From 77d7698709874b0a8c0fef6d8652db58b40fd83e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Reid Kleckner Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 18:22:25 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix MSVCCompatibility doc ReST and wording. llvm-svn: 202732 --- clang/docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/clang/docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst b/clang/docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst index 346b860e764f..879bb3de1639 100644 --- a/clang/docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst +++ b/clang/docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst @@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ ABI features The status of major ABI-impacting C++ features: -* Record layout: :good:`Mostly complete`. We've attacked this with a fuzzer, - and most of the remaining failures involve ``#pragma pack``, +* Record layout: :good:`Mostly complete`. We've tested this with a fuzzer, and + most of the remaining failures involve ``#pragma pack``, ``__declspec(align(N))``, or other pragmas. * Class inheritance: :good:`Mostly complete`. This covers all of the standard @@ -96,8 +96,8 @@ The status of major ABI-impacting C++ features: Template instantiation and name lookup ====================================== -In addition to the usual `dependent name lookup FAQs `_, Clang is often unable -to parse certain invalid C++ constructs that MSVC allows. As of this writing, +In addition to the usual `dependent name lookup FAQs`_, Clang is often unable to +parse certain invalid C++ constructs that MSVC allows. As of this writing, Clang will reject code with missing ``typename`` annotations: .. _dependent name lookup FAQs: