[clang] fixing conditional explicit for out-of-line definition PR42980

Summary: not every read in CXXConstructorDecl::getExplicitSpecifierInternal() was made on the canonical declaration.

Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman

Reviewed By: rsmith

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67889

llvm-svn: 372530
This commit is contained in:
Gauthier Harnisch 2019-09-22 21:59:10 +00:00
parent 638933acab
commit 914c4c306d
2 changed files with 22 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -2555,9 +2555,9 @@ class CXXConstructorDecl final
ExplicitSpecifier getExplicitSpecifierInternal() const {
if (CXXConstructorDeclBits.HasTrailingExplicitSpecifier)
return *getCanonicalDecl()->getTrailingObjects<ExplicitSpecifier>();
return *getTrailingObjects<ExplicitSpecifier>();
return ExplicitSpecifier(
nullptr, getCanonicalDecl()->CXXConstructorDeclBits.IsSimpleExplicit
nullptr, CXXConstructorDeclBits.IsSimpleExplicit
? ExplicitSpecKind::ResolvedTrue
: ExplicitSpecKind::ResolvedFalse);
}
@ -2598,10 +2598,10 @@ public:
InheritedConstructor Inherited = InheritedConstructor());
ExplicitSpecifier getExplicitSpecifier() {
return getExplicitSpecifierInternal();
return getCanonicalDecl()->getExplicitSpecifierInternal();
}
const ExplicitSpecifier getExplicitSpecifier() const {
return getExplicitSpecifierInternal();
return getCanonicalDecl()->getExplicitSpecifierInternal();
}
/// Return true if the declartion is already resolved to be explicit.

View File

@ -717,3 +717,21 @@ A d2{0, 0};
A d3 = {0.0, 0.0};// expected-error {{explicit deduction guide}}
}
namespace PR42980 {
using size_t = decltype(sizeof(0));
struct Str {// expected-note+ {{candidate constructor}}
template <size_t N>
explicit(N > 7)// expected-note {{resolved to true}}
Str(char const (&str)[N]);
};
template <size_t N>
Str::Str(char const(&str)[N]) { }
// expected-note@-1 {{candidate constructor}}
Str a = "short";
Str b = "not so short";// expected-error {{no viable conversion}}
}