forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[LoopDeletion] Exploit undef Phi inputs when symbolically executing 1st iteration
Follow-up on Roman's idea expressed in D103959. - If a Phi has undefined inputs from live blocks: - and no other inputs, assume it is undef itself; - and exactly one non-undef input, we can assume that all undefs are equal to this input. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104618 Reviewed By: lebedev.ri, nikic
This commit is contained in:
parent
f681fd927e
commit
842b4c83cb
|
@ -251,20 +251,28 @@ static bool canProveExitOnFirstIteration(Loop *L, DominatorTree &DT,
|
|||
// (non-latch) predecessors.
|
||||
auto GetSoleInputOnFirstIteration = [&](PHINode & PN)->Value * {
|
||||
BasicBlock *BB = PN.getParent();
|
||||
bool HasLivePreds = false;
|
||||
(void)HasLivePreds;
|
||||
if (BB == Header)
|
||||
return PN.getIncomingValueForBlock(Predecessor);
|
||||
Value *OnlyInput = nullptr;
|
||||
for (auto *Pred : predecessors(BB))
|
||||
if (LiveEdges.count({ Pred, BB })) {
|
||||
HasLivePreds = true;
|
||||
Value *Incoming = PN.getIncomingValueForBlock(Pred);
|
||||
// Skip undefs. If they are present, we can assume they are equal to
|
||||
// the non-undef input.
|
||||
if (isa<UndefValue>(Incoming))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
// Two inputs.
|
||||
if (OnlyInput && OnlyInput != Incoming)
|
||||
return nullptr;
|
||||
OnlyInput = Incoming;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
assert(OnlyInput && "No live predecessors?");
|
||||
return OnlyInput;
|
||||
assert(HasLivePreds && "No live predecessors?");
|
||||
// If all incoming live value were undefs, return undef.
|
||||
return OnlyInput ? OnlyInput : UndefValue::get(PN.getType());
|
||||
};
|
||||
DenseMap<Value *, Value *> FirstIterValue;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -731,20 +731,19 @@ failure:
|
|||
unreachable
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
; TODO: We can break the backedge here by assuming that undef = sub.
|
||||
define i32 @test_multiple_pred_undef_1(i1 %cond, i1 %cond2) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_multiple_pred_undef_1(
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[LOOP:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: loop:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUM:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 0, [[ENTRY:%.*]] ], [ [[SUM_NEXT:%.*]], [[BACKEDGE:%.*]] ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUM:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 0, [[ENTRY:%.*]] ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUB:%.*]] = sub i32 4, [[SUM]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[IS_POSITIVE:%.*]] = icmp sgt i32 [[SUB]], 0
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[IS_POSITIVE]], label [[IF_TRUE:%.*]], label [[IF_FALSE:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: if.true:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[COND:%.*]], label [[IF_TRUE_1:%.*]], label [[IF_TRUE_2:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: if.true.1:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[BACKEDGE]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[BACKEDGE:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: if.true.2:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[BACKEDGE]]
|
||||
; CHECK: if.false:
|
||||
|
@ -755,9 +754,11 @@ define i32 @test_multiple_pred_undef_1(i1 %cond, i1 %cond2) {
|
|||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[BACKEDGE]]
|
||||
; CHECK: backedge:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[MERGE_PHI:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 0, [[IF_FALSE_1]] ], [ 0, [[IF_FALSE_2]] ], [ [[SUB]], [[IF_TRUE_1]] ], [ undef, [[IF_TRUE_2]] ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUM_NEXT]] = add i32 [[SUM]], [[MERGE_PHI]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUM_NEXT:%.*]] = add i32 [[SUM]], [[MERGE_PHI]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[LOOP_COND:%.*]] = icmp ne i32 [[SUM_NEXT]], 4
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[LOOP_COND]], label [[LOOP]], label [[DONE:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[LOOP_COND]], label [[BACKEDGE_LOOP_CRIT_EDGE:%.*]], label [[DONE:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: backedge.loop_crit_edge:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: unreachable
|
||||
; CHECK: done:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUM_NEXT_LCSSA:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[SUM_NEXT]], [[BACKEDGE]] ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[SUM_NEXT_LCSSA]]
|
||||
|
@ -805,20 +806,19 @@ failure:
|
|||
unreachable
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
; TODO: We can break the backedge here by assuming that undef = sub.
|
||||
define i32 @test_multiple_pred_undef_2(i1 %cond, i1 %cond2) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_multiple_pred_undef_2(
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[LOOP:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: loop:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUM:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 0, [[ENTRY:%.*]] ], [ [[SUM_NEXT:%.*]], [[BACKEDGE:%.*]] ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUM:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 0, [[ENTRY:%.*]] ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUB:%.*]] = sub i32 4, [[SUM]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[IS_POSITIVE:%.*]] = icmp sgt i32 [[SUB]], 0
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[IS_POSITIVE]], label [[IF_TRUE:%.*]], label [[IF_FALSE:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: if.true:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[COND:%.*]], label [[IF_TRUE_1:%.*]], label [[IF_TRUE_2:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: if.true.1:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[BACKEDGE]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[BACKEDGE:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: if.true.2:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[BACKEDGE]]
|
||||
; CHECK: if.false:
|
||||
|
@ -829,9 +829,11 @@ define i32 @test_multiple_pred_undef_2(i1 %cond, i1 %cond2) {
|
|||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[BACKEDGE]]
|
||||
; CHECK: backedge:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[MERGE_PHI:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 0, [[IF_FALSE_1]] ], [ 0, [[IF_FALSE_2]] ], [ undef, [[IF_TRUE_1]] ], [ [[SUB]], [[IF_TRUE_2]] ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUM_NEXT]] = add i32 [[SUM]], [[MERGE_PHI]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUM_NEXT:%.*]] = add i32 [[SUM]], [[MERGE_PHI]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[LOOP_COND:%.*]] = icmp ne i32 [[SUM_NEXT]], 4
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[LOOP_COND]], label [[LOOP]], label [[DONE:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[LOOP_COND]], label [[BACKEDGE_LOOP_CRIT_EDGE:%.*]], label [[DONE:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: backedge.loop_crit_edge:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: unreachable
|
||||
; CHECK: done:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUM_NEXT_LCSSA:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[SUM_NEXT]], [[BACKEDGE]] ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[SUM_NEXT_LCSSA]]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue