[InstCombine] Address a couple stylistic issues pointed out by reviewer [NFC]

Better addressing comments from https://reviews.llvm.org/D58290.

llvm-svn: 354171
This commit is contained in:
Philip Reames 2019-02-15 21:31:39 +00:00
parent cae6c767e8
commit 8220ecbce1
1 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -26,8 +26,7 @@ bool isIdempotentRMW(AtomicRMWInst& RMWI) {
// TODO: Handle fadd, fsub?
return false;
AtomicRMWInst::BinOp Op = RMWI.getOperation();
switch(Op) {
switch(RMWI.getOperation()) {
case AtomicRMWInst::Add:
case AtomicRMWInst::Sub:
case AtomicRMWInst::Or:
@ -55,12 +54,12 @@ bool isSaturating(AtomicRMWInst& RMWI) {
if(!C)
return false;
AtomicRMWInst::BinOp Op = RMWI.getOperation();
switch(Op) {
switch(RMWI.getOperation()) {
default:
// TODO: fadd, fsub w/Nan
// Note: We avoid listing xchg to prevent transform cycles.
return false;
case AtomicRMWInst::Xchg:
return true;
case AtomicRMWInst::Or:
return C->isAllOnesValue();
case AtomicRMWInst::And:
@ -87,7 +86,8 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitAtomicRMWInst(AtomicRMWInst &RMWI) {
// Any atomicrmw op which produces a known result in memory can be
// replaced w/an atomicrmw xchg.
if (isSaturating(RMWI)) {
if (isSaturating(RMWI) &&
RMWI.getOperation() != AtomicRMWInst::Xchg) {
RMWI.setOperation(AtomicRMWInst::Xchg);
return &RMWI;
}