r139454 activates an assert in a case where we were doing the right thing anyway. Make that explicit, and un-XFAIL the testcase.

llvm-svn: 139458
This commit is contained in:
Eli Friedman 2011-09-10 02:01:42 +00:00
parent c41773ab6a
commit 7f50e00203
1 changed files with 9 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -4615,8 +4615,16 @@ static SDValue getShuffleScalarElt(SDNode *N, int Index, SelectionDAG &DAG,
DecodeVPERM2F128Mask(VT, cast<ConstantSDNode>(ImmN)->getZExtValue(),
ShuffleMask);
break;
case X86ISD::MOVDDUP:
case X86ISD::MOVLHPD:
case X86ISD::MOVLPD:
case X86ISD::MOVLPS:
case X86ISD::MOVSHDUP:
case X86ISD::MOVSLDUP:
case X86ISD::PALIGN:
return SDValue(); // Not yet implemented.
default:
assert(0 && "not implemented for target shuffle node");
assert(0 && "unknown target shuffle node");
return SDValue();
}