Fix undefined behavior (and wrong code, as far as I can tell) in NEON builtin

tablegen code, found by -fcatch-undefined-behavior. I would appreciate if
someone more familiar with the NEON code could point me in the direction of how
to write a test for this. We appear to have essentially no test coverage
whatsoever for these builtins.

llvm-svn: 161827
This commit is contained in:
Richard Smith 2012-08-14 01:28:02 +00:00
parent 97f6ea9f34
commit 7d6d47b862
2 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ static QualType getNeonEltType(NeonTypeFlags Flags, ASTContext &Context) {
bool Sema::CheckARMBuiltinFunctionCall(unsigned BuiltinID, CallExpr *TheCall) {
llvm::APSInt Result;
unsigned mask = 0;
uint64_t mask = 0;
unsigned TV = 0;
int PtrArgNum = -1;
bool HasConstPtr = false;
@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ bool Sema::CheckARMBuiltinFunctionCall(unsigned BuiltinID, CallExpr *TheCall) {
return true;
TV = Result.getLimitedValue(64);
if ((TV > 63) || (mask & (1 << TV)) == 0)
if ((TV > 63) || (mask & (1ULL << TV)) == 0)
return Diag(TheCall->getLocStart(), diag::err_invalid_neon_type_code)
<< TheCall->getArg(ImmArg)->getSourceRange();
}

View File

@ -1504,7 +1504,7 @@ void NeonEmitter::runHeader(raw_ostream &OS) {
throw TGError(R->getLoc(), "Builtin has no class kind");
int si = -1, qi = -1;
unsigned mask = 0, qmask = 0;
uint64_t mask = 0, qmask = 0;
for (unsigned ti = 0, te = TypeVec.size(); ti != te; ++ti) {
// Generate the switch case(s) for this builtin for the type validation.
bool quad = false, poly = false, usgn = false;
@ -1512,10 +1512,10 @@ void NeonEmitter::runHeader(raw_ostream &OS) {
if (quad) {
qi = ti;
qmask |= 1 << GetNeonEnum(Proto, TypeVec[ti]);
qmask |= 1ULL << GetNeonEnum(Proto, TypeVec[ti]);
} else {
si = ti;
mask |= 1 << GetNeonEnum(Proto, TypeVec[ti]);
mask |= 1ULL << GetNeonEnum(Proto, TypeVec[ti]);
}
}