forked from OSchip/llvm-project
Remove some unnecessary unreachables in favor of (sometimes implicit) assertions
Also simplify some else-after-return cases including some standard algorithm convenience/use. llvm-svn: 230094
This commit is contained in:
parent
876e7172ee
commit
82ad78771b
|
@ -2166,6 +2166,8 @@ public:
|
|||
return block_begin() + getNumOperands();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
op_range incoming_values() { return operands(); }
|
||||
|
||||
/// getNumIncomingValues - Return the number of incoming edges
|
||||
///
|
||||
unsigned getNumIncomingValues() const { return getNumOperands(); }
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -150,17 +150,16 @@ static bool isLiveGCReferenceAt(Value &V, Instruction *loc, DominatorTree &DT,
|
|||
static bool isAggWhichContainsGCPtrType(Type *Ty) {
|
||||
if (VectorType *VT = dyn_cast<VectorType>(Ty))
|
||||
return isGCPointerType(VT->getScalarType());
|
||||
else if (ArrayType *AT = dyn_cast<ArrayType>(Ty)) {
|
||||
if (ArrayType *AT = dyn_cast<ArrayType>(Ty))
|
||||
return isGCPointerType(AT->getElementType()) ||
|
||||
isAggWhichContainsGCPtrType(AT->getElementType());
|
||||
} else if (StructType *ST = dyn_cast<StructType>(Ty)) {
|
||||
bool UnsupportedType = false;
|
||||
for (Type *SubType : ST->subtypes())
|
||||
UnsupportedType |=
|
||||
isGCPointerType(SubType) || isAggWhichContainsGCPtrType(SubType);
|
||||
return UnsupportedType;
|
||||
} else
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
if (StructType *ST = dyn_cast<StructType>(Ty))
|
||||
return std::any_of(ST->subtypes().begin(), ST->subtypes().end(),
|
||||
[](Type *SubType) {
|
||||
return isGCPointerType(SubType) ||
|
||||
isAggWhichContainsGCPtrType(SubType);
|
||||
});
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -379,12 +378,9 @@ static Value *findBaseDefiningValue(Value *I) {
|
|||
Value *def = CI->stripPointerCasts();
|
||||
assert(def->getType()->isPointerTy() &&
|
||||
"Base for pointer must be another pointer");
|
||||
if (isa<CastInst>(def)) {
|
||||
// If we find a cast instruction here, it means we've found a cast
|
||||
// which is not simply a pointer cast (i.e. an inttoptr). We don't
|
||||
// know how to handle int->ptr conversion.
|
||||
llvm_unreachable("Can not find the base pointers for an inttoptr cast");
|
||||
}
|
||||
// If we find a cast instruction here, it means we've found a cast which is
|
||||
// not simply a pointer cast (i.e. an inttoptr). We don't know how to
|
||||
// handle int->ptr conversion.
|
||||
assert(!isa<CastInst>(def) && "shouldn't find another cast here");
|
||||
return findBaseDefiningValue(def);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -492,13 +488,8 @@ static Value *findBaseDefiningValue(Value *I) {
|
|||
if (SelectInst *select = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(I)) {
|
||||
return select;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (PHINode *phi = dyn_cast<PHINode>(I)) {
|
||||
return phi;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
errs() << "unknown type: " << *I << "\n";
|
||||
llvm_unreachable("unknown type");
|
||||
return nullptr;
|
||||
return cast<PHINode>(I);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns the base defining value for this value.
|
||||
|
@ -635,18 +626,18 @@ private:
|
|||
|
||||
case PhiState::Base:
|
||||
assert(stateA.getBase() && "can't be null");
|
||||
if (stateB.isUnknown()) {
|
||||
if (stateB.isUnknown())
|
||||
return stateA;
|
||||
} else if (stateB.isBase()) {
|
||||
|
||||
if (stateB.isBase()) {
|
||||
if (stateA.getBase() == stateB.getBase()) {
|
||||
assert(stateA == stateB && "equality broken!");
|
||||
return stateA;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return PhiState(PhiState::Conflict);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
assert(stateB.isConflict() && "only three states!");
|
||||
return PhiState(PhiState::Conflict);
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert(stateB.isConflict() && "only three states!");
|
||||
return PhiState(PhiState::Conflict);
|
||||
|
||||
case PhiState::Conflict:
|
||||
return stateA;
|
||||
|
@ -701,10 +692,9 @@ static Value *findBasePointer(Value *I, DefiningValueMapTy &cache,
|
|||
Value *v = Pair.first;
|
||||
assert(!isKnownBaseResult(v) && "why did it get added?");
|
||||
if (PHINode *phi = dyn_cast<PHINode>(v)) {
|
||||
unsigned NumPHIValues = phi->getNumIncomingValues();
|
||||
assert(NumPHIValues > 0 && "zero input phis are illegal");
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i != NumPHIValues; ++i) {
|
||||
Value *InVal = phi->getIncomingValue(i);
|
||||
assert(phi->getNumIncomingValues() > 0 &&
|
||||
"zero input phis are illegal");
|
||||
for (Value *InVal : phi->incoming_values()) {
|
||||
Value *local = findBaseOrBDV(InVal, cache);
|
||||
if (!isKnownBaseResult(local) && states.find(local) == states.end()) {
|
||||
states[local] = PhiState();
|
||||
|
@ -748,18 +738,12 @@ static Value *findBasePointer(Value *I, DefiningValueMapTy &cache,
|
|||
MeetPhiStates calculateMeet(states);
|
||||
Value *v = Pair.first;
|
||||
assert(!isKnownBaseResult(v) && "why did it get added?");
|
||||
assert(isa<SelectInst>(v) || isa<PHINode>(v));
|
||||
if (SelectInst *select = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(v)) {
|
||||
calculateMeet.meetWith(findBaseOrBDV(select->getTrueValue(), cache));
|
||||
calculateMeet.meetWith(findBaseOrBDV(select->getFalseValue(), cache));
|
||||
} else if (PHINode *phi = dyn_cast<PHINode>(v)) {
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < phi->getNumIncomingValues(); i++) {
|
||||
calculateMeet.meetWith(
|
||||
findBaseOrBDV(phi->getIncomingValue(i), cache));
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
llvm_unreachable("no such state expected");
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else
|
||||
for (Value *Val : cast<PHINode>(v)->incoming_values())
|
||||
calculateMeet.meetWith(findBaseOrBDV(Val, cache));
|
||||
|
||||
PhiState oldState = states[v];
|
||||
PhiState newState = calculateMeet.getResult();
|
||||
|
@ -989,13 +973,13 @@ static void findBasePointers(const StatepointLiveSetTy &live,
|
|||
cast<Instruction>(ptr)->getParent())) &&
|
||||
"The base we found better dominate the derived pointer");
|
||||
|
||||
if (isNullConstant(base))
|
||||
// If you see this trip and like to live really dangerously, the code
|
||||
// should be correct, just with idioms the verifier can't handle. You
|
||||
// can try disabling the verifier at your own substaintial risk.
|
||||
llvm_unreachable("the relocation code needs adjustment to handle the"
|
||||
"relocation of a null pointer constant without causing"
|
||||
"false positives in the safepoint ir verifier.");
|
||||
// If you see this trip and like to live really dangerously, the code should
|
||||
// be correct, just with idioms the verifier can't handle. You can try
|
||||
// disabling the verifier at your own substaintial risk.
|
||||
assert(!isNullConstant(base) && "the relocation code needs adjustment to "
|
||||
"handle the relocation of a null pointer "
|
||||
"constant without causing false positives "
|
||||
"in the safepoint ir verifier.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1258,7 +1242,7 @@ makeStatepointExplicitImpl(const CallSite &CS, /* to replace */
|
|||
Builder.SetInsertPoint(IP);
|
||||
Builder.SetCurrentDebugLocation(IP->getDebugLoc());
|
||||
|
||||
} else if (CS.isInvoke()) {
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
InvokeInst *toReplace = cast<InvokeInst>(CS.getInstruction());
|
||||
|
||||
// Insert the new invoke into the old block. We'll remove the old one in a
|
||||
|
@ -1309,8 +1293,6 @@ makeStatepointExplicitImpl(const CallSite &CS, /* to replace */
|
|||
|
||||
// gc relocates will be generated later as if it were regular call
|
||||
// statepoint
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
llvm_unreachable("unexpect type of CallSite");
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert(token);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1526,12 +1508,11 @@ static void relocationViaAlloca(
|
|||
if (auto II = dyn_cast<InvokeInst>(Statepoint)) {
|
||||
InsertClobbersAt(II->getNormalDest()->getFirstInsertionPt());
|
||||
InsertClobbersAt(II->getUnwindDest()->getFirstInsertionPt());
|
||||
} else if (auto CI = dyn_cast<CallInst>(Statepoint)) {
|
||||
BasicBlock::iterator Next(CI);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
BasicBlock::iterator Next(cast<CallInst>(Statepoint));
|
||||
Next++;
|
||||
InsertClobbersAt(Next);
|
||||
} else
|
||||
llvm_unreachable("illegal statepoint instruction type?");
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
// update use with load allocas and add store for gc_relocated
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue