Restore test from r211844 skipping '.file' directives

At least this answers the question of whether .bc/.ll input processed by the
frontend produces identical output to the original compilation.

llvm-svn: 211853
This commit is contained in:
Alp Toker 2014-06-27 02:59:39 +00:00
parent 3ef98ff5f9
commit 830c34e269
1 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@ -1,19 +1,19 @@
// Test that we can consume LLVM IR/bitcode in the frontend and produce
// identical output to a standard compilation.
// equivalent output to a standard compilation.
// FIXME: line directives don't match the reference output on ELF so we can't compare.
// We strip differing '.file' directives before comparing.
// Reference output:
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -S -o %t.s %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -S -o - %s | grep -v '\t\.file' > %t.s
// LLVM bitcode:
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm-bc -o %t.bc %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -S -o - %t.bc > %t.bc.s
// RUN-FIXME: diff %t.s %t.bc.s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -S -o - %t.bc | grep -v '\t\.file' > %t.bc.s
// RUN: diff %t.s %t.bc.s
// LLVM IR source code:
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm-bc -o %t.ll %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -S -o - %t.ll > %t.ll.s
// RUN-FIXME: diff %t.s %t.ll.s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm -o %t.ll %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -S -o - %t.ll | grep -v '\t\.file' > %t.ll.s
// RUN: diff %t.s %t.ll.s
int f() { return 0; }