From 8659651a12c30e5ce7a66b44b80562ad0919a599 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 05:44:37 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] link to c++ status page

llvm-svn: 55277
---
 clang/www/comparison.html | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/clang/www/comparison.html b/clang/www/comparison.html
index e5ed8e43a929..5eca9e5283ce 100644
--- a/clang/www/comparison.html
+++ b/clang/www/comparison.html
@@ -51,8 +51,8 @@
     <li>GCC supports languages that clang does not aim to, such as Java, Ada,
         FORTRAN, etc.</li>
     <li>GCC front-ends are very mature and already support C/C++/ObjC and all
-        the variants we are interested in.  clang's support for C++ in
-        particular is nowhere near what GCC supports.</li>
+        the variants we are interested in.  <a href="cxx_status.html">clang's 
+        support for C++</a> in particular is nowhere near what GCC supports.</li>
     <li>GCC's codegen is much more mature than clang's right now and supports 
         more targets than LLVM.</li>
     <li>GCC is popular and widely adopted.</li>