PR12798: Don't drop part of the nested name specifier when instantiating a

pseudo-destructor expression. This can affect whether virtual dispatch for
the destructor call is bypassed.

llvm-svn: 156806
This commit is contained in:
Richard Smith 2012-05-15 06:15:11 +00:00
parent 5db7f6cb1e
commit 8e4a3868fe
2 changed files with 16 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -9268,7 +9268,11 @@ TreeTransform<Derived>::RebuildCXXPseudoDestructorExpr(Expr *Base,
DeclarationNameInfo NameInfo(Name, Destroyed.getLocation());
NameInfo.setNamedTypeInfo(DestroyedType);
// FIXME: the ScopeType should be tacked onto SS.
// The scope type is now known to be a valid nested name specifier
// component. Tack it on to the end of the nested name specifier.
if (ScopeType)
SS.Extend(SemaRef.Context, SourceLocation(),
ScopeType->getTypeLoc(), CCLoc);
SourceLocation TemplateKWLoc; // FIXME: retrieve it from caller.
return getSema().BuildMemberReferenceExpr(Base, BaseType,

View File

@ -46,3 +46,14 @@ C::~C() { }
// CHECK: call void @_ZdlPv
// Base dtor: just an alias to B's base dtor.
namespace PR12798 {
// A qualified call to a base class destructor should not undergo virtual
// dispatch. Template instantiation used to lose the qualifier.
struct A { virtual ~A(); };
template<typename T> void f(T *p) { p->A::~A(); }
// CHECK: define {{.*}} @_ZN7PR127981fINS_1AEEEvPT_(
// CHECK: call void @_ZN7PR127981AD1Ev(
template void f(A*);
}