forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[InstCombine] restrict icmp fold with 2 sdiv exact operands (PR32949)
This is the InstCombine counterpart to D32954. I added some comments about the code duplication in: rL302436 Alive-based verification: http://rise4fun.com/Alive/dPw This is a 2nd fix for the problem reported in: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32949 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32970 llvm-svn: 303105
This commit is contained in:
parent
a23b141cd2
commit
878715f978
|
@ -3068,16 +3068,23 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::foldICmpBinOp(ICmpInst &I) {
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
break;
|
break;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
case Instruction::UDiv:
|
case Instruction::UDiv:
|
||||||
case Instruction::LShr:
|
case Instruction::LShr:
|
||||||
if (I.isSigned())
|
if (I.isSigned() || !BO0->isExact() || !BO1->isExact())
|
||||||
break;
|
break;
|
||||||
LLVM_FALLTHROUGH;
|
return new ICmpInst(Pred, BO0->getOperand(0), BO1->getOperand(0));
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
case Instruction::SDiv:
|
case Instruction::SDiv:
|
||||||
|
if (!I.isEquality() || !BO0->isExact() || !BO1->isExact())
|
||||||
|
break;
|
||||||
|
return new ICmpInst(Pred, BO0->getOperand(0), BO1->getOperand(0));
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
case Instruction::AShr:
|
case Instruction::AShr:
|
||||||
if (!BO0->isExact() || !BO1->isExact())
|
if (!BO0->isExact() || !BO1->isExact())
|
||||||
break;
|
break;
|
||||||
return new ICmpInst(Pred, BO0->getOperand(0), BO1->getOperand(0));
|
return new ICmpInst(Pred, BO0->getOperand(0), BO1->getOperand(0));
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
case Instruction::Shl: {
|
case Instruction::Shl: {
|
||||||
bool NUW = BO0->hasNoUnsignedWrap() && BO1->hasNoUnsignedWrap();
|
bool NUW = BO0->hasNoUnsignedWrap() && BO1->hasNoUnsignedWrap();
|
||||||
bool NSW = BO0->hasNoSignedWrap() && BO1->hasNoSignedWrap();
|
bool NSW = BO0->hasNoSignedWrap() && BO1->hasNoSignedWrap();
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -695,11 +695,13 @@ define i1 @test48(i32 %X, i32 %Y, i32 %Z) {
|
||||||
ret i1 %C
|
ret i1 %C
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
; FIXME: The above transform only works for equality predicates.
|
; The above transform only works for equality predicates.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
define i1 @PR32949(i32 %X, i32 %Y, i32 %Z) {
|
define i1 @PR32949(i32 %X, i32 %Y, i32 %Z) {
|
||||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @PR32949(
|
; CHECK-LABEL: @PR32949(
|
||||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = icmp sgt i32 %X, %Y
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[A:%.*]] = sdiv exact i32 %X, %Z
|
||||||
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[B:%.*]] = sdiv exact i32 %Y, %Z
|
||||||
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = icmp sgt i32 [[A]], [[B]]
|
||||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[C]]
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[C]]
|
||||||
;
|
;
|
||||||
%A = sdiv exact i32 %X, %Z
|
%A = sdiv exact i32 %X, %Z
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue