop
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue