forked from OSchip/llvm-project
Give the Reassociate pass a bit more flexibility and autonomy when optimizing expressions.
Particularly, it addresses cases where Reassociate breaks Subtracts but then fails to optimize combinations like I1 + -I2 where I1 and I2 have the same rank and are identical. Patch by Dmitri Shtilman. llvm-svn: 219092
This commit is contained in:
parent
2f03c8a38d
commit
8373d338f6
|
@ -1034,13 +1034,23 @@ static unsigned FindInOperandList(SmallVectorImpl<ValueEntry> &Ops, unsigned i,
|
|||
Value *X) {
|
||||
unsigned XRank = Ops[i].Rank;
|
||||
unsigned e = Ops.size();
|
||||
for (unsigned j = i+1; j != e && Ops[j].Rank == XRank; ++j)
|
||||
for (unsigned j = i+1; j != e && Ops[j].Rank == XRank; ++j) {
|
||||
if (Ops[j].Op == X)
|
||||
return j;
|
||||
if (Instruction *I1 = dyn_cast<Instruction>(Ops[j].Op))
|
||||
if (Instruction *I2 = dyn_cast<Instruction>(X))
|
||||
if (I1->isIdenticalTo(I2))
|
||||
return j;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Scan backwards.
|
||||
for (unsigned j = i-1; j != ~0U && Ops[j].Rank == XRank; --j)
|
||||
for (unsigned j = i-1; j != ~0U && Ops[j].Rank == XRank; --j) {
|
||||
if (Ops[j].Op == X)
|
||||
return j;
|
||||
if (Instruction *I1 = dyn_cast<Instruction>(Ops[j].Op))
|
||||
if (Instruction *I2 = dyn_cast<Instruction>(X))
|
||||
if (I1->isIdenticalTo(I2))
|
||||
return j;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return i;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
|
|||
; RUN: opt < %s -reassociate -instcombine -S | FileCheck %s
|
||||
|
||||
; Test that we can turn things like A*B + X - A*B -> X.
|
||||
|
||||
define i32 @test1(i32 %a, i32 %b, i32 %x) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: test1
|
||||
; CHECK: ret i32 %x
|
||||
|
||||
%c = mul i32 %a, %b
|
||||
%d = add i32 %c, %x
|
||||
%c1 = mul i32 %a, %b
|
||||
%f = sub i32 %d, %c1
|
||||
ret i32 %f
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue