forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[Sema] Suppress -Wchar-subscripts if the index is a literal char
Assume that the user knows what they're doing if they provide a char literal as an array index. This more closely matches the behavior of GCC. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58896
This commit is contained in:
parent
343597789e
commit
7adab7719e
|
@ -4741,7 +4741,8 @@ Sema::CreateBuiltinArraySubscriptExpr(Expr *Base, SourceLocation LLoc,
|
|||
|
||||
if ((IndexExpr->getType()->isSpecificBuiltinType(BuiltinType::Char_S) ||
|
||||
IndexExpr->getType()->isSpecificBuiltinType(BuiltinType::Char_U))
|
||||
&& !IndexExpr->isTypeDependent())
|
||||
&& !IndexExpr->isTypeDependent()
|
||||
&& !isa<CharacterLiteral>(IndexExpr))
|
||||
Diag(LLoc, diag::warn_subscript_is_char) << IndexExpr->getSourceRange();
|
||||
|
||||
// C99 6.5.2.1p1: "shall have type "pointer to *object* type". Similarly,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -14,6 +14,19 @@ void t2() {
|
|||
int val = subscript[array]; // expected-warning{{array subscript is of type 'char'}}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void t3() {
|
||||
int array[50] = { 0 };
|
||||
int val = array[' ']; // no warning, subscript is a literal
|
||||
}
|
||||
void t4() {
|
||||
int array[50] = { 0 };
|
||||
int val = '('[array]; // no warning, subscript is a literal
|
||||
}
|
||||
void t5() {
|
||||
int array[50] = { 0 };
|
||||
int val = array['\x11']; // no warning, subscript is a literal
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void test() {
|
||||
t1<char>(); // expected-note {{in instantiation of function template specialization 't1<char>' requested here}}
|
||||
t2<char>(); // expected-note {{in instantiation of function template specialization 't2<char>' requested here}}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue