forked from OSchip/llvm-project
Fix our handling of visibility in explicit template instantiations.
* Don't copy the visibility attribute during instantiations. We have to be able to distinguish struct HIDDEN foo {}; template<class T> DEFAULT void bar() {} template DEFAULT void bar<foo>(); from struct HIDDEN foo {}; template<class T> DEFAULT void bar() {} template void bar<foo>(); * If an instantiation has an attribute, it takes precedence over an attribute in the template. * With instantiation attributes handled with the above logic, we can now select the minimum visibility when looking at template arguments. llvm-svn: 156821
This commit is contained in:
parent
ab5edc3e89
commit
7f90b7d4c2
|
@ -93,6 +93,9 @@ class Attr {
|
|||
list<string> Namespaces = [];
|
||||
// Set to true for attributes with arguments which require delayed parsing.
|
||||
bit LateParsed = 0;
|
||||
// Set to false to prevent an attribute from being propagated from a template
|
||||
// to the instantiation.
|
||||
bit Clone = 1;
|
||||
// Set to true for attributes which must be instantiated within templates
|
||||
bit TemplateDependent = 0;
|
||||
// Set to true for attributes that have a corresponding AST node.
|
||||
|
@ -660,6 +663,7 @@ def VecTypeHint : Attr {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
def Visibility : InheritableAttr {
|
||||
let Clone = 0;
|
||||
let Spellings = ["visibility"];
|
||||
let Args = [EnumArgument<"Visibility", "VisibilityType",
|
||||
["default", "hidden", "internal", "protected"],
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -158,14 +158,12 @@ getLVForTemplateArgumentList(const TemplateArgumentList &TArgs,
|
|||
return getLVForTemplateArgumentList(TArgs.data(), TArgs.size(), OnlyTemplate);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static bool shouldConsiderTemplateLV(const FunctionDecl *fn,
|
||||
const FunctionTemplateSpecializationInfo *spec) {
|
||||
return !(spec->isExplicitSpecialization() &&
|
||||
fn->hasAttr<VisibilityAttr>());
|
||||
static bool shouldConsiderTemplateLV(const FunctionDecl *fn) {
|
||||
return !fn->hasAttr<VisibilityAttr>();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static bool shouldConsiderTemplateLV(const ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl *d) {
|
||||
return !(d->isExplicitSpecialization() && d->hasAttr<VisibilityAttr>());
|
||||
return !d->hasAttr<VisibilityAttr>();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static LinkageInfo getLVForNamespaceScopeDecl(const NamedDecl *D,
|
||||
|
@ -376,7 +374,7 @@ static LinkageInfo getLVForNamespaceScopeDecl(const NamedDecl *D,
|
|||
// this is an explicit specialization with a visibility attribute.
|
||||
if (FunctionTemplateSpecializationInfo *specInfo
|
||||
= Function->getTemplateSpecializationInfo()) {
|
||||
if (shouldConsiderTemplateLV(Function, specInfo)) {
|
||||
if (shouldConsiderTemplateLV(Function)) {
|
||||
LV.merge(getLVForDecl(specInfo->getTemplate(),
|
||||
true));
|
||||
const TemplateArgumentList &templateArgs = *specInfo->TemplateArguments;
|
||||
|
@ -407,8 +405,8 @@ static LinkageInfo getLVForNamespaceScopeDecl(const NamedDecl *D,
|
|||
|
||||
// The arguments at which the template was instantiated.
|
||||
const TemplateArgumentList &TemplateArgs = spec->getTemplateArgs();
|
||||
LV.merge(getLVForTemplateArgumentList(TemplateArgs,
|
||||
OnlyTemplate));
|
||||
LV.mergeWithMin(getLVForTemplateArgumentList(TemplateArgs,
|
||||
OnlyTemplate));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -527,7 +525,7 @@ static LinkageInfo getLVForClassMember(const NamedDecl *D, bool OnlyTemplate) {
|
|||
// the template parameters and arguments.
|
||||
if (FunctionTemplateSpecializationInfo *spec
|
||||
= MD->getTemplateSpecializationInfo()) {
|
||||
if (shouldConsiderTemplateLV(MD, spec)) {
|
||||
if (shouldConsiderTemplateLV(MD)) {
|
||||
LV.mergeWithMin(getLVForTemplateArgumentList(*spec->TemplateArguments,
|
||||
OnlyTemplate));
|
||||
if (!OnlyTemplate)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -102,7 +102,8 @@ void Sema::InstantiateAttrs(const MultiLevelTemplateArgumentList &TemplateArgs,
|
|||
} else {
|
||||
Attr *NewAttr = sema::instantiateTemplateAttribute(TmplAttr, Context,
|
||||
*this, TemplateArgs);
|
||||
New->addAttr(NewAttr);
|
||||
if (NewAttr)
|
||||
New->addAttr(NewAttr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -712,3 +712,55 @@ namespace test36 {
|
|||
// CHECK: define weak_odr hidden void @_ZN6test363fooINS_2S1ENS_2S2EE3barEv
|
||||
// CHECK-HIDDEN: define weak_odr hidden void @_ZN6test363fooINS_2S1ENS_2S2EE3barEv
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
namespace test37 {
|
||||
struct HIDDEN foo {
|
||||
};
|
||||
template<class T>
|
||||
DEFAULT void bar() {}
|
||||
template DEFAULT void bar<foo>();
|
||||
// CHECK: define weak_odr void @_ZN6test373barINS_3fooEEEvv
|
||||
// CHECK-HIDDEN: define weak_odr void @_ZN6test373barINS_3fooEEEvv
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
namespace test38 {
|
||||
template<typename T>
|
||||
class DEFAULT foo {
|
||||
void bar() {}
|
||||
};
|
||||
struct HIDDEN zed {
|
||||
};
|
||||
template class foo<zed>;
|
||||
// CHECK: define weak_odr hidden void @_ZN6test383fooINS_3zedEE3barEv
|
||||
// CHECK-HIDDEN: define weak_odr hidden void @_ZN6test383fooINS_3zedEE3barEv
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
namespace test39 {
|
||||
class DEFAULT default_t;
|
||||
class HIDDEN hidden_t;
|
||||
template <class T> class A {
|
||||
template <class U> class B {
|
||||
HIDDEN void hidden() {}
|
||||
void noattr() {}
|
||||
template <class V> void temp() {}
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
template class DEFAULT A<hidden_t>;
|
||||
template class DEFAULT A<hidden_t>::B<hidden_t>;
|
||||
template void A<hidden_t>::B<hidden_t>::temp<default_t>();
|
||||
template void A<hidden_t>::B<hidden_t>::temp<hidden_t>();
|
||||
|
||||
// CHECK: define weak_odr hidden void @_ZN6test391AINS_8hidden_tEE1BIS1_E6hiddenEv
|
||||
// CHECK: define weak_odr void @_ZN6test391AINS_8hidden_tEE1BIS1_E6noattrEv
|
||||
// CHECK: define weak_odr void @_ZN6test391AINS_8hidden_tEE1BIS1_E4tempINS_9default_tEEEvv
|
||||
|
||||
// GCC produces a default for this one. Why?
|
||||
// CHECK: define weak_odr hidden void @_ZN6test391AINS_8hidden_tEE1BIS1_E4tempIS1_EEvv
|
||||
|
||||
// CHECK-HIDDEN: define weak_odr hidden void @_ZN6test391AINS_8hidden_tEE1BIS1_E6hiddenEv
|
||||
// CHECK-HIDDEN: define weak_odr void @_ZN6test391AINS_8hidden_tEE1BIS1_E6noattrEv
|
||||
// CHECK-HIDDEN: define weak_odr void @_ZN6test391AINS_8hidden_tEE1BIS1_E4tempINS_9default_tEEEvv
|
||||
|
||||
// GCC produces a default for this one. Why?
|
||||
// CHECK-HIDDEN: define weak_odr hidden void @_ZN6test391AINS_8hidden_tEE1BIS1_E4tempIS1_EEvv
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1004,6 +1004,14 @@ void ClangAttrTemplateInstantiateEmitter::run(raw_ostream &OS) {
|
|||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
OS << " case attr::" << R.getName() << ": {\n";
|
||||
bool ShouldClone = R.getValueAsBit("Clone");
|
||||
|
||||
if (!ShouldClone) {
|
||||
OS << " return NULL;\n";
|
||||
OS << " }\n";
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
OS << " const " << R.getName() << "Attr *A = cast<"
|
||||
<< R.getName() << "Attr>(At);\n";
|
||||
bool TDependent = R.getValueAsBit("TemplateDependent");
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue