forked from OSchip/llvm-project
tidy up some more: remove some extraneous inline specifiers, return harder.
llvm-svn: 85780
This commit is contained in:
parent
78eedecade
commit
7ccf1a6df6
|
@ -82,21 +82,21 @@ class LatticeVal {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public:
|
||||
inline LatticeVal() : Val(0, undefined) {}
|
||||
LatticeVal() : Val(0, undefined) {}
|
||||
|
||||
inline bool isUndefined() const { return getLatticeValue() == undefined; }
|
||||
inline bool isConstant() const {
|
||||
bool isUndefined() const { return getLatticeValue() == undefined; }
|
||||
bool isConstant() const {
|
||||
return getLatticeValue() == constant || getLatticeValue() == forcedconstant;
|
||||
}
|
||||
inline bool isOverdefined() const { return getLatticeValue() == overdefined; }
|
||||
bool isOverdefined() const { return getLatticeValue() == overdefined; }
|
||||
|
||||
inline Constant *getConstant() const {
|
||||
Constant *getConstant() const {
|
||||
assert(isConstant() && "Cannot get the constant of a non-constant!");
|
||||
return Val.getPointer();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// markOverdefined - Return true if this is a change in status.
|
||||
inline bool markOverdefined() {
|
||||
bool markOverdefined() {
|
||||
if (isOverdefined())
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ public:
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// markConstant - Return true if this is a change in status.
|
||||
inline bool markConstant(Constant *V) {
|
||||
bool markConstant(Constant *V) {
|
||||
if (isConstant()) {
|
||||
assert(getConstant() == V && "Marking constant with different value");
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ public:
|
|||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
inline void markForcedConstant(Constant *V) {
|
||||
void markForcedConstant(Constant *V) {
|
||||
assert(isUndefined() && "Can't force a defined value!");
|
||||
Val.setInt(forcedconstant);
|
||||
Val.setPointer(V);
|
||||
|
@ -164,12 +164,13 @@ class SCCPSolver : public InstVisitor<SCCPSolver> {
|
|||
/// that return multiple values.
|
||||
DenseMap<std::pair<Function*, unsigned>, LatticeVal> TrackedMultipleRetVals;
|
||||
|
||||
// The reason for two worklists is that overdefined is the lowest state
|
||||
// on the lattice, and moving things to overdefined as fast as possible
|
||||
// makes SCCP converge much faster.
|
||||
// By having a separate worklist, we accomplish this because everything
|
||||
// possibly overdefined will become overdefined at the soonest possible
|
||||
// point.
|
||||
/// The reason for two worklists is that overdefined is the lowest state
|
||||
/// on the lattice, and moving things to overdefined as fast as possible
|
||||
/// makes SCCP converge much faster.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// By having a separate worklist, we accomplish this because everything
|
||||
/// possibly overdefined will become overdefined at the soonest possible
|
||||
/// point.
|
||||
SmallVector<Value*, 64> OverdefinedInstWorkList;
|
||||
SmallVector<Value*, 64> InstWorkList;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -263,28 +264,28 @@ private:
|
|||
// is not already a constant, add it to the instruction work list so that
|
||||
// the users of the instruction are updated later.
|
||||
//
|
||||
inline void markConstant(LatticeVal &IV, Value *V, Constant *C) {
|
||||
if (IV.markConstant(C)) {
|
||||
void markConstant(LatticeVal &IV, Value *V, Constant *C) {
|
||||
if (!IV.markConstant(C)) return;
|
||||
DEBUG(errs() << "markConstant: " << *C << ": " << *V << '\n');
|
||||
InstWorkList.push_back(V);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
inline void markForcedConstant(LatticeVal &IV, Value *V, Constant *C) {
|
||||
void markForcedConstant(LatticeVal &IV, Value *V, Constant *C) {
|
||||
IV.markForcedConstant(C);
|
||||
DEBUG(errs() << "markForcedConstant: " << *C << ": " << *V << '\n');
|
||||
InstWorkList.push_back(V);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
inline void markConstant(Value *V, Constant *C) {
|
||||
void markConstant(Value *V, Constant *C) {
|
||||
markConstant(ValueState[V], V, C);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// markOverdefined - Make a value be marked as "overdefined". If the
|
||||
// value is not already overdefined, add it to the overdefined instruction
|
||||
// work list so that the users of the instruction are updated later.
|
||||
inline void markOverdefined(LatticeVal &IV, Value *V) {
|
||||
if (IV.markOverdefined()) {
|
||||
void markOverdefined(LatticeVal &IV, Value *V) {
|
||||
if (!IV.markOverdefined()) return;
|
||||
|
||||
DEBUG(errs() << "markOverdefined: ";
|
||||
if (Function *F = dyn_cast<Function>(V))
|
||||
errs() << "Function '" << F->getName() << "'\n";
|
||||
|
@ -293,9 +294,8 @@ private:
|
|||
// Only instructions go on the work list
|
||||
OverdefinedInstWorkList.push_back(V);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
inline void mergeInValue(LatticeVal &IV, Value *V, LatticeVal &MergeWithV) {
|
||||
void mergeInValue(LatticeVal &IV, Value *V, LatticeVal &MergeWithV) {
|
||||
if (IV.isOverdefined() || MergeWithV.isUndefined())
|
||||
return; // Noop.
|
||||
if (MergeWithV.isOverdefined())
|
||||
|
@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ private:
|
|||
markOverdefined(IV, V);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
inline void mergeInValue(Value *V, LatticeVal &MergeWithV) {
|
||||
void mergeInValue(Value *V, LatticeVal &MergeWithV) {
|
||||
return mergeInValue(ValueState[V], V, MergeWithV);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ private:
|
|||
// constants should be marked as constants. If a value is not known to be an
|
||||
// Instruction object, then use this accessor to get its value from the map.
|
||||
//
|
||||
inline LatticeVal &getValueState(Value *V) {
|
||||
LatticeVal &getValueState(Value *V) {
|
||||
std::map<Value*, LatticeVal>::iterator I = ValueState.find(V);
|
||||
if (I != ValueState.end()) return I->second; // Common case, in the map
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -593,10 +593,8 @@ void SCCPSolver::visitPHINode(PHINode &PN) {
|
|||
|
||||
// Super-extra-high-degree PHI nodes are unlikely to ever be marked constant,
|
||||
// and slow us down a lot. Just mark them overdefined.
|
||||
if (PN.getNumIncomingValues() > 64) {
|
||||
markOverdefined(PNIV, &PN);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (PN.getNumIncomingValues() > 64)
|
||||
return markOverdefined(PNIV, &PN);
|
||||
|
||||
// Look at all of the executable operands of the PHI node. If any of them
|
||||
// are overdefined, the PHI becomes overdefined as well. If they are all
|
||||
|
@ -609,29 +607,25 @@ void SCCPSolver::visitPHINode(PHINode &PN) {
|
|||
LatticeVal &IV = getValueState(PN.getIncomingValue(i));
|
||||
if (IV.isUndefined()) continue; // Doesn't influence PHI node.
|
||||
|
||||
if (isEdgeFeasible(PN.getIncomingBlock(i), PN.getParent())) {
|
||||
if (IV.isOverdefined()) { // PHI node becomes overdefined!
|
||||
markOverdefined(&PN);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!isEdgeFeasible(PN.getIncomingBlock(i), PN.getParent()))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (IV.isOverdefined()) // PHI node becomes overdefined!
|
||||
return markOverdefined(&PN);
|
||||
|
||||
if (OperandVal == 0) { // Grab the first value.
|
||||
OperandVal = IV.getConstant();
|
||||
} else { // Another value is being merged in!
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// There is already a reachable operand. If we conflict with it,
|
||||
// then the PHI node becomes overdefined. If we agree with it, we
|
||||
// can continue on.
|
||||
|
||||
// Check to see if there are two different constants merging.
|
||||
if (IV.getConstant() != OperandVal) {
|
||||
// Yes there is. This means the PHI node is not constant.
|
||||
// You must be overdefined poor PHI.
|
||||
//
|
||||
markOverdefined(&PN); // The PHI node now becomes overdefined
|
||||
return; // I'm done analyzing you
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Check to see if there are two different constants merging, if so, the PHI
|
||||
// node is overdefined.
|
||||
if (IV.getConstant() != OperandVal)
|
||||
return markOverdefined(&PN);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If we exited the loop, this means that the PHI node only has constant
|
||||
|
@ -714,10 +708,8 @@ void SCCPSolver::visitExtractValueInst(ExtractValueInst &EVI) {
|
|||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
// Currently only handle single-index extractvalues.
|
||||
if (EVI.getNumIndices() != 1) {
|
||||
markOverdefined(&EVI);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (EVI.getNumIndices() != 1)
|
||||
return markOverdefined(&EVI);
|
||||
|
||||
Function *F = 0;
|
||||
if (CallInst *CI = dyn_cast<CallInst>(Aggr))
|
||||
|
@ -727,17 +719,13 @@ void SCCPSolver::visitExtractValueInst(ExtractValueInst &EVI) {
|
|||
|
||||
// TODO: If IPSCCP resolves the callee of this function, we could propagate a
|
||||
// result back!
|
||||
if (F == 0 || TrackedMultipleRetVals.empty()) {
|
||||
markOverdefined(&EVI);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (F == 0 || TrackedMultipleRetVals.empty())
|
||||
return markOverdefined(&EVI);
|
||||
|
||||
// See if we are tracking the result of the callee. If not tracking this
|
||||
// function (for example, it is a declaration) just move to overdefined.
|
||||
if (!TrackedMultipleRetVals.count(std::make_pair(F, *EVI.idx_begin()))) {
|
||||
markOverdefined(&EVI);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!TrackedMultipleRetVals.count(std::make_pair(F, *EVI.idx_begin())))
|
||||
return markOverdefined(&EVI);
|
||||
|
||||
// Otherwise, the value will be merged in here as a result of CallSite
|
||||
// handling.
|
||||
|
@ -752,26 +740,21 @@ void SCCPSolver::visitInsertValueInst(InsertValueInst &IVI) {
|
|||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
// Currently only handle single-index insertvalues.
|
||||
if (IVI.getNumIndices() != 1) {
|
||||
markOverdefined(&IVI);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (IVI.getNumIndices() != 1)
|
||||
return markOverdefined(&IVI);
|
||||
|
||||
// Currently only handle insertvalue instructions that are in a single-use
|
||||
// chain that builds up a return value.
|
||||
for (const InsertValueInst *TmpIVI = &IVI; ; ) {
|
||||
if (!TmpIVI->hasOneUse()) {
|
||||
markOverdefined(&IVI);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!TmpIVI->hasOneUse())
|
||||
return markOverdefined(&IVI);
|
||||
|
||||
const Value *V = *TmpIVI->use_begin();
|
||||
if (isa<ReturnInst>(V))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
TmpIVI = dyn_cast<InsertValueInst>(V);
|
||||
if (!TmpIVI) {
|
||||
markOverdefined(&IVI);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!TmpIVI)
|
||||
return markOverdefined(&IVI);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// See if we are tracking the result of the callee.
|
||||
|
@ -808,10 +791,8 @@ void SCCPSolver::visitSelectInst(SelectInst &I) {
|
|||
|
||||
// select ?, C, C -> C.
|
||||
if (TVal.isConstant() && FVal.isConstant() &&
|
||||
TVal.getConstant() == FVal.getConstant()) {
|
||||
markConstant(&I, FVal.getConstant());
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
TVal.getConstant() == FVal.getConstant())
|
||||
return markConstant(&I, FVal.getConstant());
|
||||
|
||||
if (TVal.isUndefined()) { // select ?, undef, X -> X.
|
||||
mergeInValue(&I, FVal);
|
||||
|
@ -854,17 +835,14 @@ void SCCPSolver::visitBinaryOperator(Instruction &I) {
|
|||
return;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (I.getOpcode() == Instruction::And) {
|
||||
if (NonOverdefVal->getConstant()->isNullValue()) {
|
||||
markConstant(IV, &I, NonOverdefVal->getConstant());
|
||||
return; // X and 0 = 0
|
||||
}
|
||||
// X and 0 = 0
|
||||
if (NonOverdefVal->getConstant()->isNullValue())
|
||||
return markConstant(IV, &I, NonOverdefVal->getConstant());
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (ConstantInt *CI =
|
||||
dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(NonOverdefVal->getConstant()))
|
||||
if (CI->isAllOnesValue()) {
|
||||
markConstant(IV, &I, NonOverdefVal->getConstant());
|
||||
return; // X or -1 = -1
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (CI->isAllOnesValue()) // X or -1 = -1
|
||||
return markConstant(IV, &I, NonOverdefVal->getConstant());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -893,7 +871,9 @@ void SCCPSolver::visitBinaryOperator(Instruction &I) {
|
|||
if (In1.isOverdefined() || In2.isOverdefined()) {
|
||||
Result.markOverdefined();
|
||||
break; // Cannot fold this operation over the PHI nodes!
|
||||
} else if (In1.isConstant() && In2.isConstant()) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (In1.isConstant() && In2.isConstant()) {
|
||||
Constant *V =
|
||||
ConstantExpr::get(I.getOpcode(), In1.getConstant(),
|
||||
In2.getConstant());
|
||||
|
@ -1038,8 +1018,7 @@ void SCCPSolver::visitCmpInst(CmpInst &I) {
|
|||
|
||||
void SCCPSolver::visitExtractElementInst(ExtractElementInst &I) {
|
||||
// FIXME : SCCP does not handle vectors properly.
|
||||
markOverdefined(&I);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
return markOverdefined(&I);
|
||||
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
LatticeVal &ValState = getValueState(I.getOperand(0));
|
||||
|
@ -1055,8 +1034,7 @@ void SCCPSolver::visitExtractElementInst(ExtractElementInst &I) {
|
|||
|
||||
void SCCPSolver::visitInsertElementInst(InsertElementInst &I) {
|
||||
// FIXME : SCCP does not handle vectors properly.
|
||||
markOverdefined(&I);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
return markOverdefined(&I);
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
LatticeVal &ValState = getValueState(I.getOperand(0));
|
||||
LatticeVal &EltState = getValueState(I.getOperand(1));
|
||||
|
@ -1080,8 +1058,7 @@ void SCCPSolver::visitInsertElementInst(InsertElementInst &I) {
|
|||
|
||||
void SCCPSolver::visitShuffleVectorInst(ShuffleVectorInst &I) {
|
||||
// FIXME : SCCP does not handle vectors properly.
|
||||
markOverdefined(&I);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
return markOverdefined(&I);
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
LatticeVal &V1State = getValueState(I.getOperand(0));
|
||||
LatticeVal &V2State = getValueState(I.getOperand(1));
|
||||
|
@ -1122,10 +1099,9 @@ void SCCPSolver::visitGetElementPtrInst(GetElementPtrInst &I) {
|
|||
if (State.isUndefined())
|
||||
return; // Operands are not resolved yet.
|
||||
|
||||
if (State.isOverdefined()) {
|
||||
markOverdefined(IV, &I);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (State.isOverdefined())
|
||||
return markOverdefined(IV, &I);
|
||||
|
||||
assert(State.isConstant() && "Unknown state!");
|
||||
Operands.push_back(State.getConstant());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1166,17 +1142,15 @@ void SCCPSolver::visitLoadInst(LoadInst &I) {
|
|||
// TODO: Consider a target hook for valid address spaces for this xform.
|
||||
if (isa<ConstantPointerNull>(Ptr) && I.getPointerAddressSpace() == 0) {
|
||||
// load null -> null
|
||||
markConstant(IV, &I, Constant::getNullValue(I.getType()));
|
||||
return;
|
||||
return markConstant(IV, &I, Constant::getNullValue(I.getType()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Transform load (constant global) into the value loaded.
|
||||
if (GlobalVariable *GV = dyn_cast<GlobalVariable>(Ptr)) {
|
||||
if (GV->isConstant()) {
|
||||
if (GV->hasDefinitiveInitializer()) {
|
||||
markConstant(IV, &I, GV->getInitializer());
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (GV->hasDefinitiveInitializer())
|
||||
return markConstant(IV, &I, GV->getInitializer());
|
||||
|
||||
} else if (!TrackedGlobals.empty()) {
|
||||
// If we are tracking this global, merge in the known value for it.
|
||||
DenseMap<GlobalVariable*, LatticeVal>::iterator It =
|
||||
|
@ -1194,10 +1168,8 @@ void SCCPSolver::visitLoadInst(LoadInst &I) {
|
|||
if (GlobalVariable *GV = dyn_cast<GlobalVariable>(CE->getOperand(0)))
|
||||
if (GV->isConstant() && GV->hasDefinitiveInitializer())
|
||||
if (Constant *V =
|
||||
ConstantFoldLoadThroughGEPConstantExpr(GV->getInitializer(), CE)) {
|
||||
markConstant(IV, &I, V);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
ConstantFoldLoadThroughGEPConstantExpr(GV->getInitializer(), CE))
|
||||
return markConstant(IV, &I, V);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Otherwise we cannot say for certain what value this load will produce.
|
||||
|
@ -1226,27 +1198,23 @@ CallOverdefined:
|
|||
for (CallSite::arg_iterator AI = CS.arg_begin(), E = CS.arg_end();
|
||||
AI != E; ++AI) {
|
||||
LatticeVal &State = getValueState(*AI);
|
||||
|
||||
if (State.isUndefined())
|
||||
return; // Operands are not resolved yet.
|
||||
else if (State.isOverdefined()) {
|
||||
markOverdefined(I);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (State.isOverdefined())
|
||||
return markOverdefined(I);
|
||||
assert(State.isConstant() && "Unknown state!");
|
||||
Operands.push_back(State.getConstant());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If we can constant fold this, mark the result of the call as a
|
||||
// constant.
|
||||
if (Constant *C = ConstantFoldCall(F, Operands.data(), Operands.size())) {
|
||||
markConstant(I, C);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (Constant *C = ConstantFoldCall(F, Operands.data(), Operands.size()))
|
||||
return markConstant(I, C);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Otherwise, we don't know anything about this call, mark it overdefined.
|
||||
markOverdefined(I);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
return markOverdefined(I);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If this is a single/zero retval case, see if we're tracking the function.
|
||||
|
@ -1265,6 +1233,7 @@ CallOverdefined:
|
|||
// Need to mark as overdefined, otherwise it stays undefined which
|
||||
// creates extractvalue undef, <idx>
|
||||
markOverdefined(I);
|
||||
|
||||
// If we are tracking this callee, propagate the return values of the call
|
||||
// into this call site. We do this by walking all the uses. Single-index
|
||||
// ExtractValueInst uses can be tracked; anything more complicated is
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue