forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[CGP] Rewrite pattern match for splitBranchCondition to work with Values instead.
Rewrite the pattern match code to work also with Values instead with Instructions only. Also remove the no longer need matcher (m_Instruction). llvm-svn: 223797
This commit is contained in:
parent
9cceddd074
commit
8bda738221
|
@ -68,10 +68,6 @@ struct class_match {
|
|||
|
||||
/// m_Value() - Match an arbitrary value and ignore it.
|
||||
inline class_match<Value> m_Value() { return class_match<Value>(); }
|
||||
/// m_Instruction() - Match an arbitrary instruction and ignore it.
|
||||
inline class_match<Instruction> m_Instruction() {
|
||||
return class_match<Instruction>();
|
||||
}
|
||||
/// m_BinOp() - Match an arbitrary binary operation and ignore it.
|
||||
inline class_match<BinaryOperator> m_BinOp() {
|
||||
return class_match<BinaryOperator>();
|
||||
|
@ -311,9 +307,6 @@ struct bind_ty {
|
|||
/// m_Value - Match a value, capturing it if we match.
|
||||
inline bind_ty<Value> m_Value(Value *&V) { return V; }
|
||||
|
||||
/// m_Instruction - Match a instruction, capturing it if we match.
|
||||
inline bind_ty<Instruction> m_Instruction(Instruction *&I) { return I; }
|
||||
|
||||
/// m_BinOp - Match a instruction, capturing it if we match.
|
||||
inline bind_ty<BinaryOperator> m_BinOp(BinaryOperator *&I) { return I; }
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -3869,12 +3869,12 @@ bool CodeGenPrepare::splitBranchCondition(Function &F) {
|
|||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned Opc;
|
||||
Instruction *Cond1, *Cond2;
|
||||
if (match(LogicOp, m_And(m_OneUse(m_Instruction(Cond1)),
|
||||
m_OneUse(m_Instruction(Cond2)))))
|
||||
Value *Cond1, *Cond2;
|
||||
if (match(LogicOp, m_And(m_OneUse(m_Value(Cond1)),
|
||||
m_OneUse(m_Value(Cond2)))))
|
||||
Opc = Instruction::And;
|
||||
else if (match(LogicOp, m_Or(m_OneUse(m_Instruction(Cond1)),
|
||||
m_OneUse(m_Instruction(Cond2)))))
|
||||
else if (match(LogicOp, m_Or(m_OneUse(m_Value(Cond1)),
|
||||
m_OneUse(m_Value(Cond2)))))
|
||||
Opc = Instruction::Or;
|
||||
else
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
@ -3897,7 +3897,7 @@ bool CodeGenPrepare::splitBranchCondition(Function &F) {
|
|||
auto *Br1 = cast<BranchInst>(BB.getTerminator());
|
||||
Br1->setCondition(Cond1);
|
||||
LogicOp->eraseFromParent();
|
||||
Cond2->removeFromParent();
|
||||
|
||||
// Depending on the conditon we have to either replace the true or the false
|
||||
// successor of the original branch instruction.
|
||||
if (Opc == Instruction::And)
|
||||
|
@ -3907,7 +3907,10 @@ bool CodeGenPrepare::splitBranchCondition(Function &F) {
|
|||
|
||||
// Fill in the new basic block.
|
||||
auto *Br2 = IRBuilder<>(TmpBB).CreateCondBr(Cond2, TBB, FBB);
|
||||
Cond2->insertBefore(Br2);
|
||||
if (auto *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(Cond2)) {
|
||||
I->removeFromParent();
|
||||
I->insertBefore(Br2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Update PHI nodes in both successors. The original BB needs to be
|
||||
// replaced in one succesor's PHI nodes, because the branch comes now from
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue