Migrate most of the rest of test/FrontendC from llvm and migrate

most of them to FileCheck.

llvm-svn: 136159

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-01-23-LoadQISIReloadFailure.c

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+/* Regression test.  Just compile .c -> .ll to test */
+int foo(void) {
+  unsigned char *pp;
+  unsigned w_cnt;
+
+  w_cnt += *pp;
+
+  return w_cnt;
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-01-24-ComplexSpaceInType.c

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+// This caused generation of the following type name:
+//   %Array = uninitialized global [10 x %complex int]
+//
+// which caused problems because of the space int the complex int type
+//
+
+struct { int X, Y; } Array[10];
+
+void foo() {}

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-01-24-HandleCallInsnSEGV.c

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+void *dlclose(void*);
+
+void ap_os_dso_unload(void *handle)
+{
+    dlclose(handle);
+    return;     /* This return triggers the bug: Weird */
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-02-13-ConditionalInCall.c

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+/* Test problem where bad code was generated with a ?: statement was 
+   in a function call argument */
+
+void foo(int, double, float);
+
+void bar(int x) {
+  foo(x, x ? 1.0 : 12.5, 1.0f);
+}
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-02-13-ReloadProblem.c

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+/* This triggered a problem in reload, fixed by disabling most of the 
+ * steps of compilation in GCC.  Before this change, the code went through
+ * the entire backend of GCC, even though it was unnecessary for LLVM output
+ * now it is skipped entirely, and since reload doesn't run, it can't cause
+ * a problem.
+ */
+
+extern int tolower(int);
+
+const char *rangematch(const char *pattern, int test, int c) {
+
+  if ((c <= test) | (tolower(c) <= tolower((unsigned char)test)))
+    return 0;
+
+  return pattern;
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-02-13-TypeVarNameCollision.c

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+/* This testcase causes a symbol table collision.  Type names and variable
+ * names should be in distinct namespaces
+ */
+
+typedef struct foo {
+  int X, Y;
+} FOO;
+
+static FOO foo[100];
+
+int test() {
+  return foo[4].Y;
+}
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-02-13-UnnamedLocal.c

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+/* Testcase for a problem where GCC allocated xqic to a register,
+ * and did not have a VAR_DECL that explained the stack slot to LLVM.
+ * Now the LLVM code synthesizes a stack slot if one is presented that
+ * has not been previously recognized.  This is where alloca's named 
+ * 'local' come from now. 
+ */
+
+typedef struct {
+  short x;
+} foostruct;
+
+int foo(foostruct ic);
+
+void test() {
+  foostruct xqic;
+  foo(xqic);
+}
+
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-02-14-EntryNodePreds.c

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+/* GCC Used to generate code that contained a branch to the entry node of 
+ * the do_merge function.  This is illegal LLVM code.  To fix this, GCC now
+ * inserts an entry node regardless of whether or not it has to insert allocas.
+ */
+
+struct edge_rec
+{
+  struct VERTEX *v;
+  struct edge_rec *next;
+  int wasseen;
+  int more_data;
+};
+
+typedef struct edge_rec *QUAD_EDGE;
+
+typedef struct {
+  QUAD_EDGE left, right;
+} EDGE_PAIR;
+
+struct EDGE_STACK {
+    int ptr;
+    QUAD_EDGE *elts;
+    int stack_size;
+};
+
+int do_merge(QUAD_EDGE ldo, QUAD_EDGE rdo) {
+  int lvalid;
+  QUAD_EDGE basel,rcand;
+  while (1) {
+    if (!lvalid) {
+      return (int)basel->next;
+    }
+  }
+}
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-02-16-RenamingTest.c

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+/* test that locals are renamed with . notation */
+
+void abc(void *);
+
+void Test5(double X) {
+  abc(&X);
+  {
+    int X;
+    abc(&X);
+    {
+      float X;
+      abc(&X);
+    }
+  }
+}
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-02-17-ArgumentAddress.c

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+int test(int X) {
+  return X;
+}
+
+void abc(int *X);
+int def(int Y, int Z) {
+  abc(&Z);
+  return Y;
+}
+
+struct Test { short X, x; int Y, Z; };
+
+int Testing(struct Test *A) {
+  return A->X+A->Y;
+}
+
+int Test2(int X, struct Test A, int Y) {
+  return X+Y+A.X+A.Y;
+}
+int Test3(struct Test A, struct Test B) {
+  return A.X+A.Y+B.Y+B.Z;
+}
+
+struct Test Test4(struct Test A) {
+  return A;
+}
+
+int Test6() {
+  int B[200];
+  return B[4];
+}
+
+struct STest2 { int X; short Y[4]; double Z; };
+
+struct STest2 Test7(struct STest2 X) {
+  return X;
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-02-18-StaticData.c

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+
+double FOO = 17;
+double BAR = 12.0;
+float XX = 12.0f;
+
+static char *procnames[] = {
+  "EXIT"
+};
+
+void *Data[] = { &FOO, &BAR, &XX };
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-03-12-ArrayInitialization.c

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+/* GCC would generate bad code if not enough initializers are 
+   specified for an array.
+ */
+
+int a[10] = { 0, 2};
+
+char str[10] = "x";
+
+void *Arr[5] = { 0, 0 };
+
+float F[12] = { 1.23f, 34.7f };
+
+struct Test { int X; double Y; };
+
+struct Test Array[10] = { { 2, 12.0 }, { 3, 24.0 } };
+
+int B[4][4] = { { 1, 2, 3, 4}, { 5, 6, 7 }, { 8, 9 } };

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-03-12-StructInitialize.c

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+
+typedef struct Connection_Type {
+   long    to;
+   char    type[10];
+   long    length;
+} Connection;
+
+Connection link[3]
+= { {1, "link1", 10},
+    {2, "link2", 20},
+    {3, "link3", 30} };
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-03-12-StructInitializer.c

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+/* GCC was not emitting string constants of the correct length when
+ * embedded into a structure field like this.  It thought the strlength
+ * was -1.
+ */
+
+typedef struct Connection_Type {
+   long    to;
+   char    type[10];
+   long    length;
+} Connection;
+
+Connection link[3]
+= { {1, "link1", 10},
+    {2, "link2", 20},
+    {3, "link3", 30} };
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-03-14-BrokenPHINode.c

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+/* GCC was generating PHI nodes with an arity < #pred of the basic block the
+ * PHI node lived in.  This was breaking LLVM because the number of entries
+ * in a PHI node must equal the number of predecessors for a basic block.
+ */
+
+int trys(char *s, int x)
+{
+  int asa;
+  double Val;
+  int LLS;
+  if (x) {
+    asa = LLS + asa;
+  } else {
+  }
+  return asa+(int)Val;
+}
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-03-14-BrokenSSA.c

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+/* This code used to break GCC's SSA computation code.  It would create
+   uses of B & C that are not dominated by their definitions.  See:
+   http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-03/msg00697.html
+ */
+int bar();
+int foo()
+{
+  int a,b,c;
+
+  a = b + c;
+  b = bar();
+  c = bar();
+  return a + b + c;
+}
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-03-14-QuotesInStrConst.c

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+/* GCC was not escaping quotes in string constants correctly, so this would
+ * get emitted:
+ *  %.LC1 = internal global [32 x sbyte] c"*** Word "%s" on line %d is not\00"
+ */
+
+const char *Foo() {
+  return "*** Word \"%s\" on line %d is not";
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-04-07-SwitchStmt.c

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+int printf(const char *, ...);
+int foo();
+
+int main() {
+  while (foo()) {
+     switch (foo()) {
+     case 0:
+     case 1:
+     case 2:
+     case 3:
+       printf("3");
+     case 4: printf("4");
+     case 5:
+     case 6:
+     default:
+       break;
+     }
+   }
+   return 0;
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-04-08-LocalArray.c

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+/* GCC is not outputting the static array to the LLVM backend, so bad things
+ * happen.  Note that if this is defined static, everything seems fine.
+ */
+double test(unsigned X) {
+  double student_t[30]={0.0 , 12.706 , 4.303 , 3.182 , 2.776 , 2.571 ,
+                               2.447 , 2.365 , 2.306 , 2.262 , 2.228 ,
+                               2.201 , 2.179 , 2.160 , 2.145 , 2.131 ,
+                               2.120 , 2.110 , 2.101 , 2.093 , 2.086 ,
+                               2.080 , 2.074 , 2.069 , 2.064 , 2.060 ,
+                               2.056 , 2.052 , 2.048 , 2.045 };
+  return student_t[X];
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-04-09-StructRetVal.c

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+struct S {
+  int i;
+  short s1, s2;
+};
+
+struct S func_returning_struct(void);
+
+void loop(void) {
+  func_returning_struct();
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-04-10-StructParameters.c

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+
+typedef struct {
+  char p;
+  short q;
+  char r;
+  int X;
+  short Y, Z;
+  int Q;
+} foo;
+
+int test(foo X, float);
+int testE(char,short,char,int,int,float);
+void test3(foo *X) {
+  X->q = 1;
+}
+
+void test2(foo Y) {
+  testE(Y.p, Y.q, Y.r, Y.X, Y.Y, 0.1f);
+  test(Y, 0.1f);
+  test2(Y);
+  test3(&Y);
+}
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-05-23-StaticValues.c

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+/* Make sure the frontend is correctly marking static stuff as internal! */
+
+int X;
+static int Y = 12;
+
+static void foo(int Z) {
+  Y = Z;
+}
+
+void *test() {
+  foo(12);
+  return &Y;
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-05-23-TypeNameCollision.c

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+/* Testcase for when struct tag conflicts with typedef name... grr */
+
+typedef struct foo {
+  struct foo *X;
+  int Y;
+} * foo;
+
+foo F1;
+struct foo *F2;
+
+enum bar { test1, test2 };
+
+typedef float bar;
+
+enum bar B1;
+bar B2;
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-07-14-MiscListTests.c

@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+// Test list stuff
+
+void *malloc(unsigned);
+
+// Test opaque structure support.  the list type is defined later
+struct list;
+
+struct list *PassThroughList(struct list *L) {
+  return L;
+}
+
+
+// Recursive data structure tests...
+
+typedef struct list {
+  int Data;
+  struct list *Next;
+} list;
+
+list *Data;
+
+void foo() {
+  static int Foo = 0;            // Test static local variable
+  Foo += 1;                      // Increment static variable
+
+  Data = (list*)malloc(12);      // This is not a proper list allocation
+}
+
+extern list ListNode1;
+list ListNode3 = { 4, 0          };
+list ListNode2 = { 3, &ListNode3 };
+list ListNode0 = { 1, &ListNode1 };
+list ListNode1 = { 2, &ListNode2 };
+
+
+list ListArray[10];
+
+// Iterative insert fn
+void InsertIntoListTail(list **L, int Data) {
+  while (*L)
+    L = &(*L)->Next;
+  *L = (list*)malloc(sizeof(list));
+  (*L)->Data = Data;
+  (*L)->Next = 0;
+}
+
+// Recursive list search fn
+list *FindData(list *L, int Data) {
+  if (L == 0) return 0;
+  if (L->Data == Data) return L;
+  return FindData(L->Next, Data);
+}
+
+void foundIt(void);
+
+// Driver fn...
+void DoListStuff() {
+  list *MyList = 0;
+  InsertIntoListTail(&MyList, 100);
+  InsertIntoListTail(&MyList, 12);
+  InsertIntoListTail(&MyList, 42);
+  InsertIntoListTail(&MyList, 1123);
+  InsertIntoListTail(&MyList, 1213);
+
+  if (FindData(MyList, 75)) foundIt();
+  if (FindData(MyList, 42)) foundIt();
+  if (FindData(MyList, 700)) foundIt();
+}
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-07-14-MiscTests.c

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -w -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+/* These are random tests that I used when working on the GCC frontend 
+   originally. */
+
+// test floating point comparison!
+int floatcomptest(double *X, double *Y, float *x, float *y) {
+  return *X < *Y || *x < *y;
+}
+
+extern void *malloc(unsigned);
+
+// Exposed a bug
+void *memset_impl(void *dstpp, int c, unsigned len) {
+  long long int dstp = (long long int) dstpp;
+
+  while (dstp % 4 != 0)
+    {
+      ((unsigned char *) dstp)[0] = c;
+      dstp += 1;
+      len -= 1;
+    }
+  return dstpp;
+}
+
+// TEST problem with signed/unsigned versions of the same constants being shared
+// incorrectly!
+//
+static char *temp;
+static int remaining;
+static char *localmalloc(int size) {
+  char *blah;
+  
+  if (size>remaining) 
+    {
+      temp = (char *) malloc(32768);
+      remaining = 32768;
+      return temp;
+    }
+  return 0;
+}
+
+typedef struct { double X; double Y; int Z; } PBVTest;
+
+PBVTest testRetStruct(float X, double Y, int Z) {
+  PBVTest T = { X, Y, Z };
+  return T;
+}
+PBVTest testRetStruct2(void);  // external func no inlining
+
+
+double CallRetStruct(float X, double Y, int Z) {
+  PBVTest T = testRetStruct2();
+  return T.X+X+Y+Z;
+}
+
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-07-14-MiscTests2.c

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+
+// Test ?: in function calls
+extern fp(int, char*);
+char *Ext;
+void
+__bb_exit_func (void)
+{
+  fp (12, Ext ? Ext : "<none>");
+}
+
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-07-16-HardStringInit.c

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+  char      auto_kibitz_list[100][20] = {
+                                      {"diepx"},
+                                      {"ferret"},
+                                      {"knightc"},
+                                      {"knightcap"}};
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-07-17-StringConstant.c

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+
+char * foo() { return "\\begin{"; }

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-07-30-SubregSetAssertion.c

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+
+union X {
+  void *B;
+};
+
+union X foo() {
+  union X A;
+  A.B = (void*)123;
+  return A;
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-07-30-UnionTest.c

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+union X;
+struct Empty {};
+union F {};
+union Q { union Q *X; };
+union X {
+  char C;
+  int A, Z;
+  long long B;
+  void *b1;
+  struct { int A; long long Z; } Q;
+};
+
+union X foo(union X A) {
+  A.C = 123;
+  A.A = 39249;
+  //A.B = (void*)123040123321;
+  A.B = 12301230123123LL;
+  A.Z = 1;
+  return A;
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-07-30-VarArgsCallFailure.c

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+int tcount;
+void test(char *, const char*, int);
+void foo() {
+  char Buf[10];
+  test(Buf, "n%%%d", tcount++);
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-07-31-BadAssert.c

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+typedef struct
+{
+        unsigned char type;        /* Indicates, NORMAL, SUBNORMAL, etc. */
+} InternalFPF;
+
+
+static void SetInternalFPFZero(InternalFPF *dest) {
+  dest->type=0;
+}
+
+void denormalize(InternalFPF *ptr) {
+   SetInternalFPFZero(ptr);
+}
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-07-31-SubregFailure.c

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+
+typedef union {
+   long (*ap)[4];
+} ptrs;
+
+void DoAssignIteration() {
+  ptrs abase;
+  abase.ap+=27;
+  Assignment(*abase.ap);
+}
+
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-08-19-RecursiveLocals.c

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+/* This testcase doesn't actually test a bug, it's just the result of me 
+ * figuring out the syntax for forward declaring a static variable. */
+struct list {
+  int x;
+  struct list *Next;
+};
+
+static struct list B;  /* Forward declare static */
+static struct list A = { 7, &B };
+static struct list B = { 8, &A };
+
+extern struct list D;  /* forward declare normal var */
+
+struct list C = { 7, &D };
+struct list D = { 8, &C };
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-09-08-PointerShifts.c

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+
+int foo(int *A, unsigned X) {
+  return A[X];
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-09-18-UnionProblem.c

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+
+struct DWstruct {
+  char high, low;
+};
+
+typedef union {
+  struct DWstruct s;
+  short ll;
+} DWunion;
+
+short __udivmodhi4 (char n1, char bm) {
+  DWunion rr;
+
+  if (bm == 0)
+    {
+      rr.s.high = n1;
+    }
+  else
+    {
+      rr.s.high = bm;
+    }
+
+  return rr.ll;
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-10-12-TooManyArguments.c

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+
+void foo() {}
+
+void bar() {
+  foo(1, 2, 3);  /* Too many arguments passed */
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-12-15-GlobalBoolTest.c

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+
+_Bool X = 0;
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-12-15-GlobalConstantTest.c

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+
+const char *W = "foo";
+const int X = 7;
+int Y = 8;
+const char * const Z = "bar";
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-12-15-GlobalRedefinition.c

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+extern char algbrfile[9];
+char algbrfile[9] = "abcdefgh";
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2002-12-15-StructParameters.c

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+typedef struct
+{
+  void *stack;
+  unsigned size;
+  unsigned avail;
+} compile_stack_type;
+
+void foo(void*);
+void bar(compile_stack_type T, unsigned);
+
+void test() {
+  compile_stack_type CST;
+  foo(&CST);
+
+  bar(CST, 12);
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-01-30-UnionInit.c

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s -o /dev/null
+
+union foo {
+  struct { char A, B; } X;
+  int C;
+};
+
+union foo V = { {1, 2} };

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-03-03-DeferredType.c

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+
+
+
+struct foo A;
+
+struct foo {
+  int x;
+double D;
+};
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-06-22-UnionCrash.c

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+struct Blend_Map_Entry {
+  union {
+   float Colour[5];
+   double Point_Slope[2];
+  } Vals;
+};
+
+void test(struct Blend_Map_Entry* Foo)
+{
+}
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-06-23-GCC-fold-infinite-recursion.c

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+double Test(double A, double B, double C, double D) {
+  return -(A-B) - (C-D);
+}
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-06-26-CFECrash.c

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+typedef struct min_info {
+  long offset;
+  unsigned file_attr;
+} min_info;
+
+typedef struct Globals {
+  char answerbuf;
+  min_info info[1];
+  min_info *pInfo;
+} Uz_Globs;
+
+extern Uz_Globs G;
+
+int extract_or_test_files() {  
+  G.pInfo = G.info;
+}
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-06-29-MultipleFunctionDefinition.c

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=gnu89 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+/* This is apparently legal C.
+ */
+extern __inline__ void test() { }
+
+void test() {
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-07-22-ArrayAccessTypeSafety.c

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+/* RUN: %clang_cc1  %s -emit-llvm -o - | grep -v alloca | not grep bitcast
+ */
+
+void test(int* array, long long N) {
+    array[N] = N[array] = 33;
+}
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-08-06-BuiltinSetjmpLongjmp.c

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/* RUN: %clang_cc1  %s -emit-llvm -o - | not grep __builtin_
+ *
+ * __builtin_longjmp/setjmp should get transformed into llvm.setjmp/longjmp 
+ * just like explicit setjmp/longjmp calls are.
+ */
+
+void jumpaway(int *ptr) {
+  __builtin_longjmp(ptr,1);
+}
+    
+int main(void) {
+  __builtin_setjmp(0);
+  jumpaway(0);
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-08-17-DeadCodeShortCircuit.c

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c %s -emit-llvm -o /dev/null
+
+int test(_Bool pos, _Bool color) {
+  return 0;
+  return (pos && color);
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-08-18-StructAsValue.c

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+
+typedef struct {
+  int op;
+} event_t;
+
+event_t test(int X) {
+  event_t foo = { 1 }, bar = { 2 };
+  return X ? foo : bar;
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-08-20-BadBitfieldRef.c

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+void foo()
+{
+  char *ap;
+  ap[1] == '-' && ap[2] == 0;
+}
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-08-20-PrototypeMismatch.c

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+
+
+static int foo(int);
+
+static int foo(C)
+char C;
+{
+  return C;
+}
+
+void test() {
+  foo(7);
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-08-20-vfork-bug.c

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+extern int vfork(void);
+test() {
+  vfork();
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-08-21-BinOp-Type-Mismatch.c

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+struct bar;
+
+void foo()
+{
+  unsigned int frame, focus;
+  (struct bar *) focus == (focus ? ((struct bar *) frame) : 0);
+}
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-08-21-StmtExpr.c

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+
+typedef struct {
+  unsigned long val;
+} structty;
+
+void bar(structty new_mask);
+static void foo() {
+  bar(({ structty mask; mask; }));
+}
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-08-23-LocalUnionTest.c

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+
+
+union foo { int X; };
+
+int test(union foo* F) {
+  {
+    union foo { float X; } A;
+  }
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-08-29-BitFieldStruct.c

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+struct Word {
+  short bar;
+  short baz;
+  int final:1;
+  short quux;
+} *word_limit;
+
+void foo ()
+{
+  word_limit->final = (word_limit->final && word_limit->final);
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-08-29-HugeCharConst.c

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+void foo() {
+  unsigned char int_latin1[] = "f\200\372b\200\343\200\340";
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-08-30-AggregateInitializer.c

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s -o /dev/null
+
+struct istruct {
+  unsigned char C;
+};
+
+struct foo {
+  unsigned int I:1;
+  struct istruct J;
+  unsigned char L[1];
+  unsigned int K:1;
+};
+
+struct foo F = { 1, { 7 }, { 123 } , 1 };
+
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-09-30-StructLayout.c

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+enum En {
+  ENUM_VAL
+};
+
+struct St {
+  unsigned char A;
+  enum En B;
+  unsigned char C;
+  enum En D;
+  float E;
+};
+
+
+void func(struct St* A) {
+  A->D = ENUM_VAL;
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-10-09-UnionInitializerBug.c

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+struct Foo {
+    unsigned a;
+    unsigned b;
+    unsigned c;
+};
+
+struct Bar {
+    union {
+        void **a;
+        struct Foo b;
+    }u;
+};
+
+struct Bar test = {0};
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-10-28-ident.c

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+
+#ident "foo"

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-10-29-AsmRename.c

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+
+struct foo { int X; };
+struct bar { int Y; };
+
+extern int Func(struct foo*) __asm__("Func64");
+extern int Func64(struct bar*);
+
+int Func(struct foo *F) {
+  return 1;
+}
+
+int Func64(struct bar* B) {
+  return 0;
+}
+
+
+int test() {
+  Func(0);    /* should be renamed to call Func64 */
+  Func64(0);
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-11-01-C99-CompoundLiteral.c

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+typedef struct { int foo; } spinlock_t;
+typedef struct wait_queue_head_t { spinlock_t lock; } wait_queue_head_t;
+void call_usermodehelper(void) { 
+  struct wait_queue_head_t work = { lock: (spinlock_t) { 0 }, }; 
+}
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-11-01-EmptyStructCrash.c

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+typedef struct { } the_coolest_struct_in_the_world;
+extern the_coolest_struct_in_the_world xyzzy;
+void *foo() { return &xyzzy; }
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-11-01-GlobalUnionInit.c

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+union bdflush_param {
+    struct { int x; } b_un;
+    int y[1];
+} bdf_prm = {{30}};
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-11-03-AddrArrayElement.c

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+// This should be turned into a tasty getelementptr instruction, not a nasty
+// series of casts and address arithmetic.
+
+char Global[100];
+
+char *test1(unsigned i) {
+  // CHECK: getelementptr
+  return &Global[i];
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-11-04-EmptyStruct.c

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+typedef struct { } rwlock_t;
+struct fs_struct { rwlock_t lock; int umask; };
+void __copy_fs_struct(struct fs_struct *fs) { fs->lock = (rwlock_t) { }; }
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-11-04-OutOfMemory.c

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+void schedule_timeout(signed long timeout)
+{
+ switch (timeout)
+ {
+ case ((long)(~0UL>>1)): break;
+ }
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-11-08-PointerSubNotGetelementptr.c

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+char *test(char* C) {
+  // CHECK: getelementptr
+  return C-1;   // Should turn into a GEP
+}
+
+int *test2(int* I) {
+  return I-1;
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-11-12-VoidString.c

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+void query_newnamebuf(void) { ((void)"query_newnamebuf"); }
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-11-18-CondExprLValue.c

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+typedef struct { unsigned long pgprot; } pgprot_t;
+
+void split_large_page(unsigned long addr, pgprot_t prot)
+{
+  (addr ? prot : ((pgprot_t) { 0x001 } )).pgprot;
+}
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-11-19-AddressOfRegister.c

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o /dev/null
+
+struct item {
+  short delta[4];
+};
+
+int TEST(int nt) {
+ register struct item *aa;
+ aa[nt].delta;
+ return 1;
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-11-19-BitFieldArray.c

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+struct _GIOChannel {
+  int write_buf;
+  char partial_write_buf[6];
+  int d :1;
+};
+
+void g_io_channel_init (struct _GIOChannel *channel) {
+  channel->partial_write_buf[0];
+}
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-11-20-Bitfields.c

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+struct face_cachel {
+  unsigned int reverse :1;
+  unsigned char font_specified[1];
+};
+
+void
+ensure_face_cachel_contains_charset (struct face_cachel *cachel) {
+  cachel->font_specified[0] = 0;
+}
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-11-20-ComplexDivision.c

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+int test() {
+  __complex__ double C;
+  double D;
+  C / D;
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-11-20-UnionBitfield.c

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+struct printf_spec {
+  unsigned int minus_flag:1;
+  char converter;
+};
+
+void parse_doprnt_spec () {
+  struct printf_spec spec;
+  spec.minus_flag = 1;
+}
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-11-26-PointerShift.c

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+unsigned long do_csum(const unsigned char *buff, int len, unsigned long result) {
+  if (2 & (unsigned long) buff) result += 1;
+  return result;
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-11-27-ConstructorCast.c

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+struct i387_soft_struct {
+  long cwd;
+};
+union i387_union {
+  struct i387_soft_struct soft;
+};
+struct thread_struct {
+  union i387_union i387;
+};
+void _init_task_union(void) {
+   struct thread_struct thread = (struct thread_struct) { {{0}} };
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-11-27-UnionCtorInitialization.c

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+struct i387_soft_struct {
+ long cwd;
+ long twd;
+ long fip;
+};
+union i387_union {
+ struct i387_soft_struct soft;
+};
+struct thread_struct {
+ union i387_union i387;
+};
+void _init_task_union(void) {
+  struct thread_struct thread = (struct thread_struct) { {{0}} };
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2003-12-14-ExternInlineSupport.c

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=gnu89 %s -emit-llvm -o - | not grep dead_function
+
+extern __inline__ void dead_function() {}

clang/test/CodeGen/2004-01-01-UnknownInitSize.c

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s -o /dev/null
+
+/*
+ * This regression test ensures that the C front end can compile initializers
+ * even when it cannot determine the size (as below).
+*/
+struct one
+{
+  int a;
+  int values [];
+};
+
+struct one hobbit = {5, {1, 2, 3}};
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2004-02-12-LargeAggregateCopy.c

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1  %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+struct X { int V[10000]; };
+struct X Global1, Global2;
+void test() {
+  // CHECK: llvm.memcpy
+  Global2 = Global1;
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2004-02-13-BuiltinFrameReturnAddress.c

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1  %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+void *test1() {
+  // CHECK: call i8* @llvm.returnaddress
+  return __builtin_return_address(1);
+}
+void *test2() {
+  // CHECK: call i8* @llvm.frameaddress
+  return __builtin_frame_address(0);
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2004-02-13-Memset.c

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1  %s -emit-llvm -o - | grep llvm.memset | count 3
+
+void *memset(void*, int, unsigned long);
+void bzero(void*, unsigned long);
+
+void test(int* X, char *Y) {
+  // CHECK: call i8* llvm.memset
+  memset(X, 4, 1000);
+  // CHECK: call void bzero
+  bzero(Y, 100);
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2004-02-14-ZeroInitializer.c

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1  %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+// CHECK: zeroinitializer
+int X[1000];

clang/test/CodeGen/2004-03-07-ComplexDivEquals.c

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+
+void test(__complex__ double D, double X) {
+  D /= X;
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2004-03-07-ExternalConstant.c

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1  %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+// CHECK: @a = external constan
+extern const int a[];   // 'a' should be marked constant even though it's external!
+int foo () {
+  return a[0];
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2004-03-09-LargeArrayInitializers.c

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+// Test that these initializers are handled efficiently
+
+int test(int x) {
+  const int XX[1000] = { 0, 0 };
+  const char S [1000] = "foo";
+
+  const int array[] = {
+     17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 
+     17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 
+     17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 
+     17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 
+     17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 
+     17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 
+     17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 
+     17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 
+     17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 
+     17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 
+     17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 
+     17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 
+     17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 
+     17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 
+     17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 
+     17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 
+     17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 
+     17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 
+     17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 
+     17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 17, 23, 123, 123, 49, 
+   };
+   return array[x];
+} 

clang/test/CodeGen/2004-03-16-AsmRegisterCrash.c

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+int foo() {
+#ifdef __ppc__
+  register int X __asm__("r1");
+#else
+  register int X __asm__("ebx");
+#endif
+  return X;
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2004-05-07-VarArrays.c

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+int foo(int len, char arr[][len], int X) {
+  return arr[X][0];
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2004-05-21-IncompleteEnum.c

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -w -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+void test(enum foo *X) {
+}
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2004-06-08-OpaqueStructArg.c

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+   struct fu;
+   void foo(struct fu);
+   void bar() {
+      foo;
+   }

clang/test/CodeGen/2004-06-17-UnorderedBuiltins.c

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+
+_Bool A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H;
+void TestF(float X, float Y) {
+  A = __builtin_isgreater(X, Y);
+  B = __builtin_isgreaterequal(X, Y);
+  C = __builtin_isless(X, Y);
+  D = __builtin_islessequal(X, Y);
+  E = __builtin_islessgreater(X, Y);
+  F = __builtin_isunordered(X, Y);
+  //G = __builtin_isordered(X, Y);    // Our current snapshot of GCC doesn't include this builtin
+  H = __builtin_isunordered(X, Y);
+}
+void TestD(double X, double Y) {
+  A = __builtin_isgreater(X, Y);
+  B = __builtin_isgreaterequal(X, Y);
+  C = __builtin_isless(X, Y);
+  D = __builtin_islessequal(X, Y);
+  E = __builtin_islessgreater(X, Y);
+  F = __builtin_isunordered(X, Y);
+  //G = __builtin_isordered(X, Y);    // Our current snapshot doesn't include this builtin.  FIXME
+  H = __builtin_isunordered(X, Y);
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2004-06-18-VariableLengthArrayOfStructures.c

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+
+struct S { };
+
+int xxxx(int a) {
+  struct S comps[a];
+  comps[0];
+}
+

clang/test/CodeGen/2004-07-06-FunctionCast.c

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+static int unused_func(void) {
+  return 1;
+}
+
+int foo(void) {
+  (void)unused_func; /* avoid compiler warning */
+  return 2;
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2004-08-06-LargeStructTest.c

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s  -o /dev/null
+
+
+#define A(X) int X;
+#define B(X) A(X##0) A(X##1) A(X##2) A(X##3) A(X##4) A(X##5) A(X##6) A(X##7) \
+             A(X##8) A(X##9) A(X##A) A(X##B) A(X##C) A(X##D) A(X##E) A(X##F)
+#define C(X) B(X##0) B(X##1) B(X##2) B(X##3) B(X##4) B(X##5) B(X##6) B(X##7) \
+             B(X##8) B(X##9) B(X##A) B(X##B) B(X##C) B(X##D) B(X##E) B(X##F)
+
+struct foo {
+  C(x);   // 256
+  C(y);   // 256
+  C(z);
+};
+
+
+int test(struct foo *F) {
+   return F->xA1 + F->yFF + F->zC4;
+}

clang/test/CodeGen/2004-11-25-UnnamedBitfieldPadding.c

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s -o /dev/null
+// This is a testcase for PR461
+typedef struct {
+  unsigned min_align: 1;
+  unsigned : 1;
+} addr_diff_vec_flags;
+
+addr_diff_vec_flags X;

clang/test/CodeGen/2004-11-27-StaticFunctionRedeclare.c

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s -o - | \
+// RUN:   opt -std-compile-opts -emit-llvm | not grep {declare i32.*func}
+
+// There should not be an unresolved reference to func here.  Believe it or not,
+// the "expected result" is a function named 'func' which is internal and 
+// referenced by bar().
+
+// This is PR244
+
+static int func();
+void bar() {
+  int func();
+  foo(func);
+}
+static int func(char** A, char ** B) {}