forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[LoopDeletion] Benefit from branches by undef conditions when symbolically executing 1st iteration
We can exploit branches by `undef` condition. Frankly, the LangRef says that such branches are UB, so we can assume that all outgoing edges of such blocks are dead. However, from practical perspective, we know that this is not supported correctly in some other places. So we are being conservative about it. Branch by undef is treated in the following way: - If it is a loop-exiting branch, we always assume it exits the loop; - If not, we arbitrarily assume it takes `true` value. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104689 Reviewed By: nikic
This commit is contained in:
parent
eb237ffca8
commit
7c73c2ede8
|
@ -333,13 +333,35 @@ static bool canProveExitOnFirstIteration(Loop *L, DominatorTree &DT,
|
|||
// Can we prove constant true or false for this condition?
|
||||
LHS = getValueOnFirstIteration(LHS, FirstIterValue, SQ);
|
||||
RHS = getValueOnFirstIteration(RHS, FirstIterValue, SQ);
|
||||
auto *KnownCondition =
|
||||
dyn_cast_or_null<ConstantInt>(SimplifyICmpInst(Pred, LHS, RHS, SQ));
|
||||
auto *KnownCondition = SimplifyICmpInst(Pred, LHS, RHS, SQ);
|
||||
if (!KnownCondition) {
|
||||
// Failed to simplify.
|
||||
MarkAllSuccessorsLive(BB);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (KnownCondition->isAllOnesValue())
|
||||
if (isa<UndefValue>(KnownCondition)) {
|
||||
// TODO: According to langref, branching by undef is undefined behavior.
|
||||
// It means that, theoretically, we should be able to just continue
|
||||
// without marking any successors as live. However, we are not certain
|
||||
// how correct our compiler is at handling such cases. So we are being
|
||||
// very conservative here.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// If there is a non-loop successor, always assume this branch leaves the
|
||||
// loop. Otherwise, arbitrarily take IfTrue.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Once we are certain that branching by undef is handled correctly by
|
||||
// other transforms, we should not mark any successors live here.
|
||||
if (L->contains(IfTrue) && L->contains(IfFalse))
|
||||
MarkLiveEdge(BB, IfTrue);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
auto *ConstCondition = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(KnownCondition);
|
||||
if (!ConstCondition) {
|
||||
// Non-constant condition, cannot analyze any further.
|
||||
MarkAllSuccessorsLive(BB);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (ConstCondition->isAllOnesValue())
|
||||
MarkLiveEdge(BB, IfTrue);
|
||||
else
|
||||
MarkLiveEdge(BB, IfFalse);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -881,20 +881,19 @@ failure:
|
|||
unreachable
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
; TODO: We can break the backedge here by exploiting undef.
|
||||
define i32 @test_multiple_pred_undef_3(i1 %cond, i1 %cond2) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_multiple_pred_undef_3(
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[LOOP:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: loop:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUM:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 0, [[ENTRY:%.*]] ], [ [[SUM_NEXT:%.*]], [[BACKEDGE:%.*]] ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUM:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 0, [[ENTRY:%.*]] ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUB:%.*]] = sub i32 4, [[SUM]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[IS_POSITIVE:%.*]] = icmp sgt i32 [[SUB]], 0
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[IS_POSITIVE]], label [[IF_TRUE:%.*]], label [[IF_FALSE:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: if.true:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[COND:%.*]], label [[IF_TRUE_1:%.*]], label [[IF_TRUE_2:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: if.true.1:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[BACKEDGE]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[BACKEDGE:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: if.true.2:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[BACKEDGE]]
|
||||
; CHECK: if.false:
|
||||
|
@ -905,9 +904,11 @@ define i32 @test_multiple_pred_undef_3(i1 %cond, i1 %cond2) {
|
|||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[BACKEDGE]]
|
||||
; CHECK: backedge:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[MERGE_PHI:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 0, [[IF_FALSE_1]] ], [ 0, [[IF_FALSE_2]] ], [ undef, [[IF_TRUE_1]] ], [ undef, [[IF_TRUE_2]] ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUM_NEXT]] = add i32 [[SUM]], [[MERGE_PHI]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUM_NEXT:%.*]] = add i32 [[SUM]], [[MERGE_PHI]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[LOOP_COND:%.*]] = icmp ne i32 [[SUM_NEXT]], 4
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[LOOP_COND]], label [[LOOP]], label [[DONE:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[LOOP_COND]], label [[BACKEDGE_LOOP_CRIT_EDGE:%.*]], label [[DONE:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: backedge.loop_crit_edge:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: unreachable
|
||||
; CHECK: done:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUM_NEXT_LCSSA:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[SUM_NEXT]], [[BACKEDGE]] ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[SUM_NEXT_LCSSA]]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue