forked from OSchip/llvm-project
Fix MSVCCompatibility doc ReST and wording.
llvm-svn: 202732
This commit is contained in:
parent
17388a61b2
commit
77d7698709
|
@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ ABI features
|
|||
|
||||
The status of major ABI-impacting C++ features:
|
||||
|
||||
* Record layout: :good:`Mostly complete`. We've attacked this with a fuzzer,
|
||||
and most of the remaining failures involve ``#pragma pack``,
|
||||
* Record layout: :good:`Mostly complete`. We've tested this with a fuzzer, and
|
||||
most of the remaining failures involve ``#pragma pack``,
|
||||
``__declspec(align(N))``, or other pragmas.
|
||||
|
||||
* Class inheritance: :good:`Mostly complete`. This covers all of the standard
|
||||
|
@ -96,8 +96,8 @@ The status of major ABI-impacting C++ features:
|
|||
Template instantiation and name lookup
|
||||
======================================
|
||||
|
||||
In addition to the usual `dependent name lookup FAQs `_, Clang is often unable
|
||||
to parse certain invalid C++ constructs that MSVC allows. As of this writing,
|
||||
In addition to the usual `dependent name lookup FAQs`_, Clang is often unable to
|
||||
parse certain invalid C++ constructs that MSVC allows. As of this writing,
|
||||
Clang will reject code with missing ``typename`` annotations:
|
||||
|
||||
.. _dependent name lookup FAQs:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue