[analyzer][solver] Fix CmpOpTable handling bug

There is an error in the implementation of the logic of reaching the `Unknonw` tristate in CmpOpTable.

```
void cmp_op_table_unknownX2(int x, int y, int z) {
  if (x >= y) {
                    // x >= y    [1, 1]
    if (x + z < y)
      return;
                    // x + z < y [0, 0]
    if (z != 0)
      return;
                    // x < y     [0, 0]
    clang_analyzer_eval(x > y);  // expected-warning{{TRUE}} expected-warning{{FALSE}}
  }
}
```
We miss the `FALSE` warning because the false branch is infeasible.

We have to exploit simplification to discover the bug. If we had `x < y`
as the second condition then the analyzer would return the parent state
on the false path and the new constraint would not be part of the State.
But adding `z` to the condition makes both paths feasible.

The root cause of the bug is that we reach the `Unknown` tristate
twice, but in both occasions we reach the same `Op` that is `>=` in the
test case. So, we reached `>=` twice, but we never reached `!=`, thus
querying the `Unknonw2x` column with `getCmpOpStateForUnknownX2` is
wrong.

The solution is to ensure that we reached both **different** `Op`s once.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110910
This commit is contained in:
Gabor Marton 2021-09-30 23:26:22 +02:00
parent b2c906da19
commit 792be5df92
2 changed files with 27 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -1112,7 +1112,7 @@ private:
if (!SSE)
return llvm::None;
BinaryOperatorKind CurrentOP = SSE->getOpcode();
const BinaryOperatorKind CurrentOP = SSE->getOpcode();
// We currently do not support <=> (C++20).
if (!BinaryOperator::isComparisonOp(CurrentOP) || (CurrentOP == BO_Cmp))
@ -1126,7 +1126,12 @@ private:
SymbolManager &SymMgr = State->getSymbolManager();
int UnknownStates = 0;
// We use this variable to store the last queried operator (`QueriedOP`)
// for which the `getCmpOpState` returned with `Unknown`. If there are two
// different OPs that returned `Unknown` then we have to query the special
// `UnknownX2` column. We assume that `getCmpOpState(CurrentOP, CurrentOP)`
// never returns `Unknown`, so `CurrentOP` is a good initial value.
BinaryOperatorKind LastQueriedOpToUnknown = CurrentOP;
// Loop goes through all of the columns exept the last one ('UnknownX2').
// We treat `UnknownX2` column separately at the end of the loop body.
@ -1163,15 +1168,18 @@ private:
CmpOpTable.getCmpOpState(CurrentOP, QueriedOP);
if (BranchState == OperatorRelationsTable::Unknown) {
if (++UnknownStates == 2)
// If we met both Unknown states.
if (LastQueriedOpToUnknown != CurrentOP &&
LastQueriedOpToUnknown != QueriedOP) {
// If we got the Unknown state for both different operators.
// if (x <= y) // assume true
// if (x != y) // assume true
// if (x < y) // would be also true
// Get a state from `UnknownX2` column.
BranchState = CmpOpTable.getCmpOpStateForUnknownX2(CurrentOP);
else
} else {
LastQueriedOpToUnknown = QueriedOP;
continue;
}
}
return (BranchState == OperatorRelationsTable::True) ? getTrueRange(T)

View File

@ -211,3 +211,17 @@ void comparison_le_ge(int x, int y) {
clang_analyzer_eval(y != x); // expected-warning{{FALSE}}
}
}
// Test the logic of reaching the `Unknonw` tristate in CmpOpTable.
void cmp_op_table_unknownX2(int x, int y, int z) {
if (x >= y) {
// x >= y [1, 1]
if (x + z < y)
return;
// x + z < y [0, 0]
if (z != 0)
return;
// x < y [0, 0]
clang_analyzer_eval(x > y); // expected-warning{{TRUE}} expected-warning{{FALSE}}
}
}